Skip to main content
Log in

An organizational analysis of political action committees

  • Published:
Political Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As the number and putative importance of political action committees have grown, so too has scholarly attention to this new breed of political organization. Yet this attention has been uneven. Although much is now known about the aggregate spending patterns of PACs, much less is known about their internal lives. The present study attempts to open the PAC black box to empirical inquiry. Drawing on interviews with the managers of 70 Washington-based political action committees, we suggest how theoretical perspectives about formal voluntary associations may be usefully applied in explaining the behavior of PACs. After examining the relationships among several variables — organizational goals, constituency relations and decision making, strategy, and interorganizational relations — we show how these forces affect the behavior of corporate, trade/membership, labor, and nonconnected PACS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adamany, David (1980). PACs and the democratic financing of politics.Arizona Law Review 22:569–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, Jeffrey M. (1977).Lobbying for the People. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, Steven H. (1979). Business and politics — an update.Harvard Business Review 57:149–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budde, Bernadette A. (1980). The practical role of corporate PAC's in the political process.Arizona Law Review 22:555–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chappell, Henry W., Jr. (1981). Campaign contributions and voting on the cargo preference bill: A comparison of simultaneous models.Public Choice 36:301–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chappell, Henry W., Jr. (1982). Campaign contributions and congressional voting: A simultaneous probit-tobit model.Review of Economics and Statistics 64:77–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eismeier, Theodore J., and Pollock III, Philip H. (1984a). Political action committees: Varieties of organization and strategy. In Michael J. Malbin (ed.),Money and Politics in the United States: Financing Elections in the 1980s, pp. 122–141. Washington, D.C., and Chatham, N.J.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research and Chatham House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eismeier, Theodore J., and Pollock III, Philip H. (1984b). Politics and markets: Corporate money in American national elections. Paper prepared for delivery at Roundtable on Political Finance and Political Corruption, Oxford University, March 26–27, 1984.

  • Elliot, Lee Ann (1980). Political action committees — Precincts of the 1980's.Arizona Law Review 22:539–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, Edwin M. (1969).The Corporation in American Politics. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eulau, Heinz (1969).Micro-Macro Political Analysis. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frendreis, John P., and Waterman, Richard W. (1983). PAC contributions and legislative behavior: Senate voting on trucking deregulation. Paper prepared for delivery at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, April 20–22, 1983.

  • Green, John C., and Guth, James L. (1983). Partisans and ideologues: A profile of contributors to party and ideological PACs. Paper prepared for delivery at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, November 3–6, 1983.

  • Handler, Edward, and Mulkern, John R. (1982).Business in Politics: Campaign Strategies of Corporate Political Action Committees. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heclo, Hugh (1978). Issue networks and the executive establishment. In Anthony King (ed.),The New American Political System, chap. 3. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, Albert O. (1970).Exit, Voice, and Loyalty. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, Harry (1979). Interest groups in the postpartisan era: The political machine of the AFL-CIO.Political Science Quarterly 94:117–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Politics, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University (1979). An analysis of the impact of the Federal Election Campaign Act, 1972–78. Prepared for the Committee on House Administration, United States House of Representatives.

  • Jessup, David (1980). Can political influence be democratized: A labor perspective. In Michael J. Malbin (ed.),Parties, Interest Groups, and Campaign Finance Laws. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Ruth S., and Miller, Warren E. (1983). Financing campaigns: Modes of individual contribution. Paper prepared for delivery at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, April 20–22, 1983.

  • Kau, James B., and Rubin, Paul H. (1982).Congressmen, Constituents, and Contributors. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoke, David, and Wood, James R. (1981).Organized for Action. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latus, Margaret Ann (1984). Assessing ideological PACs: From outrage to understanding. In Michael J. Malbin (ed.),Money and Politics in the United States: Financing Elections in the 1980s, pp. 142–171. Washington, D.C., and Chatham, N.J.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research and Chatham House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, Charles E. (1977).Politics and Markets. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malbin, Michael J. (1980). Of mountains and molehills: PACs, campaigns and public policy. In Michael J. Malbin (ed.),Parties, Interest Groups, and Campaign Finance Laws. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malbin, Michael J. (1984). Looking back at the future of campaign finance reform: Interest groups and American elections. In Michael J. Malbin (ed.),Money and Politics in the United States: Financing Elections in the 1980s, pp. 232–276. Washington, D.C., and Chatham, N.J.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research and Chatham House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, Howard (1982).Selfishness, Altruism, and Rationality. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moe, Terry M. (1980).The Organization of Interests. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, Lawrence B. (1973). The concept of organizational goal.American Political Science Review 67:470–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Walter K. (1980). The case of an independent political action committee. In Michael J. Malbin (ed.),Parties, Interest Groups and Campaign Finance Laws, pp. 56–67. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, Mancur (1965).The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, Charles (1968). Organizational goals.International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, Charles (1970). Members as resources in voluntary associations. In Walter R. Rosengren (ed.),Organizations and Clients, pp. 93–116. Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose-Ackerman, Susan (1982). Charitable giving and “excessive” fundraising.Quarterly Journal of Economics 97:193–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury, Robert H. (1969). An exchange theory of interest groups.American Journal of Political Science 13:1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Tierney, John T. (1983). More of the same: Washington pressure group activity in a decade of change.Journal of Politics 45:351–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silberman, Jonathan I., and Durden, Garey C. (1976). Determining legislative preference on the minimum wage: An economic approach.Journal of Political Economy 84:317–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorauf, Frank J. (1984).Political Action Committees in American Politics: An Overview. New York: The Twentieth Century Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Jack (1983). Origins and maintenance of interest groups in America.American Political Science Review 77:390–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, W. P. (1982). Campaign contributions and voting: Milk money and dairy price supports.Western Political Quarterly 35:478–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, James Q. (1973).Political Organizations. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eismeier, T.J., Pollock, P.H. An organizational analysis of political action committees. Polit Behav 7, 192–216 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988798

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988798

Keywords

Navigation