Skip to main content
Log in

Choice of task and goal under conditions of general and specific affective inducement

  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study we examine the role of general and task-specific affect on task and goal choice in a performance setting. We use video stimuli to induce a general positive or general negative affective state, and use rate-of-progress and absolute discrepancy feedback to manipulate task-specific affect. Analyses indicate that general affective states influenced task and goal choices, self-efficacy expectations, and performance. Rate-of-progress feedback influenced affective state, task choice, and self-efficacy expectations. Absolute discrepancy feedback influenced task choice modestly and self-efficacy significantly. Generally, positive affect promoted mood maintenance while negative affect promoted mood repair, and general and task-specific affect exerted similar effects. Results are discussed in terms of the motivational consequences of affective states (either general or task-specific) for task and goal choices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency.American Psychologist, 37 122–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986).Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., & Cervone, D. (1986). Differential engagement of self-reactive influences in cognitive motivation.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 38 91–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. A. (1988). Negative effects of destructive criticism: Impact on conflict, self-efficacy, and task performance.Journal of Applied Psychology, 73 199–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. A. (1990). Countering the effects of destructive criticism: The relative efficacy of four interventions.Journal of Applied Psychology, 75 235–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brief, A. P., Burke, M. J., George, J. M., Robinson, B. S., & Webster, J. (1988). Should negative affectivity remain an unmeasured variable in the study of job stress?Journal of Applied Psychology, 73 193–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, M. J., Brief, A. P., George, J. M., Roberson, L., & Webster, J. (1989). Measuring affect at work: Confirmatory analyses of competing mood structures with conceptual linkage to cortical regulatory systems.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57 1091–1102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, M. J., & Pearlman, K. (1988). Recruitment, selection, and matching people to jobs. In J. P. Campbell & R. J. Campbell (Eds.),Productivity in organizations (pp. 97–142). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view.Psychological Review, 97(1), 19–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Iran-Nejad, Ashgar. (1986). The relationship in experience between various types of affect.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(5), 1031–1038.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Larsen, R. J. (1984). The independence of positive and negative affect.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47 1105–1117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Larsen, R. J., Levine, S., & Emmons, R. A. (1985). Intensity and frequency: The underlying dimensions of positive and negative affect.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(5), 1253–1265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gotlib, I. H., & Meyer, J. P. (1986). Factor analysis of the Multiple Affect Adjective Check List: A separation of positive and negative affect.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(6), 1161–1165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A. M. (1990). The influence of positive and negative affect on cognitive organization: Some implications for development. In N. Stein, B. Levanthal, & T. Trabasso (Eds.).Psychological and biological approaches to emotion (pp. 75–94). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A. M. (1987). Positive affect, cognitive processes, and social behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 20, pp. 203–253). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A. M. (1984). Toward understanding the role of affect in cognition. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.),Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 3, pp. 179–236). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A. M., & Baron, R. A. (1991). Positive affect as a factor in organizational behavior. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.),Research in organizational behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A. M., & Geva, N. (1987). The influence of positive affect on acceptable level of risk: The person with a large canoe has a large worry.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39 145–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A. M., Johnson, M. M. S. Mertz, E., & Robinson, G. F. (1985). The influence of positive affect on the unusualness of word associations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(6), 1413–1426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A. M., Nygren, T. E., & Ashby, F. G. (1988). The influence of positive affect on the subjective utility of gains and losses: It's not worth the risk.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55 710–717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A. M., Shalker, T., Clark, M., & Karp, L. (1978). Affect, accessibility of material in memory and behavior: A cognitive loop?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A.M., & Simmonds, S. F. (1978). The effect of feeling good on a helping task that is incompatible with good mood.Social Psychology (nowSocial Psychology Quarterly),41 345–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A., Cartledge, N., & Knerr, C. S. (1970). Studies of the relationship between satisfaction, goal-setting, and performance.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance (nowOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes),5 135–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A., Lee, F. E., & Bobko, P. (1984). Effect of self-efficacy, goals, and task strategies on task performance.Journal of Applied Psychology, 69 241–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcic, D. (1989).Organizational behavior: Experiences and cases. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuinness, D., & Pribram, K. (1980). The neuropsychology of attention: Emotional and motivational controls. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.),The brain and psychology (pp. 95–139). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, I. G., Potter, E. H., III, & Sarason, B. R. (1986). Recording and recall of personal events: Effects on cognitions and behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(2), 347–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, D. M., & Williamson, P. A. (1984). Asymmetric neutral control systems in human self-regulation.Psychological Review, 91 185–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood.Psychological Bulletin, 98 219–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1982). The emotional consequences of causal ascriptions. In M. S. Clark & S. T. Fiske (Eds.),Affect and cognition: The 17th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition (pp. 185–209). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saavedra, R., Earley, P.C. Choice of task and goal under conditions of general and specific affective inducement. Motiv Emot 15, 45–65 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991475

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991475

Keywords

Navigation