Skip to main content
Log in

Orienting and humor responses: A synthesis

  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Evidence is presented for a hypothesis that a humor response is an instance of a more general orienting response. The two responses both occur to stimulus novelty or incongruity and are identical behaviorally and physiologically, althouth their subjective components may differ. Evidence for the hypothesis is based on a series of paremeters that affect orienting and humor responses identically. Parameters on which the responses show strong parallels are the effects of habituation and the degree of stimulus change. Weaker parallels exist for such parameters as direction of stimulus change, number of habituation trials, stimulus complexity, salience, intensity, and the subject's arousal level. The weaker parallels are also areas in which additional humor research is needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aitken, P. P. (1974). Judgments of pleasingness and interestingness as functions of visual complexity.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103 240–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, J. (1981). Economics and operant conditioning. In P. Harzem & M. D. Zeiler (Eds.),Predictability, correlation, and contiguity (pp. 321–353). London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, R. J. (1977). Failure to find evidence of the unitary OR concept with indifferent low-intensity auditory stimuli.Physiological Psychology, 5 89–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlyne, D. E. (1957). Conflict and information-theory variables as determinants of human perceptual curiosity.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53 399–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlyne, D. E. (1958). The influence of complexity and novelty in the visual figures on orienting responses.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55 289–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlyne, D. E. (1960).Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlyne, D. E. (1969). Laughter, humor, and play. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.),The handbook of social psychology (vol. 3, pp. 795–852). Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlyne, D. E. (1972). Humor and its kin. In J. H. Goldstein & P. E. McGhee (Eds.),The psychology of humor (pp. 43–80). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlyne, D. E. (1978). Curiosity and learning.Motivation and Emotion, 2 97–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlyne, D. E., & McDonnell, P. (1965). Effect of stimulus complexity and incongruity on duration of EEG desynchronization.Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 18 156–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, A. S. (1968). The orienting response and direction of stimulus change.Psychonomic Science, 12 127–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolles, R. (1975).Theory of motivation (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branch, A. Y., Fine, G. A., & Jones, J. M. (1973, August).Laughter, smiling and rating scale: An analysis of response to tape recorder humor. Paper presented at the 81st American Psychological Association Convention, Montreal.

  • Bryant, J. (1977). Degree of hostility in squelches as a factor in humour appreciation. In A. J. Chapman & H. C. Foot (Eds.),It's a funny thing, humour (pp. 321–327). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, J. R., Bryant, J., & Zillmann, D. (1974). Enhancement of humor appreciation by transferred excitation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30 812–821.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, J. R., & Zillmann, D. (1973). Resentment toward victimized protagonists and severity of misfortunes they suffer as factors in humor appreciation.Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 6 321–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, A. J. (1973). Funniness of jokes, canned laughter and recall performance.Sociometry, 36 569–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, A. J. (1976). Social aspects of humorous laughter. In A. J. Chapman & H. C. Foot (Eds.),Humour and laughter: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 187–214). London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, B., Delafield, G., Lucas, B., Winwood, M., & Gale, A. (1972). Stimulus complexity and the electroencephalogram: Differential effects of the number and the variety of display elements.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 26 155–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cupchik, G. C., & Leventhal, H. (1974). Consistency between expressive behavior and the evaluation of humorous stimuli: The role of sex and self-observation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30 429–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deckers, L., & Edington, J. (1979, May).Facial expressions of mirth as a log-log function of the degree of incongruity in a psychophysical task. Paper presented at the Midwestern Psychological Association Convention, Chicago.

  • Deckers, L., & Gladfelter, E. (1981, May).Humor reactions interpreted as orienting responses. Paper presented at the Midwestern Psychological Association Convention, Chicago.

  • Deckers, L., Jenkins, S., & Gladfelter, E. (1977). Incongruity versus tension relief: Hypotheses of humor.Motivation and Emotion, 1 261–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deckers, L., & Kizer, P. (1974). A note on weight discrepancy and humor.Journal of Psychology, 86 309–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deckers, L., & Kizer, P. (1975). Humor and the incongruity hypothesis.Journal of Psychology, 90 215–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deckers, L., & Salais, D. (1983). Humor as a negatively accelerated function of the degree of incongruity.Motivation and Emotion, 7 357–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deckers, L., Wakim, J-C., & Rosselli, M. (1982, August).Parallels between orienting responses and humor responses. Paper presented at the Third International Conference on Humor, Washington, D.C.

  • Dodd, C., & Lewis, M. )1969). The magnitude of the orienting response in children as a function of changes in color and contour.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 8 296–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J. (1942). Appreciation of humor: An experimental and theoretical study.British Journal of Psychology, 32 295–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faw, T. T. (1970). The effects of stimulus incongruity on the free looking time of adults and children.Psychonomic Science, 19 355–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1960).Jokes and their relation to the unconscious (J. Strachey, Trans). New York: W. W. Norton. (Original work published 1905)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale, A., Bramley, P., Lucas, B., & Christie, B. (1972). Differential effect of visual and auditory complexity on the EEG: Negative hedonic value as a crucial variable?Psychonomic Science, 27 21–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale, A., Spratt, G., Christie, B., & Smallbone, A. (1975). Stimulus complexity, EEG abundance gradients, and detection efficiency in a visual recognition task.British Journal of Psychology, 66 289–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gang, M. J., & Teft, L. (1975). Individual differences in heart rate responses to affective sound.Psychophysiology, 12 423–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, W., & Routh, D. K. (1975). Humor response as related to violation of expectancies and to stimulus intensity in a weight-judgment task.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 41 673–674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godkewitsch, M. (1974). Correlates of humor: Verbal and nonverbal aesthetic reactions as a function of semantic distance with adjective-noun pairs. In D. E. Berlyne (Ed.),Studies in the new experimental aesthetics (pp. 279–304). Washington, D.C.: Hemisphere Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godkewitsch, M. (1976). Physiological and verbal indices of arousal in rated humour. In A. J. Chapman & H. C. Foot (Eds.),Humour and laughter: Theory, research, and applications pp. 117–138). London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J. H. (1970). Repetition, motive arousal, and humor appreciation.Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 4 90–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J. H., Harman, J., McGhee, P., & Karasik, R. (1975). Test of an information-processing model of humor: Physiological response changes during problem- and riddle-solving.Journal of General Psychology, 92 59–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J. H., Suls, J. M., & Anthony, S. (1972). Enjoyment of specific types of humor content: Motivation or salience? In J. H. Goldstein & P. E. McGhee (Eds.),The psychology of humor pp. 159–171). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, F. K. (1979). Distinguishing among orienting, defense, and startle reflexes. In H. D. Kimmel, E. H. van Olst, & J. F. Orlebeke (Eds.),The orienting reflex in humans (pp. 131–167). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, F. K., & Clifton, R. K. (1966). Heart-rate change as a component of the orienting response.Psychological Bulletin, 65 305–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grings, W. W. (1960). Preparatory set variables related to classical conditioning of autonomic responses.Psychological Review, 67 243–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. D. (1973). Orienting and defensive responses to visual stimuli.Psychophysiology, 10 453–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. D., & Blevings, G. (1975). Defensive responses to phobic stimuli.Biological Psychology, 3 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (1962). Human nature. In R. S. Peters (Ed.),Body, man, and citizen (pp. 215–225). New York: Collier Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, J. R., Zelazo, P. R., Jacobson, S. W., & Kagan, J. (1976). Infant reactivity to stimulus-schema discrepancy.Genetic Psychology Monographs, 93 27–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoppe, R. A. (1976). Artificial humor and uncertainty.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 42 1051–1056.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hursh, S. R. (1980). Economic concepts for the analysis of behavior.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 34 219–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Izard, C. E. (1977).Human emotions. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. M., Fine, G. H., & Brust, R. G. (1979). Interaction effects of picture and caption on humor ratings of cartoons.Journal of Social Psychology, 108 193–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keith-Spiegel, P. (1972). Early conceptions of humor: Varieties and issues. In J. M. Goldstein & P. E. McGhee (Eds.),The psychology of humor (pp. 3–39). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. T. (1955). The contingency of humor appreciation on the stimulus-confirmation of joke-ending expectations.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51 644–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimmel, H. D. (1960). The relationship between direction and amount of stimulus change and amount of perceptual disparity responses.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59 68–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimmel, H. D. (1979). Prologue: What is the orienting reflex? In H. D. Kimmel, E. H. Van Olst, & J. F. Orlebeke (Eds.),The orienting reflex in humans (pp. xi-xiv). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klorman, R., Wiesenfeld, A. R., & Austin, M. L. (1975). Autonomic responses to affective visual stimuli.Psychophysiology, 12 553–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, J. I. (1967). Somatic response patterning and stress: Some revisions of activation theory. In M. H. Appley & R. Trumbell (Eds.),Psychological stress: Issues in research (pp. 182–212). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, J. I., & Lacey, B. C. (1958). Verification and extension of the principle of autonomic response stereotypy.American Journal of Psychology, 71 50–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, J. I., & Lacey, B. C. (1970). Some automatic-central nervous system interrelationships. In P. Black (Ed.),Physiological correlates of emotion (pp. 205–227). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, C. W. (1968). Personality correlates of humor enjoyment following motivational arousal.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9 237–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landis, C., & Hunt, W. A. (1979).The startle pattern. New York: Farrar & Rinehart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langevin, R., & Day, H. I. (1972). Physiological correlates of humor. In J. H. Goldstein & P. E. McGhee (Eds.),The psychology of humor. (pp. 129–142). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leckart, B. T. (1966). Looking time: The effects of stimulus complexity and familiarity.Perception and Psychophysics, 1 142–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leckart, B. T., & Bakan, P. (1965). Complexity judgments of photographs and looking time.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 21 16–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavander, S. E., Lidberg, L. & Schalling, D. (1974). Habituation of the digital vasoconstrictive orienting response.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102 700–705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, H., & Mace, W. (1970). The effects of laughter on evaluation of a slapstick movie.Journal of Personality, 38 16–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M., & Goldberg, S. (1969). The acquisition and violation of expectancy: An experimental paradigm.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 7 70–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linde, E. (1928). Zur Frage vom psychischen Korrelate des psychogalavanischen Reflexphanomens.International Congress of Psychology: Proceedings and Papers, 8 351–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, R. (1966).Attention, arousal and the orientation reaction. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maher, T. F., & Furedy, J. J. (1979). A comparison of the pupillary and electrodermal components of the orienting reflex in sensitivity to initial stimulus presentation, repetition, and change. In H. D. Kimmel, E. H. van Olst, & J. F. Orlebeke (Eds.),The orienting reflex in humans. (pp. 381–391). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier, N. R. F. (1932). A gestalt theory of humour.British Journal of Psychology, 23 69–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, L. J. (1905). Psychology of aesthetics: Experimental prospecting in the field of the comic.American Journal of Psychology, 16 35–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGhee, P. E. (1974). Cognitive mastery and children's humor.Psychological Bulletin, 81 721–730.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGhee, P. E. (1976). Children's appreciation of humor: A test of the cognitive congruency principle.Child Development, 47 420–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nerhardt, G. (1970). Humor and inclination to laugh: Emotional reactions to stimuli of different divergence from a range of expectancy.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 11 185–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nerhardt, G. (1975). Rated funniness and dissimilarity of figures: Divergence from expectancy.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 16 156–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nerhardt, G. (1976). Incongruity and funniness: Towards a new descriptive model. In A. J. Chapman & H. C. Foot (Eds.),Humour and laughter: Theory, research, and application (pp. 55–62). London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicki, A. M., & Moss, V. (1975). Preference for nonrepresentational art as a function of various measures of complexity.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 29 237–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nosanchuk, T. A., & Lightstone, J. (1974). Canned laughter and public and private conformity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29 153–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C., Faw, T. T., & Bashford, M. B. (1969). Effects of degrees of incongruity on visual fixations in children and adults.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81 360–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, K., & Chapman, A. J. (1977). Suppression of adult laughter: An experimental approach. In A. J. Chapman & H. C. Foot (Eds.),It's a funny thing, humour (pp. 429–431). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oster, P. J., Stern, J. A., & Figar, S. (1975). Cephalic and digital vasomotor orienting responses: The effect of stimulus intensity and rise time.Psychophysiology, 12 642–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlov, I. P. (1927).Conditioned reflexes: An investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pistole, D. D., & Shor, R. E. (1979). A multivariate study of the effect of repetition on humor appreciation as qualified by two social influence factors.Journal of General Psychology, 100 43–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollio, H. R., & Mers, R. W. (1974). Predictability and the appreciation of comedy.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 4 229–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollio, H. R., Mers, R., & Lucchesi, W. (1972). Humor, laughter, and smiling: Some preliminary observations of funny behaviors. In J. H. Goldstein & P. E. McGhee (Eds.),The psychology of humor (pp. 211–239). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisenzein, R. (1983). The Schachter theory of emotion: Two decades later.Psychological Bulletin, 94 239–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothbart, M. K. (1973). Laughter in young children.Psychological Bulletin, 80 247–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothbart, M. K. (1976). Incongruity, problem solving and laughter. In A. J. Chapman & H. C. Foot (Eds.),Humour and laughter: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 37–54). London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothbart, M. K., & Pien, D. (1977). Elephants and marshmallows: A theoretical syntheses of incongruity-resolution humour. In A. J. Chapman & H. C. Foot (Eds.),It's a funny thing, humour (pp. 37–40). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schachter, S., & Singer, J. E. (1962). Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state.Psychological Review, 69 379–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schick, C., McGlynn, R. P., & Woolam, D. (1972). Perception of cartoon humor as a function of familiarity and anxiety level.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24 22–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. (1972). The effects of arousal on appreciation for varying degrees of sex-relevant humor.Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 6 241–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shultz, T. R. (1972). The role of incongruity and resolution in children's appreciation of cartoon humor.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 13 456–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shurcliff, A. (1968). Judged humor, arousal, and the relief theory.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8 360–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddle, D. A., & Heron, P. A. (1976). Effects of length of training and amount of tone frequency change on amplitude of autonomic components of the orienting response.Psychophysiology, 13 281–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddle, D. A., Kyriacou, C., Heron, P. A., & Matthews, W. A. (1979). Effects of changes in verbal stimuli on the skin conductance response component of the orienting response.Psychophysiology, 16 34–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolov, Y. N. (1963).Perception and the conditioned reflex. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, D., & Siddle, D. A. T. (1976). Effects of “below-zero” habituation on the electrodermal orienting response to a test stimulus.Psychophysiology, 13 10–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suls, J. M. (1972). A two-stage model for the appreciation of jokes and cartoons: An information-processing analysis. In J. H. Goldstein & P. E. McGhee (Eds.),The psychology of humor (pp. 81–100). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svebak, S. (1975). Respiratory patterns as predictors of laughter.Psychophysiology, 12 62–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svebak, S. (1977). Some characteristics of resting respiration as predictors of laughter. In A. J. Chapman & H. C. Foot (Eds.),It's a funny thing, humour (pp. 101–104). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, H. (1971). Discrepancy hypotheses: Methodological and theoretical considerations.Psychological Review, 78 249–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Olst, E. H. (1971).The orienting reflex. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagoner, J. H., & Sullenberger, C. B. (1978). Pupillary size as an indicator of preference in humor.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47 779–782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicker, F. W., Barron, W. I., III, & Willis, A. C. (1980). Disparagement humor: Dispositions and resolutions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39 701–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wierzbicki, M., & Young, R. D. (1978). The relation of intelligence and task difficulty to appreciation of humor.Journal of General Psychology, 99 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, C. P. (1979).Jokes: Form, content, use and function. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaremko, R. M., Blair, M. W., & Leckart, B. T. (1970). The orienting reflex to changes in conceptual stimulus dimension.Psychonomic Science, 21 115–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zigler, E., Levine, J., & Gould, L. (1967). Cognitive challenge as a factor in children's humor appreciation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6 332–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zillmann, D., & Bryant, J. (1974). Retaliatory equity as a factor in humor appreciation.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10 480–488.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Deckers, L., Hricik, D. Orienting and humor responses: A synthesis. Motiv Emot 8, 183–204 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991887

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991887

Keywords

Navigation