Skip to main content
Log in

Using stated response choice data to enrich revealed preference discrete choice models

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is growing interest in exploring the view that both revealed preference (RP) and stated preference (SP) data have useful information and that their integration will enrich the overall explanatory power of RP choice models. These two types of data have been independently used in the estimation of a wide variety of discrete choice applications in marketing. In order to combine the two data sources, each with independent choice outcomes, allowance must be made for their different scaling properties. The approach uses a full information maximum likelihood estimation procedure of the hierarchical logit form to obtain suitable scaling parameters to make one or more data sets comparable. We illustrate the advantages of the dual data strategy by comparing the results with those obtained from models estimated independently with RP and SP data. Data collected as part of a study of high speed rail is used to estimate a set of illustrative mode choice models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bates, J. (1992). “Alternative-specific Constants in Logit Models,” John Bates and Associates, Oxford (mimeo, July).

    Google Scholar 

  • Batsell, R. R., and Louviere, J. J. (1991). “Experimental Analysis of Choice,”Marketing Letters 2(3), 199–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Akiva, M. E., and Lerman, S. (1985).Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Akiva, M. E., and Morikawa, T. (1990). “Estimation of Switching Models from Revealed Preferences and Stated Intentions,”Transportation Research 24A (6), 485–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borsch-Supan, A. (1986).Econometric Analysis of Discrete Choice. Berlin: Springer-Verlaag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, M. A., and Daly, A. J. (1991). “Estimation of Logit Choice Models Using Mixed Stated Preference and Revealed Preference Information.” Paper presented to the6th International Conference on Travel Behavior, Quebec, May 22–24, 1991.

  • Bradley, M. A., and Daly, A. J. (1992). “Uses of the Logit Scaling Approach in Stated Preference Analysis.” Paper presented at the7th World Conference on Transport Research, Lyon, July.

  • Bradley, M. A., and Hensher, D. A. (1992). “Stated Preference Survey.” In Ampt, E. S., Richardson, A. J., and Meyburg, A. H. (eds.),Selected Readings in Transport Survey Methodology. Eucalyptus Press, Melbourne, 31–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunn, H. F., Bradley, M. A., and Hensher, D. A. (1992). “High Speed Rail Market Projection: Survey Design and Analysis”Transportation 19, 117–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensher, D. A. (1986). “Sequential and Full Information Maximum Likelihood Estimation of a Nested Logit Model,”Review of Economics and Statistics LXVIII (4), 657–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensher, D. A. (1991). “Efficient Estimation of Hierarchical Logit Mode Choice Models,”Proc. of Japanese Society of Civil Engineers, No. 425/IV-14, January, 17–28.

  • Hensher, D. A., and Barnard, P. O. (1990). “The Orthogonality Issue in Stated Choice Designs.” In Fischer, M., Nijkamp, P., and Papageorgiou, Y. (eds.),Spatial Choices and Processes. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 265–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensher, D. A., and Johnson, L. W. (1981).Applied Discrete-Choice Modelling. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensher, D. A., Barnard, P. O., and Truong, T. P. (1988). “Some Thoughts on the Role of Stated Preference Methods in Studies of Travel Choice,”Journal of Transport Economics and Policy XXII (1), January, 45–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, J. L. (1984). “Testing Disaggregate Travel Demand Models by Comparing Predicted and Observed Market Shares,”Transportation Research Record 976, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louviere, J. J., and Hensher, D. A. (1983). “Using Discrete Choice Models with Experimental Design Data to Forecast Consumer Demand for Unique Cultural Events,”Journal of Consumer Research 10 (3), 348–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, D. (1981). “Econometric Models of Probabilistic Choice.” In Manski, C. F., and McFadden, D. (eds.).Structural Analysis of Discrete Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 198–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morikawa, T. (1989).Incorporating Stated Preference Data in Travel Demand Analysis. PhD Dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, M.I.T.

  • Morikawa, T., McFadden, D., and Ben-Akiva, M. E. (1990). “Incorporating Psychometric Data in Econometric Travel Demand Models,” Kyoto University Working Paper.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hensher, D.A., Bradley, M. Using stated response choice data to enrich revealed preference discrete choice models. Marketing Letters 4, 139–151 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994072

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994072

Key words

Navigation