Skip to main content
Log in

Implicit theories in policy discourse: An inquiry into the interpretations of reality in German technology policy

  • Published:
Policy Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interpretations of reality are an important, sometimes even decisive, dimension of the policy process. This essay seeks to demonstrate this point in the field of technology policy. Empirical research shows that government support for technology transfer in Germany is based on a concept of technology that is shared by neither companies nor academic researchers. These different concepts become reified interpretations of what ‘technology’ means. They are referred to here as ‘implicit theories.’ Interviews with academic researchers and business people demonstrate how inquiries into the realm of policy theories can be carried out.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albrecht, Günter (1977). ‘Vorüberlegungen zu einer “Theorie sozialer Probleme,”’Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 19: 143–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Peter L. and Thomas Luckmann (1990).Die gesellschaftliche Konstruktion der Wirklichkeit. Eine Theorie der Wissenssoziologie. Frankfurt a.M.: Fischer, 5th ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blume, Stuart S. (1977). ‘Policy as theory: A framework for understanding the contribution of social science to welfare policy,’Acta Sociologica 20: 247–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre (1987).Sozialer Sinn. Kritik der theoretischen Vernunft. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre (1989). ‘Antworten auf einige Einwände,’ in Klaus Eder, ed.,Klassenlage, Lebensstil und kulturelle Praxis: Theoretische und empirische Beiträge zur Auseinandersetzung mit Pierre Boudieus Klassentheorie. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, pp. 395–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundesminister für Forschung und Technologie (BMFT) (1993).Bundesbericht Forschung 1993. Bonn.

  • Drilhon, Gabriel (1991). ‘Choosing priorities in science and technology,’The OECD Observer 170: 4–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellwein, Thomas and Wolfgang Bruder (1982).Innovationsorientierte Regionalpolitik. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, Henry (1983). ‘Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in American academic science,’Minerva 21: 198–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, Henry (1990). ‘The capitalization of knowledge: The decentralization of United States industrial and science policy from Washington to the states,’Theory and Society 19: 107–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feller, Irwin (1990). ‘University-industry R&D relationships’ inJürgen Schmandt and Robert Wilson, eds.,Growth Policy in the Age of High Technology. The Role of Regions and States. Boston: Unwin Hyman, pp. 313–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, Frank and John Forester, eds. (1993).The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, Michael and Björn Wittrock, eds. (1985).Science as a Commodity: Threats to the Open Community of Scholars. Harlow: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gusfield, Joseph R. (1989). ‘Constructing the ownership of social problems: Fun and profit in the welfare state,’Social Problems 36: 431–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hack, Lothar (1988).Vor Vollendung der Tatsachen. Die Rolle von Wissenschaft und Technologie in der dritten Phase der industriellen Revolution. Frankfurt a.M.: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hack, Lothar and Irmgard Hack (1985).Die Wirklichkeit, die Wissen schafft. Zum wechselseitigen Begründungsverhältnis von ‘Verwissenschaftlichung der Industrie’ und ‘Industralisierung der Wissenschaft’. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkesworth, Mary E. (1988).Theoretical Issues in Policy Analysis. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkesworth, Mary E. (1992). ‘The science of politics and the politics of science,’ in Mary E. Hawkesworth and Maurice Kogan eds.,Encyclopedia of Government and Politics. London, New York: Routledge. 1: 5–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heclo, H. Hugh (1972). ‘Review article: Policy analysis,’British Journal of Political Science 2: 83–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, Joachim Jens (1982). ‘Staat, Politik and Bürokratie — eine Einführung,’ in Joachim Jens Hesse ed., Politikwissenschaft und Verwaltungswissenschaft.Politische Vierteljahresschrift. Sonderheft 13: 9–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitzler, Ronald (1993). ‘Verstehen: Alltagspraxis und wissenschaftliches Programm,’ in Thomas Jung and Stefan Müller-Doohm, eds.,‘Wirklichkeit’ im Deutungsprozeß. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, pp. 223–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, Jeanette (1993).Implizite Theorien in der Politik. Interpretationsprobleme regionaler Technologiepolitik. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honer, Anne (1993). ‘Das Perspektivenproblem der Sozialwissenschaften,’ in Thomas Jung and Stefan Müller-Doohm, eds.,‘Wirklichkeit’ im Deutungsprozeß. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, pp. 241–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluge, Norbert and Christoph Oehler (1986).Hochschulen und Forschungstransfer. Bedingungen, Konfigurationen und Handlungsmuster. Kassel: Wissenschaftliches Zentrum für Berufs- und Hochschulforschung Gesamthochschule Kassel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeuw, Frans L. (1991). ‘Policy theories, knowledge utilization, and evaluation,’Knowledge and Policy: The International Journal of Knowledge Transfer 4(3): 73–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowi, Theodore J. (1963/64). ‘American business, public policy, case-studies, and political theory,’World Politics 677–715.

  • Majone, Giandomenico (1980). ‘Policies as theories,’OMEGA: The International Journal of Management Science 8: 151–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majone, Giandomenico (1991). ‘Research programmes and action programmes, or can policy research learn from the philosophy of science?’ in Peter Wagner et al., eds.,Social Sciences and Modern States: National Experiences and Theoretical Crossroads. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 290–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marin, Bernd, ed. (1990).Governance and Generalized Exchange: Self-Organizing Policy Networks in Action. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowery, David C. (1983a). ‘The relationship between intrafirm and contractual forms of industrial research in American manufacturing, 1900–1940,’Explorations in Economic History 20: 351–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowery, David C. (1983b). ‘Economic theory and government technology policy,’Policy Sciences 16: 27–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Richard R. (1986). ‘Institutions supporting technical advance in industry,’American Economic Review 186–189.

  • Nelson, Richard R. (1989). ‘What is private and what is public about technology?’Science, Technology and Human Values 14: 229–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowotny, Helga (1985). ‘Does it only need good men to do good science?’ in Michael Gibbons and Björn Wittrock, eds.Science as a Commodity: Threats to the Open Community of Scholars. Harlow: Longman, pp. 129–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offe, Claus (1977). ‘Die kritische Funktion der Sozialwissenschaften,’ in Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung, ed.,Interaktion von Wissenschaft und Politik. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus, pp. 321–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt, Keith (1987). ‘The objectives of technology policy,’Science and Public Policy 14: 182–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt, Keith (1991). ‘What makes basic research economically useful?’Research Policy 20: 109–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rein, Martin and Donald Schon (1977). ‘Problem setting in policy research,’ in Carol H. Weiss, ed.,Using Social Research in Public Policy Making. Lexington, MA: D.C. Health and Company, pp. 235–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rein, Martin and Donald Schon (1991). ‘Frame-reflective policy discourse,’ in Peter Wagner et al., eds.,Social Sciences and Modern States: National Experiences and Theoretical Crossroads. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 262–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Nicolas and Peter Miller (1992). ‘Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government,’British Journal of Sociology 43: 173–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, Nathan (1982).Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, Nathan and Richard R. Nelson (1994). ‘American universities and technical advance in industry,’Research Policy 23: 323–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, Paul A. (1988). ‘An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein,’Policy Sciences 21: 129–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sättler, Martin and Rainer Röder and Dieter Pfister (1987). ‘Effizienz des Technologie-Transfers: Eine Zwischenbilanz,’ in Lothar Späth et al., eds,Technologietransfer in Konzeption und Praxis. Erfahrungen im Ländervergleich und Vorschläge zur Effiziensteigerung. Stuttgart: Horst Poller Verlag im Verlag Bonn Aktuell, pp. 32–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmandt, Jürgen and Robert Wilson, eds., (1990).Growth Policy in the Age of High Technology: The Role of Regions and States. Boston: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, Klaus and Frank Uwe Fuhrmann and Walter Heering (1991).Wissens- und Technologietransfer. Bedeutung und Perspektive einer regionalen technologiepolitischen Strategie am Beispiel Berlins. Berlin: Duncker and Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Täger, Uwe Christian and Luitpold Uhlmann (1984).Dèr Technologietransfer in der Bundes-republik Deutschland. Grundstrategien auf dem Technologiemarkt. Berlin: Duncker and Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, Peter et al., eds. (1991).Social Sciences and Modern States: National Experiences and Theoretical Crossroads. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, Andrew (1994). ‘International evaluation of academic-industry relations: Contexts and analysis,’Science and Public Policy 21: 72–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windhoff-Héritier, Adrienne (1987).Policy-Analyse. Eine Einführung. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinberg, Dorothy (1985). ‘The legacy of success: Changing relationships in university-based scientific research in the United States,’ in Michael Gibbons and Björn Wittrock, eds.,Science as a Commodity: Threats to the Open Community of Scholars. Harlow: Longman, pp. 107–127.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hofmann, J. Implicit theories in policy discourse: An inquiry into the interpretations of reality in German technology policy. Policy Sci 28, 127–148 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999672

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999672

Keywords

Navigation