Skip to main content
Log in

Employee pregnancy: The impact on organizations, pregnant employees and co-workers

  • Full Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Perceptions of current and appropriate practices, and behavioral intentions regarding the treatment of pregnant employees were examined utilizing the “Pregnancy in the Workplace” questionnaire. Subjects believed employing organizations should provide more supportive maternity leave policies and should seek to minimize negative career impacts (e.g., reduced promotional opportunities) on pregnant employees. However, subjects also felt employers were too generous in making workload reductions for pregnant employees. While subjects believed more should be done to assist pregnant employees, they were unwilling to agree to support such actions with their personal behaviors. Opinions varied as a function of sex, age, and nationality of the respondent, as well as supervisory experience with a pregnant employee. Women, younger employees, non-U.S. citizens, and those without experience supervising a pregnant employee were significantly more supportive of pregnant employees, and indicated greater support for legislation to assist pregnant employees.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bass, B.M., Cascio, W.F., & O'Connor E.J. (1975). Magnitude estimations of expressions of frequency and amount.Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 313–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, A. (1987, February 2). Business and pregnancy: Good will is no longer enough.Business Week. pp. 37.

  • Brophy, B. (1986, March 10). Expectant moms, office dilemma.U.S. News & World Report, pp. 52–53.

  • Corse, S.J. (1987, August).How a Manager's pregnancy effects subordinates interacting with her, Paper presented at the National meetings of the American Psychological Association, New York, NY.

  • Ehrlich, E. (1989, March 20). The Mommy Track.Business Week, pp. 126–134.

  • Franco, K., Evans, C., Best, A., Zrull, J., and Pizza, G. Conflicts associated with physicians' pregnancies.American Journal of Psychiatry, 140 902–904.

  • Krett, K. (1985, June). Maternity, paternity, and child care policies.Personnel Administrator, p 125–136, 218.

  • Lissitz, R. W., & Green, S. B. (1975). Effect on the number of scale points on reliability: A Monte Carlo approach.Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 10–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raines, L.J. & Push, S.P. (1986, May–June). Protecting pregnant workers.Harvard Business Review, pp. 26–29.

  • Randall, D.M. (1987, September). Protecting the unborn.Personnel Administrator, pp. 88–97.

  • Schwartz, F.N. (1989, January–February) Management women and the new facts of life.Harvard Business Review, pp. 65–76.

  • Sullivan, G.M. (1987, October). Pregnancy discrimination: A state or national policy.Labor Law Journal, 665–671.

  • Waite, L.J., Haggstrom, G.W. & Kanouse, D.E. (1985) Changes in the employment activities of new parents.American Sociological Review, 50 263–272.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gueutal, H.G., Taylor, E.M. Employee pregnancy: The impact on organizations, pregnant employees and co-workers. J Bus Psychol 5, 459–476 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01014495

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01014495

Keywords

Navigation