Skip to main content
Log in

The positive and negative effects of marketing on socioeconomic development: The Turkish case

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Consumer Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Some observations and thoughts about domestic and international interactions between marketing and economic, sociopolitical, and cultural factors are presented using Turkish examples. These interactions are discussed in terms of satisfaction of the needs (having, actualization, and social) of the three parties that seem to be differentially influenced by marketing: over- and underprivileged individuals, the society, and the businesses. In particular, the attention is drown to the fact that whereas marketing has had mainly positive effects on the country's privileged consumers, the poor consumers have seldom benefitted. The author suggests a number of actions, to be taken by business and non-business organizations, that could increase the need satisfaction of each of the parties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andreasen, A. R. (1983). Cost-conscious marketing research.Harvard Business Review, 61(4), 74–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976).Social indicators of well-being. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arndt, J. (1978). The quality of life challenge to marketing. In: F. D. Reynolds & H. C. Barksdale (Eds.),Marketing and the quality of life, pp. 1–10. Chicago: American Marketing Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babüroğlu, O., & Ravn, I. (1992). Normative action research.Organization Studies, 13(1), 19–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baloğlu, Z. (1990).Türkiye'de Eğitim: Sorunlar ve DeğiŞime Yapisal Uyum önerileri (Education in Turkey: Problems and recommendations for structural adaptation for change). Istanbul: TüSIAD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R. W. (1985). Materialism: Trait aspects of living in the material world.Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 265–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R. W. (1988a). Possessions and the extended self.Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 139–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R. W. (1988b). Third world consumer culture. In: E. Kumcu & A. F. Firat (Eds.), Marketing and development: Toward broader dimensions,Research in Marketing, Supplement 4, pp. 103–127. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, M., & Crosby, F. (1980). An empirical examination of relative deprivation theory.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 442–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodur, M., & ÇavuŞgil, S. T. (1985). Export market research orientations of Turkish firms.European Journal of Marketing, 19(2), 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borak, E. (1990).“Tüketiyoruz ama Ne Pahasina” Paneli (Panel on “We are consuming — but at the expense of what?”). April 12, 1990, BoğaziÇi üniversitesi, Istanbul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Business Outlook Abroad: Turkey (1987).Business America, November 9, pp. 21–22.

  • ÇavuŞgil, S. T. (1990). The new realities of the global marketplace: Implications for Turkish companies.Symposium on New Strategies in International Marketing, pp. D1-D11. Istanbul: TüSIAD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. D., & Curtin, T. R. (1987). The mainstream and the underclass: Why are the differences so salient and the similarities so unobtrusive? In: J. C. Masters & W. P. Smith (Eds.),Social comparison, social justice and relative deprivation: Theoretical, empirical and policy perspectives, pp. 218–264. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. D., & Pearlman, B. (1981). The relationship of economic growth to inequality in the distribution of income. In: M. J. Lerner & S. C. Lerner (Eds.),The justice motive in social behavior, pp. 359–389. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czepiel, J. A. (1978). Marketing, customer satisfaction, and the quality of life. In: F. D. Reynolds & H. C. Barksdale (Eds.),Marketing and the quality of life, pp. 1–10. Chicago: American Marketing Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dholakia, N. (1988). The marketing of development: An exploration of strategic forms of development. In: E. Kumcu & A. F. Firat (Eds.), Marketing and development: Toward broader dimensions.Research in Marketing, Supplement 4, pp. 63–78. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dholakia, N., & Firat, A. F. (1988). Development in the era of globalizing markets and consumption patterns. In: E. Kumcu & A. F. Firat (Eds.), Marketing and development: Toward broader dimensions.Research in Marketing, Supplement 4, pp. 79–101. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dholakia, N., & Sherry, J. F. Jr. (1987). Marketing and development: A resynthesis of knowledge.Research in Marketing, 9, 119–143. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dholakia, R. R., Sharif, M., & Bandari, L. (1988). Consumption in the third world: Challenges for marketing and development. In: E. Kumcu & A. F. Firat (Eds.), Marketing and development: Toward broader dimensions.Research in Marketing, Supplement 4, pp. 129–149. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.DPT Gelir Dağilimi Raporu (Report on income distribution) (1987). Ankara: DPT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erem, T. (1989). Legal environments of distribution channels in Turkey.Journal of International Marketing and Marketing Research, 14(2), 59–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erem, T. (1990). An assessment of Turkish export performance: Global perspectives and prospects.Symposium on New Strategies in International Marketing, pp. B1-B22. Istanbul: TüSIAD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firat, A. F., Kumcu, E., & Karafakioğlu, M. (1988). The interface between marketing and development: Problems and prospects. In: E. Kumcu & A. F. Firat (Eds.), Marketing and development: Toward broader dimensions.Research in Marketing, Supplement 4, pp. 317–343. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garza, C. E. (1991). Studying the natives on the shop floor.Business Week International, September 30, pp. 48–49.

  • Ger, G., & Belk, R. W. (1990). Measuring and comparing materialism cross-culturally. In: G. Gorn, M. Goldberg, & R. Pollay (Eds.),Advances in Consumer Research, 17, 186–192. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, R. H., & Abernathy, W. J. (1980). Managing our way to economic decline.Harvard Business Review, 58(4), 67–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, F., GrØnhaug, K., & WÄrneryd, K.-E. (1990). Excellent marketing: The concept, its measurement and implications.Marketing and Research Today, 18, 98–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaynak, E. (1986).Marketing and development. New York, NY: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiray, M. (1990). Tek Şansimiz Köylülüğü Bitirmek (Our only chance is to end peasant mentality).Cumhuriyet, September 9, p. 10.

  • Kelley, E. J. (1974). Integrating social feedback into business decisions: Value system conflicts and corporate planning. In: R. L. Clewett & J. C. Olson (Eds.),Social indicators and marketing, pp. 129–145. Chicago: American Marketing Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, J. (1988).Marketing in developing countries. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P. (1987). Humanistic marketing: Beyond the marketing concept. In: A. F. Firat, N. Dholakia, & R. P. Bagozzi (Eds.),Philosophical and radical thought in marketing, pp. 271–288. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumcu, E., Firat, A. F., Karafakioglu, M., Karabulut, M., & Oluc, M. (Eds.) (1986).Proceedings of the International Conference on Marketing and Development. Muncie, IN: Ball State University; Istanbul, Turkey: Istanbul University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, K. C. (1975). Social indicator models: An overview. In: K. C. Land & S. Spilerman (Eds.),Social indicator models, pp. 5–36. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, S. (1991).Marketing approaches to development. Paper presented at the Third International Conference on Marketing and Development, January 4–7, 1991, New Delhi, India.

  • Papanek, V. (1973).Design for the real world. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1985). How information gives you a competitive advantage.Harvard Business Review, 63(4), 149–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, E. B., & Parke, R. (1975). Social indicators.Science, 188, 693–699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherry, J. F. (1989). Marketing and development: A review essay.Journal of Macromarketing, 9(2), 65–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • TüSIAD (1991a).21. Yüzyila Doğru Türkiye: Geleceğe Dönük Bir Atihm Stratejisi (Turkey towards the 21st century: A future oriented strategy). Istanbul: TüSIAD.

    Google Scholar 

  • TüSIAD (1991b).Türk Toplumunun Değerleri (Values of the Turkish society). Istanbul: TüSIAD.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1991).World development report. Oxford: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ger, G. The positive and negative effects of marketing on socioeconomic development: The Turkish case. J Consum Policy 15, 229–254 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01017575

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01017575

Keywords

Navigation