Skip to main content
Log in

Statistical treatment of experimental errors in the fission track dating method

  • Published:
Journal of the International Association for Mathematical Geology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The major stochastic elements in the fission track dating method are (i) the number of spontaneous fission tracks (N s ) in a sample, and (ii) the number of induced tracks (N i ) observed when the sample is irradiated with neutrons. The foundations for the statistical uncertainty in these measures are of two kinds: (i) there exists a definite probability of uranium fission by means of natural decay and by neutron activation, and (ii) within a crystal the distribution of uranium is not uniform and perhaps follows something like a Poisson law. In any event, the natural logarithm of the ratio (N s /N i ) is proportional to age. A plausible statistical fission track dating model should, therefore, start by considering the joint distribution of N s and N i . In this paper a joint bivariate normal model is described which allows the rigorous definition of the probability distributions of Ns, N i , the ratio N s /N i , and age itself. A general computer program (FISSION) has been developed to perform all the necessary computations. By accounting for the correlation between N s and N i , the statistical model here ascribes smaller standard errors to N s /N i (and therefore age) than do previous methods. In addition, the error associated with neutron flux is a significant factor in the age relationships and has been incorporated into the model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Fieller, E. C., 1932, Distribution of the index in a normal bivariate population, Biometrika,24 p. 428–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleischer, R. L., Price, P. B., and Walker, R. M., 1965, Tracks of charged particles in solids, Science,149 p. 383–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedlander, G. and Kennedy, J. W., 1949, Introduction to radiochemistry, Wiley, New York, 412 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, R, Armani, R. J., and Roberts, J. H., 1968, Absolute fission rate measurements with solid-state track recorders, Nuclear Sci. Eng.,34 p. 13–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey, D. A., Naeser, C. W., and Shawe, D. R., 1975, Age of volcanism, intrusion and mineralization in the Thomas Range, Key Mountain and Desert Mountain, Western Utah, Jour. Res. U.S. Geol. Sur.,3 no. 5, p. 597–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tahirkheli, R. A. K. and Naeser, C. W., 1975, Zircon fission track age of post ranch ash bed near Besnon, Arizona, Ariz. Acad. Sci.,10 no. 2, p. 111–113.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McGee, V.E., Johnson, N.M. Statistical treatment of experimental errors in the fission track dating method. Mathematical Geology 11, 255–268 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01034992

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01034992

Key words

Navigation