Skip to main content
Log in

Overcoring in highly stressed granite: Comparison of USBM and modified CSIR devices

  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

An overcoring program in three nearly orthogonal boreholes, intersecting the same rock volume, was carried out in highly stressed Lac du Bonnet granite at the 240-m level of the Underground Research Laboratory (URL). The program was designed to determine if the more commonly used United States Bureau of Mines borehole deformation gauge (USBM gauge) gave similar in situ stress results as a modified Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) triaxial strain cell. A total of 15 successful USBM tests and 17 successful CSIR tests were carried out. The measured mean stress tensor for the USBM results fell within the 90% confidence limits for the CSIR results.

The measured CSIR stress tensors were slightly influenced by the orientation of the boreholes, although this phenomenon may be site specific as it is probably related to the amount of stress-induced microcracking that occurs during the overcoring process. The results of the program provided sufficient confidence in the modified CSIR cell to warrant using it as the main overcoring device for future URL overcoring programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amadei, B., Goodman, R. E. (1982): The influence of rock anisotropy on stress measurements by overcoring techniques. Rock Mechanics 15 (4), 167–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brace, W. F., Silver, E., Hadley, K., Goetze, C. (1972): Cracks and pores: a closer look. Science 178, 162–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chernis, P. J. (1984): Comparison of the pore-microcrack structure of shallow and deep samples of the Lac du Bonnet Granite. AECL Technical Record, TR-223, Chalk River, Ontario, 1–20.

  • Dyke, C. G., Hyett, A. J., Hudson, J. A. (1987): A preliminary assessment of correct reduction of field measurement data: scalars, vectors and tensors. In: Sakurai, S. (ed.), Proc. 2nd Int. Symp. on Field Measurements in Geomechanics, Kobe, Vol. 2, 1085–1095.

  • Garrity, P., Irvon, R. A., Farmer, I. W. (1985): Problems associated with near surface in situ stress measurements by overcoring method. In: Proc. 26th U. S. Symp. on Rock Mechanics, Rapid City, SD, 1095–1102.

  • Hooker, V. E., Bickel D. L. (1974): Overcoring equipment and techniques used in rock stress determination. United States Bureau of Mines, Department of the Interior, USBM IC 8618. Washington, 32 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooker, V. E., Aggson, J. R., Bickel, D. L. (1975): Improvements in three-component borehole deformation gauge and overcoring techniques. United States Bureau of Mines, Department of the Interior, USBM RI 7894. Washington, 29 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katsube, T. J., Hume, J. P. (1987): Geotechnical studies at Whiteshell Research Area (RA-3). Canada Centre for Mineral and Energy Technology Mining Research Laboratories Divisional Report, MRL 87-52.

  • Lang, P. A., Thompson, P. M., Ng, L. K. W. (1986): The effect of residual stress and drill holes size on the in situ stress determined by overcoring. In: Stephansson, O. (ed.), Proc. of the Int. Symp. on rock stress and rock stress measurements, Stockholm, 687–694.

  • Leeman, E. R. (1968): The determination of the complete state of stress in a single borehole — Laboratory and underground measurements. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 5, 31–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C. D., Christiansson, R. (1991): Overcoring in highly stressed granite: The influence of microcracking. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 28 (1), 53–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obert, L., Duvall, W. I. (1967): Rock Mechanics and the design of structures in rock. J. Wiley, New York, 413–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panek, L. A. (1966): Calculation of the average ground stress components from measurements of the diametral deformation of a drillhole. United States Bureau of Mines Report RI 6732, 41 pp.

  • Patrick, W. C. (1986): Spent fuel test-climax: An evaluation of the technical feasibility of geologic storage of spent nuclear fuel in granite. Report prepared by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory for the Nevada Nuclear Waste Storage Investigations Project. Report No. UCRL-53702.

  • Pine, R. J., Tanbridge, L. W., Kwakwa, K. (1983): In situ stress measurements in the Carnmenellis Granite — I. Overcoring tests at South Crofty Mine at a depth of 790 m. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 20 (2), 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snider, G. R., Lang, P. A., Thompson, P. M. (1989): Procedures used for overcore testing during sinking of the URL shaft. AECL Technical Record, TR-389, Chalk River, Ontario, 32 pp.

  • Thompson, P. M., Baumgartner, P., Lang, P. A. (1984): Planned construction phase geomechanics experiments at the Underground Research Laboratory. In: Proc. of NEA/OCED Workshop on the Design and Instrumentation of in situ experiments in underground laboratories for radioactive waste disposal, Brussels.

  • Thompson, P. M., Larg, P. A., Snider, G. R. (1986): Recent improvements to in situ stress measurements using the overcoring method. In: Proc. 39th Canadian Geotechnical Conf., Ottawa, 143–150.

  • Thompson, P. M., Lang, P. A. (1987): Geomechanical instrumentation applications at the Canadian Underground Research Laboratory. In: Sakurai, S. (ed.), Proc. 2nd Int. Symp. on Field Measurements in Geomechanics, Kobe. Vol. I, 963–983.

  • Walker, J. R., Martin, C. D., Dzik, E. J. (1990): Confidence intervals for in situ stress measurements. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 27, 139–141.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martin, C.D., Christiansson, R.C. Overcoring in highly stressed granite: Comparison of USBM and modified CSIR devices. Rock Mech Rock Engng 24, 207–235 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01045032

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01045032

Keywords

Navigation