Skip to main content
Log in

Utility maximizing bureaucrats: The bureaucrat's point of view

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we develop a model to examine the extent to which bureaucrats are maximizing their own utility. In the spirit of Williamson (1964) and Simon (1957), we assume that bureaucrats are utility maximizers but not necessarily cost minimizers and we investigate how well the bureaucrat is doing in relation to his own goals.

First, we hypothesize a utility function for the bureaucrat — we assume that the bureaucrat gains utility from producing municipal services as well as from hiring additional labor and capital. Then, using the concept of money metric utility, we determine the minimum expenditure necessary to achieve the same level of utility actually observed. Secondly, we determine the bureaucrat's distance from the utility maximizing choice of resources for a given level of expenditure. Finally, using a sample of public sector bureaucrats we attempt to explain the variation in wasted expenditure across municipalities and why bureaucrats might be underutilizers of each input relative to their own utility maximizing point.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afriat, S. (1967). The construction of a utility function from expenditure data.International Economic Review 8: 67–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. and Hayes, K. (1993). The demand for good government.Review of Economics and Statistics 75: 148–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosskopf, S. and Hayes, K. (1993). Local public bureaucrats and their input choices.Journal of Urban Economics 33: 151–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, K. (1992). Measuring the cost of bureaucratic inefficiency. Working Paper #8911, Department of Economics, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • International City Management Association. (1982–1986).Municipal year book. Washington, DC: ICMA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. (1948).Principles of economics. 8th ed. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Vasquez, J. and Sjoquist, D.L. (1988). Property tax financing, renting and the level of expenditures.Southern Economic Journal 55 (October): 424–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Migué, J.L. and Bélanger, G. (1974). Toward a general theory of mangerial discretion.Public Choice 17 (Spring): 27–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. (1957).Models of man. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. (1959). Theories of decision making in economics and behavioral science.American Economic Review 49 (June): 253–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, V.A. (1961).Modern organization. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varian, H. (1990). Goodness of fit in demand analysis.Journal of Econometrics 46: 125–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. (1964). The economics of discretionary behavior: Managerial objectives in a theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hayes, K., Wood, L.L. Utility maximizing bureaucrats: The bureaucrat's point of view. Public Choice 82, 69–83 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01047730

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01047730

Keywords

Navigation