Abstract
Discussions on the problems of the welfare state are increasingly framed in terms of citizenship rather than social justice. The popularity of the concept of citizenship raises the question of its implications for social justice theory and research. In this article it is argued that whereas the dominant approach in social justice is essentially individualistic, the concept of citizenship focuses rather on individuals as members of a societal community, from which both rights and obligations are derived. This focus on communal membership suggests three important topics for social justice theory and research: (i) the need to distinguish between a civic and a justice motive for human behavior, (ii) the need to specify the frame of reference respondents should use when they make their justice judgments, and (iii) the need to recognize the fact that justice judgments may result from both adhering to criteria of justice and considering the consequences of their application.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, J. S. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity.J. Abn. Soc. Psychol. 67: 422–436.
Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 2, Academic Press, New York, pp. 267–299.
Alves, W., and Rossi, P. (1978). Who should get what? Fairness judgments of the distribution of earnings.Am. J. Sociol. 84: 541–564.
Alwin, D. F. (1987). Distributive justice and satisfaction with material well-being.Am. Sociol. Rev. 52: 83–95.
Bellah, R., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swiddler, A., and Tipton, S. M. (1985).Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life, Harper & Row, New York.
Berger, J. Zelditch, M. Jr., Anderson, B., and Cohen, B. P. (1972). Structural aspects of distributive justice: A status value formulation. In Berger, J., Zelditch, M. Jr., Anderson, B. (eds.),Sociological Theories in Progress, Vol. 2, Houghton-Mifflin, Boston, pp. 119–146.
Bernts, T. (1988). Sanctioning risky life-styles?Soc. Justice Res. 2: 249–262.
Berting, J. (1990). Societal change, human rights and the welfare state in Europe. In Berting, J.,et al. (eds.),Human Rights in a Pluralist World: Individuals and Collectivities, Meckler, London.
Berting, J. (1991). Nederlanders over de betekenis van individuele arbeidsprestaties [The Dutch about the meaning of individual work-related achievements]. In d'Anjou, L., and Bernts, T. (eds.),Presteren en Verdelen in Nederland: Over Individuele Belangen en Maatschappelijke Solidariteit [Achieving and Distributing in the Netherlands: On Individual Interests and Social Solidarity], Boom, Meppel/Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 129–150.
Cohen, R. L., and Greenberg, J. (1982). The justice concept in social psychology. In Greenberg, J., and Cohen, R. L. (eds.),Equity and Justice in Social Behavior, Academic Press, New York, pp. 1–41.
Cook, K. S. (1975). Expectations, evaluations, and equity.Am. Sociol. Rev. 40: 372–388.
Cook, K. S. (1987). Toward a more interdisciplinary research agenda: The potential contributions of sociology.Soc. Justice Res. 1: 5–18.
Cook, K. S., and Hegtved, K. A. (1983). Distributive justice, equity, and equality.Ann. Rev. Sociol. 9: 217–241.
Cook, K. S., and Yamagishi, T. (1983). Social determinants of equity judgments: The problem of multidimensional input. In Messick, D. M., and Cook, K. S. (eds.),Equity Theory: Psychological and Sociological Perspectives, Praeger, New York, pp. 95–126.
Dahrendorf, R. (1988).The Modern Social Conflict: An Essay on the Politics of Liberty, University of California Press, Berkeley.
Deutsch, M. (1985).The Social Psychology of Justice, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
Deutsch, M., and Steil, J. (1988). Awakening the sense of injustice.Soc. Justice Res. 2: 3–23.
Durkheim, E. (1893/1984).The Division of Labour in Society, MacMillan, London.
Engbersen, G. (1990).Publieke Bijstandsgeheimen: Het Ontstaan van een Onderklasse in Nederland [Public Welfare Secrets: The Emergence of an Underclass in the Netherlands], Stenfert Kroese, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Etzioni, A. (1988). I & we: The case for the responsive community.Soc. Justice Res. 2: 81–94.
Gartrell, C. D. (1985). Relational and distributional models of collective justice sentiments.Soc. Forces 64: 64–83.
Gilligan, C. (1982).In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Griffith, W. I. (1990). The effect of inputs and performance outcomes on allocation decisions.Soc. Justice Res. 4: 35–47.
Hechter, M. (1987).Principles of Group Solidarity, University of California Press, Los Angeles.
Hermkens, P. (1983).Oordelen over de Rechtvaardigheid van Inkomens [Judgments on the Fairness of Incomes], Kobra, Amsterdam. The Netherlands.
Hermkens, P. L. J., and Boerman, F. A. (1989). Consensus with respect to the fairness of incomes: Differences between social groups.Soc. Justice Res. 3: 201–215.
Hochschild, J. (1981).What's Fair? American Beliefs about Distributive Justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Homans, G. C. (1961).Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms, Harcourt Brace & World, New York.
Homans, G. C. (1964). Bringing men back in.Am. Sociol. Rev. 29: 809–818.
Jasso, G. (1978). On the justice of earnings: a new specification of justice evaluation function.Am. J. Sociol. 83: 1398–1419.
Jasso, G. (1980). A new theory of distributive justice.Am. Sociol. Rev. 45: 3–32.
Jasso, G. (1989). The theory of the distributive-justice force in human affairs: Analyzing the three central questions. In Berger, J., Zelditch, M., Jr., and Anderson, B. (eds.),Sociological Theories in Progress: New Formulations, Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 354–387.
Jasso, G., and Rossi, P. (1977). Distributive justice and earned income.Am. Sociol. Rev. 42: 639–651.
Kluegel, J., and Smith, E. (1986).Beliefs About Inequality: American's Views of What is What Ought to Be, Aldine De Gruyter, New York.
Kohlberg, L. (1981).Essays on Moral Development, University of California Press, San Francisco.
Lerner, M. J. (1975). The justice motive in social behavior: An introduction.J. Soc. Issues 31: 1–19.
Lerner, M. J. (1977). The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms.J. Pers. 45:1–52.
Lerner, M. J. (1987). Integrating societal and psychological rules of entitlement: The basic task of each social actor and fundamental problem for the social sciences.Soc. Justice Res. 1: 107–125.
MacIntyre, A. (1988).Whose Justice, Which Rationality?, Duckworth, London.
Markovsky, B. (1985). Toward a multilevel distributive justice theory.Am. Sociol. Rev. 50: 822–839.
Marshall, T. H. (1965). Citizenship and social class. In Marshall, T. H.,Class, Citizenship and Social Development, Doubleday & Company, New York, pp. 71–134.
Martin, J., and Murray, A. (1983). Distributive injustice and unfair exchange. In Messick, D. M., and Cook, K. S. (eds.),Equity Theory: Psychological and Sociological Perspectives, Praeger, New York, pp. 169–205.
Mead, L. M. (1986).Beyond Entitlement: The Social Obligations of Citizenship, Free Press, New York.
Mishra, R. (1981).Society and Social Policy: Theories and Practice of Welfare, MacMillan, Houndmills, England.
Offe, C. (1991). A non-productivistic design for social policies. Paper presented at the Conference “Quality of Citizenship,” March 20–22 1991, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Rawls, J. (1973).A Theory of Justice, Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.
Robinson, R., and Bell, W. (1978). Equality, success, and social justice in England and the United States.Am. Sociol. Rev. 43: 125–143.
Runciman, W. G. (1966).Relative Deprivation and Social Justice: A Study of Attitudes to Social Inequality in Twentieth Century England, University of California Press, Berkeley.
Rytina, S. (1986). Sociology and justice. In Cohen, R. L. (ed.),Justice: Views from the Social Sciences, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 117–151.
Schuyt, C. (1983).Tussen Macht en Moraal: Over de Plaats van het Recht in Verzorgingsstaat en Democratie [Between Power and Morality: On the Position of Law in Welfare State and Democracy], Samsom, Alphen a/d Rijn, The Netherlands.
Shepelak, N. (1989). Ideological stratification: American beliefs about economic justice.Soc. Justice Res. 3: 217–231.
Shepelak, N., and Alwin, D. (1986). Beliefs about inequality and perceptions of distributive justice.Am. Sociol. Rev. 51: 30–46.
Steijn, B., and De Witte, M. (1991). Klasssepositie en opvattingen over sociale rechtvaardigheid [Class position and attitudes toward social justice]. In d'Anjou, L., and Bernts, T. (eds.),Presteren en Verdelen in Nederland: Over Individuele Belangen en Maatschappelijke Solidariteit [Achieving and Distributing in The Netherlands: On Individual Interests and Social Solidarity], Boom, Meppel/Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 111–128.
Stolte, J. (1987). The formation of justice norms.Am. Sociol. Rev. 52: 774–784.
Tallman, J., and Ihinger-Tallman, M. (1979). Values, distributive justice and social change.Am. Sociol. Rev. 44: 216–235.
Titmuss, R. (1970).The Gift Relationship: From Human Blood to Social Policy, Allen and Unwin, London.
Törnblom, K. Y., and Foa, U. G. (1983). Choice of a distribution principle: Crosscultural evidence on the effects of resources.Acta Sociol. 26: 161–173.
Turner, B. (1990). Outline of a theory of citizenship.Sociology 24(2): 189–217.
Walster, E., Berscheid, E., and Walster, G. W. (1973). New directions in equity research.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 25: 151–176.
Walzer, M. (1983).Spheres of Justice: A Defence of Pluralism and Equality, Martin Robertson, Oxford, England.
Wilensky, H. L. (1975).The Welfare State and Equality: Structural and Ideological Roots of Public Expenditures, University of California Press, Berkeley.
Wilson, W. J. (1987).The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Wolfe, A. (1989). Market, state, and society as codes of moral obligation.Acta Sociol. 32: 221–236.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bernts, T., d'Anjou, L. & Houtman, D. Citizenship and social justice. Soc Just Res 5, 195–212 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048707
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048707