Abstract
To highlight the advances and limitations in the study of organizational justice as reflected by the articles in this issue, the field is characterized as being in its intellectual adolescence. Following this analogy, some signs of scientific maturity are noted. Among these are (a) increased attention to the connections between organizational justice and various organizational processes, (b) expanded efforts toward conceptual refinement, and (c) greater reliance on research conducted in natural settings. At the same time, the adolescent state of the field is also marked by its intellectual awkwardness and immaturity. Indications of this include (a) the absence of guiding theory, (b) an underdeveloped research agenda, and (c) an overreliance on the use of ad hoc measurements. Based on these limitations, suggestions are made for ways of nurturing the field's development. The article concludes with an optimistic vision of tomorrow's field of organizational justice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 2, Academic Press, New York.
Alexander, S., and Ruderman, M. (1987). The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior.Soc. Just. Res. 1: 177–198.
Bies, R. (1987). The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage. In Cummings, L. L., and Staw, B. M. (eds.),Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 9, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 289–318.
Bies, R. J., and Shapiro, D. L. (1987). Interactional fairness judgments: The influence of causal accounts.Soc. Just. Res. 1: 199–218.
Brockner, J., and Greenberg, J. (1990). The impact of layoffs on survivors: An organizational justice perspective. In Carroll, J. (ed.),Advances in Applied Social Psychology: Business Settings, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York, pp. 45–75.
Cartwright, D. (1971). Risk taking by individuals and groups: An assessment of research employing choice dilemmas.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 20: 361–370.
Earley, P. C., and Lituchy, T. R. (1991). Delineating goal and efficacy effects: A test of three models.J. Appl. Psychol. 76: 81–98.
Folger, R. (1986). Rethinking equity theory: A referent cognitions model. In Bierhof, H. W., Cohen, R. L., and Greenberg, J. (eds.),Justice in Social Relations, Plenum, New York, pp. 145–162.
Folger, R. (1987). Formulating the preconditions of resentment: A referent cognitions model. In Masters, J. C., and Smith, W. C. (eds.),Social Comparison, Justice, and Relative Deprivation: Theoretical, Empirical, and Policy Perspectives, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 183–215.
Folger, R., and Konovsky, M. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions.Acad. Manage. J. 32: 115–130.
Greenberg, J. (1982). Approaching equity and avoiding inequity in groups and organizations. In Greenberg, J., and Cohen, R. L. (eds.),Equity and Justice in Social Behavior, Academic Press, New York, pp. 389–435.
Greenberg, J. (1986). Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations.J. Appl. Psychol. 71: 340–342.
Greenberg, J. (1987a). A taxonomy of organizational justice theories.Acad. Manage. Rev. 12: 9–22.
Greenberg, J. (1987b). Reactions to procedural injustice in payment allocations: Do the ends justify the means?J. Appl. Psychol. 72: 55–61.
Greenberg, J. (1988a). Cultivating an image of justice: Looking fair on the job.Acad. Manage. Exec. 2: 155–158.
Greenberg, J. (1988b). Equity and workplace status: A field experiment.J. Appl. Psychol. 73: 606–613.
Greenberg, J. (1989). Cognitive re-evaluation of outcomes in response to underpayment inequity.Acad. Manage. J. 32: 174–184.
Greenberg, J. (1990a). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow.J. Manage. 16: 399–432.
Greenberg, J. (1990b). Looking fair vs. being fair: Managing impressions of organizational justice. In Staw, B. M., and Cummings, L. L. (eds.),Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 12, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 111–157.
Greenberg, J. (1990c). Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden cost of pay cuts.J. Appl. Psychol. 75: 561–568.
Greenberg, J. (1991). Using explanations to manage impressions of performance appraisal fairness.Employ. Respons. Rights J. 4: 51–60.
Greenberg, J. (in press). The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. In Cropanzano, R. (ed.),Justice in the Workplace: Approaching Fairness in Human Resource Management, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
Greenberg, J. (1992b, August). Concept development in organizational behavior: The case of procedural justice. Paper presented at the Meeting of the Academy of Management, Las Vegas, NV.
Greenberg, J. (1993). Stealing in the name of justice: Informational and interpersonal moderators of theft reactions to underpayment inequity.Organ. Behav. Hum. Decision Proces. 54: 81–103.
Greenberg, J., and Folger, R. (1983). Procedural justice, participation, and the fair process effect in groups and organizations. In Paulus, P. B. (ed.),Basic Group Processes, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 235–256.
Greenberg, J., and McCarty, C. (1990). Comparable worth: A matter of justice. In Ferris, G. R., and Rowland, K. M. (eds.),Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Vol. 8, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 265–301.
Greenberg, J., and Ornstein, S. (1983). High status job title as compensation for underpayment: A test of equity theory.J. Appl. Psychol. 68: 285–297.
Greenberg, J., and Tyler, T. R. (1987). Why procedural justice in organizations?Soc. Just. Res. 1: 143–160.
Greenberg, J., Eskew, D. E., and Miles, J. (1991, August). Adherence to participatory norms as a moderator of the fair process effect: When voice does not enhance procedural justice. Paper presented at the meeting of the Academy of Management, Miami Beach, FL.
Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In Gergen, K., Greenberg, M., and Willis, R. (eds.),Social Exchange, Plenum, New York, pp. 27–55.
Locke, E. A., and Latham, G. P. (1990).A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance, Prentice-Hall, New York.
Locke, E. A., Shaw, K. N., Saari, L. M., and Latham, G. P. (1981). Goal setting and task performance: 1969–1980.Psychol. Bull. 90: 125–152.
Mikula, G., Petrick, B., and Tanzer, N. (1990). What people regard as unjust: Types and structures of everyday experiences of injustice.Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 20: 133–149.
Pruitt, D. G. (1971). Choice shifts in group discussion: An introductory review.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 20: 339–360.
Roznowski, M., and Hulin, C. (1992). The scientific merit of valid measures of general constructs with special reference to job satisfaction and job withdrawal. In Cranny, C. J., Smith, P. C., and Stone, E. F. (eds.),Job Satisfaction, Lexington Books, New York, pp. 123–163.
Rubin, J. Z., and Brown, B. R. (1975).The Social Psychology of Bargaining and Negotiation, Academic Press, New York.
Sheppard, B. H., and Lewicki, R. J. (1987). Toward general principles of managerial fairness.Soc. Just. Res. 1: 161–176.
Tyler, T. R., and Caine, A. (1981). The role of distributional and procedural fairness in the endorsement of formal leaders.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 441: 642–655.
Tyler, R., and Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In Zanna, M. (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 25, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 115–192.
Thibaut, J., and Walker, L. (1975).Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
Walster, E., Walster, G. W., and Berscheid, E.Equity: Theory and Research, Allyn & Bacon, Boston.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Greenberg, J. The intellectual adolescence of organizational justice: You've come a long way, maybe. Soc Just Res 6, 135–148 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048736
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048736