Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Popularity functions based on the partisan theory

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents popularity function estimates for U.S. presidents which are based on a model in which voters' evaluations reflect an understanding of partisan reputations for differing policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alesina, A. (1987). Macroeconomic policy in a two-party system as repeated game.Quarterly Journal of Economics 102: 651–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amemiya, T. (1981). Qualitative response models: A survey.Journal of Economic Literature 19: 1483–1536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, N. (1982). Parties, administrations, and American macroeconomic outcomes.American Political Science Review 76: 82–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow, G.C. (1960). Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions.Econometrica 28: 591–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D. (1989). Conservatism.Economic Policy 11: 99–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1957).An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedlaender, A.F. (1973). Macro policy goals in the postwar period: A study in revealed preferences.Quarterly Journal of Economics 87: 25–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodhart, C.A.E. and Bhansali, R.J. (1971). Political economy.Political Studies 18: 43–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbs, D.A. (1977). Political parties and macroeconomic policy.American Political Science Review 71: 1467–1487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernell, S. (1978). Explaining presidential popularity.American Political Science Review 72: 506–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, G.H. (1964). Short-term fluctuations in U.S. voting behavior, 1896–1964.American Political Science Review 65: 131–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacRae, C.D. (1977). A political model of the business cycle.Journal of Political Economy 85: 239–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In P. Zarembka (Ed.),Frontiers in econometrics, 105–142. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meltzer, A.H. and Vellrath, M. (1975). The effects of economic policies on votes for the presidency: Some evidence from recent elections.Journal of Law and Economics 18: 781–798.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosley, P. (1984).The making of economic policy. Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swank, O.H. (1990a). Presidential popularity and reputation.De Economist 138: 168–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swank, O.H. (1990b).Policy makers, voters and optimal control. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Erasmus University Rotterdam, Room H10-15, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam

    O. H. Swank

  2. Tinbergen Institute, The Netherlands

    O. H. Swank

Authors
  1. O. H. Swank
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

I am indebted to J.C. Siebrand, F.A.A.M. van Winden and an anonymous referee for many useful suggestions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Swank, O.H. Popularity functions based on the partisan theory. Public Choice 75, 339–356 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01053443

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01053443

Keywords

Search

Navigation