Skip to main content
Log in

Sorption of labelled phosphate by a Vertisol and an Alfisol of the semi-arid zone of India

  • Published:
Fertilizer research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Information on phosphate sorption properties of Vertisols is scarce, but can help to explain the different responses of crops to fertilizer P on Vertisols, as compared with Alfisols.

Adsorption isotherms for total adsorbed phosphate and isotopically exchangeable phosphate were measured for typical examples of a Vertisol and an Alfisol, occurring in close proximity at the ICRISAT centre. For each soil, the relationships of exchangeable P and total adsorbed P with phosphate solution concentration were described well by the Freundlich isotherm. Neither of the soils adsorbed significant amounts of P in a non-exchangeable form. The Vertisol had a higher capacity and buffer power for phosphate sorption, implying a lower response to fertilizer P. However, all adsorbed P remained in forms labile to32P, equilibrated for 22 h, so that for equal amounts of CaCl2 extractable P there was more labile P in the Vertisol. In the absence of added P, the data suggested that the Vertisol maintained a greater level of dissolved and labile P. These observations are in accord with the results of field experiments, where larger applications of P may be required in Vertisols, compared with Alfisols, to achieve the same yield response, but that P is more freely available to crops grown in Vertisols than is suggested by chemical extraction methods for available P.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allison LE and Moodie CD (1965) Carbonate. In: CA Black et al. (eds.) Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. Agronomy 9: 1379–1400. Am Soc Agron, Madison, Wisconsin, USA

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barrow NJ (1983) On the reversibility of phosphate adsorption by soils. J Soil Sci 34: 751–758

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bremner JM and Mulvaney CS (1982) Total Nitrogen. In: AL Page et al. (eds.) Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. Agronomy 9: 595–624. Am Soc Agron, Madison, Wisconsin, USA

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chapman HD (1965) Cation Exchange Capacity. In: CA Black et al. (eds.) Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. Agronomy 9: 891–901. Am Soc Agron, Madison, Wisconsin, USA

    Google Scholar 

  5. Day PR (1965) Hydrometer method of particle size analysis. In: CA Black et al. (eds.) Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. Agronomy 9: 562–566. Am Soc Agron, Madison, Wisconsin, USA

    Google Scholar 

  6. El-Swaify SA, Pathak P, Rego TJ and Singh S (1985) Soil management for optimized productivity under rainfed conditions in the semi-arid tropics. Adv Soil Sci 1: 1–64

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fox RL and Kamprath EJ (1970) Phosphate sorption isotherms for evaluating the phosphate requirements of soils. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 34: 902–907

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gregory PJ (1988) Growth and functioning of plant roots. In: A Wild (ed.) Russell's Soil Conditions and Plant Growth. 11th edition: 155–163. Longman, Harlow, England

    Google Scholar 

  9. Goedert WJ (1983) Management of the Cerrado soils of Brazil: a review. J Soil Sci 34: 405–428

    Google Scholar 

  10. Holford ICR (1979) Evaluation of soil phosphate buffering indices. Aust J Soil Res 17: 495–504

    Google Scholar 

  11. ICRISAT (1985) International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics. Annual Report for 1984: 256–258. Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh 502 324, India

    Google Scholar 

  12. Juo ASR and Fox RL (1977) Phosphate sorption characteristics of some bench-mark soils of West Africa. Soil Sci 104: 370–376

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kamprath EJ and Watson ME (1980) Conventional soil and tissue tests for assessing the phosphorus status of soils. In: F Khasawneh (ed.) The Role of Phosphorus in Agriculture: 433–469. Am Soc Agron, Madison, Wisconsin, USA

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kanwar JS (1986) Crop production techniques and fertilizer management with special reference to phosphate fertilizer in rainfed areas: ICRISAT experience. In: Crop Production Techniques and Fertilizer Management in Rainfed Agriculture in Southern Asia. Proceedings of the second regional IMPHOS seminar, 22–25 January 1986. Institute Mondial du Phosphate (IMPHOS) and Fertilizer Association of India, New Delhi, India

    Google Scholar 

  15. Le Mare PH (1982) Sorption of isotopically exchangeable and non-exchangeable phosphate by some soils of Colombia and Brazil, and comparisons with soils of Southern Nigeria. J Soil Sci 33: 691–707

    Google Scholar 

  16. Le Mare PH, Pereira J and Goedert WJ (1987) Effects of green manure on isotopically exchangeable phosphate in a dark red latosol in Brazil. J Soil Sci 38: 199–209

    Google Scholar 

  17. Murphy J and Riley JP (1962) A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal Chim Acta 27: 31–36

    Google Scholar 

  18. Murthy ASP (1988) Distribution, properties and management of vertisols of India. Adv Soil Sci 8: 151–214

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nychas AE and Kosmas CS (1984) Phosphate adsorption by dark alkaline vertisols in Greece. Geoderma 32: 319–327

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nye PH (1968) The use of exchange isotherms to determine diffusion coefficients in soil. Trans 9th Int Cong Soil Sci 1: 117–125

    Google Scholar 

  21. Olsen SR and Sommers LE (1982) Phosphorus. In: AL Page et al. (eds.) Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. Agronomy 9: 403–430. Am Soc Agron, Madison, Wisconsin, USA

    Google Scholar 

  22. Probert ME, Fergus IF, Bridge BJ, McGarry D, Thompson CH and Russell JS (1987) The Properties and Management of Vertisols. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon., UK

    Google Scholar 

  23. Walkley A and Black IA (1934) An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37: 29–38

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sahrawat, K.L., Warren, G.P. Sorption of labelled phosphate by a Vertisol and an Alfisol of the semi-arid zone of India. Fertilizer Research 20, 17–25 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01055397

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01055397

Key words

Navigation