Skip to main content
Log in

The role of competence theories in cognitive psychology

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses several common misunderstandings regarding theories of competence. Such theories are characterized as being concerned with the epistemological side of cognitive psychology and as being based primarily on evidence of a special kind: intuitions of competent performers. The nature of such evidence is examined in relation to the question of objectivity. The position that competence may be described in terms of implicit rules is discussed from several perspectives. Finally a number of empiricist objections to the notion of competence are examined: particularly ones based on the fact that whereas competence theories are infinitary, deterministic, and formally complete, observations of actual performance suggest that it is best characterized as finitary, probabilistic, and heuristically organized. Finally the question of the psychological reality of competence formalisms is discussed and it is argued that the claim of the psychological reality of amechanism, as opposed to a structural description, is only appropriate when the mechanism accounts parsimoniously for the widest possible range of empirical phenomena.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Braine, M. D. S. (1965). On the basis of phrase structure.Psych. Rev. 72: 483–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, Lewis. (1956). What the tortise said to achilles. In Newman, J. (ed.),The World of Mathematics. Simon & Schuster, New York, pp. 2402–2405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1957).Syntactic Structures. Mouton, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1964).Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. Mouton, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1965).Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1969). Linguistics and philosophy. In Hook, S. (ed.),Language and Philosophy. New York University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. H. (1969). Linguistic processes in deductive reasoning.Psych. Rev. 76: 387–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crothers, E., and Suppes, P. (1967).Experiments in Second-Language Learning. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Groot, A. D. (1965).Thought and Choice in Chess. Mouton, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Saussure, F. (1959).Course in General Linguistics. The Philosophical Library, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H. L. (1972).What Computers Can't Do: A Critique of Artificial Reason. Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, J. (1969). Some decidability results on grammatical inference and complexity. Stanford Artificial Intelligence Project memo A1-93, Stanford University, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A. (1968).Psychylogical Explanation. Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, M. (1967). Language identification in the limit.Information and Control 10: 447–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halle, M. (1961). On the role of simplicity in linguistic descriptions. In Jacobson, R. (ed.),Structure of Language and Its Mathematical Aspects. Proceedings of the 12th Symposium in Applied Mathematics. Providence, R.I.

  • Heyting, A. (1966).Intuitionism: An Introduction (2nd. ed.). North Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hockett, C. F. (1968).The State of the Art. Mouton, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hook, S. (ed.) (1969).Language and Philosophy. New York University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. J. (1964). Semi-sentences. In Fodor, J. A., and Katz, J. J. (eds.),The Structure of Language. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köhler, W. (1929).Gestalt Psychology. Liveright, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koutsoudas, A. (1966).Writing Transformational Grammars. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luchins, A. S., and Luchins, E. H. (1965).Logical Foundations of Mathematics for Behavioral Scientists. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, J. (1968).Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J., and Hayes, P. (1969). Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence.Machine Intelligence 4. University of Edinburgh Press, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menyuk, P. (1969).Sentences Children Use, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A., and Chomsky, N. (1963). Finitary models of language users. In Luce, R. D., Bush, R. R., and Galanter, E. (eds.),Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. II. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., and Pribram, K. H. (1960).Plans and the Structure of Behavior. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myhill, J. (1952). Some philosophical implications of mathematical logic.Rev. Metaphysics 6: 165–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A., and Simon, H. A. (1972).Human Problem Solving. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, C. E. (1968). Toward a wedding of insufficiencies. In Dixon, T. R., and Horton, D. L. (eds.),Verbal Behavior and General Behavior. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polya, G. (1954).Mathematics and Plausible Reasoning Vols. I & II. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1972a). The problem of cognitive representation. (Research Bulletin No. 227), University of Western Ontario, Department of Psychology, London, Canada, 1972 (Mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1972b). Competence and psychological reality.Amer. Psych. 27: 546–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1972c). Minds, machines and phenomenology: Some reflections on Dreyfus' “What Computers Can't Do.” (Research Bulletin No. 235), University of Western Ontario, Department of Psychology, London, Canada, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. (1972). Sloppier and sloppier: a hierarchy of linguistically possible open sentences. Paper presented at a Workshop on Formal Semantics and Linguistics, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada, April, 1972 (to be published).

  • Simon, H. A., and Newell, A. (1964). Information-processing in computers and man.Amer. Sci. 52: 281–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salzinger, K. (1970). Pleasing linguists: A parable.J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 9: 725–727.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savin, H. B., and Perchonock, E. (1965). Grammatical structure and the immediate recall of English sentences.J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 4: 348–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, P. (1969). Stimulus-response theory of finite automata.J. Math. Psych. 6: 327–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, N. S. (1966). Discussion on paper by Fodor and Garrett. In Lyons, J. and Wales, R. J. (eds.),Psycholinguistic Papers. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhave, T. (1972). The language and mind of a polemicist: Some reflections on “Language and Mind.”J. Psych. Res. 1: 183–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wescott, M. R. (1968).Toward a Contemporary Psychology of Intuition. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, T. (1972). Understanding natural language.Cognitive Psych. 3: 1–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodworth, R. S., and Schlosberg, H. (1938).Experimental Psychology. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Work supported by the Foundations' Fund for Research in Psychiatry Postdoctoral Fellowship.

An early draft of this report was prepared while the author was on leave at the Institute for Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences, Stanford University.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pylyshyn, Z.W. The role of competence theories in cognitive psychology. J Psycholinguist Res 2, 21–50 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067110

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067110

Keywords

Navigation