Skip to main content
Log in

Further evidence on performance evaluation: Portfolio holdings, recommendations, and turnover costs

  • Published:
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper analyzes the performance of mutual funds in Spain between January 1980 and June 1990. The robustness of results to alternative measurements and benchmarks are analyzed. The results indicate that, with monthly returns alone, it is not possible to distinguish between selectivity and timing. We are only able to measure the magnitude of total performance. To be more precise about the reasons behind performance, portfolio holdings are necessary. This work employs a new data set based on monthly portfolio holdings of a representative sample of funds. A comparison of results using monthly returns and monthly portfolio holdings is made. In particular, thanks to the availability of portfolio holdings, we are able to separate selectivity and timing. Finally, the impact of turnover costs is considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Clifford S. Asness, Andrea Frazzini & Lasse Heje Pedersen

References

  • Admati, A., S. Bhattacharya, P. Pfleiderer, and S. Ross, “On Timing and Selectivcity.”Journal of Finance 41, 715–730 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Admati, A. and S. Ross, “Measuring Investment Performance in a Rational Expectations Equilibrium Model.”Journal of Business 58, 1–26 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Alonso, A., G. Rubio, and F. Tusell, “Asset Pricing and Risk Aversion in the Spanish Stock Market.”Journal of Banking and Finance 41, 351–369 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, S., and P. Pfleiderer, “A Note on Performance Evaluation.” Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, G. and R. Korajczyk, “Performance Measurement with the Arbitrage Pricing Theory: A New Framework for Analysis.”Journal of Financial Economics 15, 373–394 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, G. and R. Korajczyk, “The Attributes, Behavior and Performance of U.S. Mutual Funds.”Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 1, 1–22 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell, B., “Asymmetric Information and Portfolio Performance Measurement.”Journal of Financial Economics 7, 381–391 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumby, R. and J. Glen, “Evaluating the Performance of International Mutual Funds.”Journal of Finance 45, 497–521 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dybvig, P. and S. Ross, “The Analytics of Performance Measurement Using a Security Market Line.”Journal of Finance 40, 401–416 (1985a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dybvig, P. and S. Ross, “Differential Information and Performance Measurement Using a Security Market Line.”Journal of Finance 40, 383–399 (1985b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Elton, E. and M. Gruber, “Differential Information and Timing Ability.”Journal of Banking and Finance 15, 117–131 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Elton, E., Gruber, M., Das, S., and M. Hlavka, “Efficiency with Costly Information: A Reinterpretation of Evidence from Managed Portfolios.” Working paper, New York University, New York (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E., “Components of Investment Performance,”Journal of Finance 27, 551–567 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, M., S. Ross, and J. Shanken, “A Test of the Efficiency of a Given Portfolio.”Econometrica 57, 1121–1152 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinblatt, M. and S. Titman, “The Evaluation of Mutual Fund Performance: An Analysis of Monthly Returns.” Working paper, University of California, Loss Angeles (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinblatt, M. and S. Titman, “Portfolio Performance Evaluation: Old Issues and New Insights.”Review of Financial Studies 2, 393–421 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinblatt, M. and S. Titman, “Performance Measurement without Benchmarks: An Examination of Mutual Fund Returns.”Journal of Business 66, 47–68 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinblatt, M. and S. Titman, “A Study of Monthly Mutual Fund Returns and Performance Evaluation Techniques.”Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 29, 419–444 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Henriksson, R. and R. Merton, “On Market Timing and Investment Performance: Statistical Procedures for Evaluating Forecasting Skills.”Journal of Business 54, 513–533 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ippolito, R., “Efficiency with Costly Information: A Study of Mutual Fund Performance.”The Quarterly Journal of Economics 104, 1–23 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagannathan, R. and R. Korajczyk, “Assessing the Market Timing Performance of Managed Portfolios.”Journal of Business 59, 217–235 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kon, S., “The Market-Timing Performance of Mutual Fund Managers,”Journal of Business 56, 323–247 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubio, G., “Asset Pricing and Equity Rights Issues in the Spanish Capital Market.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, CA (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubio, G., “Further International Evidence on Asset Pricing: The Case of the Spanish Capital Market.”Journal of Banking and Finance 12, 221–242 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubio, G., “The Stock Market in Spain: Performance, Structure, and the Behavior of Asset Prices.”Journal of Financial Markets and Portfolio Management 4, 332–354 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubio, G., “Further Evidence on Performance Evaluation: Portfolio Holdings, Recommendations, and Turnover Costs.” Finance Working paper No. 22, Walter A. Haas School of Business, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Treynor, J. and F. Mazuy, “Can Mutual Funds Outguess the Market?”Harvard Business Review 44, 347–368 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H., “A Heteroscedasticity-Consistent Covariance Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroscedasticity.”Econometrica 48, 817–839 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rubio, G. Further evidence on performance evaluation: Portfolio holdings, recommendations, and turnover costs. Rev Quant Finan Acc 5, 127–153 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01075172

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01075172

Key words

Navigation