Skip to main content
Log in

Options and efficiency: Some experimental evidence

  • Published:
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the information aggregation role of options when agents possess diverse information about possible asset returns. We construct two identical experimental markets: one with and one without options. We find that options speed the information aggregation process. Asset markets that have parallel option markets aggregate traders' diverse information faster than markets where options trading is not available. Implied ranges were calculated from asset and option prices and compared to the actual ranges. These comparisons suggest that options may provide a means for agents to coordinate beliefs about asset values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Back, K., “Asymmetric Information and Options.” Working paper, Olin School of Business, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, M., “Price Changes of Related Securities: The Case of Call Options and Stock.”Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 22, 1–15 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Box, G.E.P., W.G. Hunter, and J.S. Hunter,Statistics for Experimenters: An Introduction to Design, Data Analysis and Model Building. New York: Wiley (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiras, D.P. and S. Manaster, “The Information Content of Option Prices.”Journal of Financial Economics 6, 213–244 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, T. and D. Friedman, “The Effect of Sequential Information Arrival on Asset Prices: An Experimental Study.”Journal of Finance XLII, 763–798 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsythe, R., T.R. Palfrey, and C.R. Plott, “Asset Valuation in an Experimental Market.”Econometrica 50, 537–567 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsythe, R., T.R. Palfrey, and C.R. Plott, “Futures Markets and Informational Efficiency: A Laboratory Examination,”Journal of Finance 39, 955–981 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, D., G. Harrison, and J. Salmon, “The Informational Efficiency of Experimental Asset Markets.”Journal of Political Economy 92(3), 349–408 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, S.J., “An Analysis of the Implications for Stock and Futures Price Volatility of Program Trading and Dynamic Hedging Strategies.”Journal of Business 61(3), 275–298 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacklin, C.J., A.W. Kleidon, and P. Pfleiderer, “Underestimation of Portfolio Insurance and the Crash of October 1987.”Review of Financial Studies 5(1), 35–63 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, R. and L. Starks, “Earnings Announcements, Stock Price Adjustment, and the Existence of Option Markets.”Journal of Finance XLI, 107–125 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Manaster, S. and R. Rendleman, “Option Prices as Predictors of Equilibrium Stock Prices.”Journal of Finance 37, 1043–1257 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien, J. and S. Srivastava, “Arbitrage and Informational Efficiency: Theory and Experimental Evidence.” Working paper, GSIA—Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Plott, C. and S. Sunder, “Efficiency of Experimental Sescurity Markets with Insider Information: An Application of Rational-Expectation Models.”Journal of Political Economy 90(4), 663–698 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Plott, C. and S. Sunder, “Rational Expectations and the Aggregation of Diverse Information in Laboratory Security Markets.”Econometrica 56, 1085–1118 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S., “Options and Efficiency.”Quarterly Journal of Economics 53, 336–359 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V., “Microeconomics Systems as an Experimental Science.”American Economic Review 72, 923–955 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunder, S., “Experimental Asset Markets: A Survey.” Working paper, GSIA—Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA (1992).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kluger, B.D., Wyatt, S.B. Options and efficiency: Some experimental evidence. Rev Quant Finan Acc 5, 179–201 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01075175

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01075175

Key words

Navigation