Abstract
InMaking the Mummies Dance, Thomas Hoving, former director of the Metropolitan Museum of Art, articulates a blistering defense of his, admittedly minority, view; namely, that trading directly with dealers when selling deaccessioned works of art or adding to museum collections is preferable to buying and selling in the open auction market (Hoving, 1992). Hoving has been severely criticized for his trades during his tenure at the Metropolitan, as well as for his assessment of the market for fine arts, which runs counter to the prevailing views held by many American public officials, professional art critics and museum boards. We shall present a theoretical model in support of Hoving's argument that trades made at auctions may not serve the public interest. We shall also statistically investigate the stochastic processes which characterize the tertiary art market.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akaike, H. (1974) “Markovian Representation of Stochastic Processes and Its' Application to the Analysis of Autoregressive Moving Average Processes”.Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 26: 363–387.
Box, George E.P., Jenkins, Gwilyn M., and Reinsel, Gregory, C. (1994)Time Series Analysis Forecasting and Control. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
Border, K.M.C. (1991) “Implementation of Reduced Form Auctions: A Geometric Approach”.Econometrica 59(4): 1,175–1,187.
Eckel, Catherine C. and Smith, William T. (1992) “Price Discrimination with Correlated Demands”.Southern Economic Journal 59(1): 58–65.
Hoving, Thomas (1993)Making the Mummies Dance. Simon & Schuster, New York, pp. 301–306.
Leland, E. Hayne (1972) “Theory of the Firm Facing Uncertain Demand”.American Economic Review 66: 278–91.
Lim, Chin (1980) “The Ranking of Behavioral Modes of the Firm Facing Uncertain Demand”.American Economic Review 70: 217–224.
Matthews, S.A. (1984) “On the Implementability of Reduced Form Auctions”.Econometrica 52: 1,519–1,522.
Melikian, Souren (1992) “The Art Addicts Take Over”.Art & Auction 15(4): 58–69.
Moulin, Raimonde E. (1992)L'Artiste L'Institution et le Marché, Flammarion, Paris.
Nuding, Gertrude Prescal (1990) “Ups and Downs; Estimates and Reserves Have Been on a Roller Coaster Lately, Raising Provocative Questions”.Art and Auction 12: 217–219.
Phillips, P.C.B., and Ouliaris, S. (1990) “Asympototic Properties of Residual Based Tests for Cointegration”.Econometrica 58: 165–193.
Singer, Leslie (1981) “Supply Decisions of Professional Artist”.American Economic Review 71: 341–346.
Singer, Leslie and Lynch, Gary (1989) “The Wealth Effect in Consumption of Art”, in D.V. Shaw, W.S. Hendon and V.L. Owen (eds.),Cultural Economics, An American Perspective, The Association for Cultural Economics, pp. 61–9.
Singer, Leslie (1990) “The Utility of Art vs. Fair Bets in the Investment Market”.Journal of Cultural Economics 14: 1–15.
Wang, Ruqu. (1993) “Auctions Versus Posted-Price Selling”.American Economic Review 83: 838–851.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Singer, L., Lynch, G. Public choice in the tertiary art market. J Cult Econ 18, 199–216 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01080226
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01080226