Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Inference to the loveliest explanation

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Achinstein, P.: 1992, ‘Inference to the Best Explanation: Or, Who Won the Mill-Whewell Debate?’,Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science,23, 349–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, E.: 1992a, ‘Explanatory Unification and Scientific Understanding’,PSA 1992 1, 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, E.: 1992b, ‘Explanatory Unification and the Problem of Asymmetry’,Philosophy of Science 59, 558–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, E.: 1994a, ‘Why P Rather Than Q? The Curiosities of Fact and Foil’,Philosophical Studies 73, 35–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, E.: 1994b, ‘Explaining Brute Facts’,PSA 1994 1, 61–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Menahem, Y.: 1990, ‘The Inference to the Best Explanation’,Erkenntnis 33, 319–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, B.: 1970, ‘Confirmation and Explanation’, in B. Brody (ed.),Readings in the Philosophy of Science, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, pp. 410–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, N.: 1983,How the Laws of Physics Lie, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costantini, D.: 1987, ‘Abductive Inferences’,Erkenntnis 26, 409–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, T. and Kincaid, H.: 1994, ‘Putting Inference to the Best Explanation in its Place’,Synthese 98, 271–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M.: 1974, ‘Explanation and Scientific Understanding’,The Journal of Philosophy 71, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, A.: 1981,Forms of Explanation, Yale University Press, New Haven & London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gjertsen, D.: 1989,Science and Philosophy: Past and Present, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanen, M. and Kelley, J.: 1990, ‘Inference to the Best Explanation in Archaeology’, in V. Pinksy (ed.),Critical Traditions in Contemporary Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 14–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, N. R.: 1972,Patterns of Discovery, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, G.: 1965, ‘The Inference to the Best Explanation’,The Philosophical Review 74, 88–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C.: 1966,The Philosophy of Natural Science, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, J.: 1993, Review of P. Lipton'sInference to the Best Explanation, Philosophy of Science 60, 679–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howson, C. and Urbach, P.:Scientific Reasoning: The Bayesian Approach, Open Court, La Salle, Illinois.

  • Kapitan, T.: 1990, ‘In What Way is Abductive Inference Creative?’,Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 26, 499–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P.: 1976, ‘Explanation, Conjunction, and Unification’,Journal of Philosophy 73, 207–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P.: 1981, ‘Explanatory Unification’,Philosophy of Science 48, 507–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P.: 1989, ‘Explanatory Unification and the Causal Structure of the World’, in P. Kitcher and W. Salmon (eds.),Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 13,Scientific Explanation, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 410–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleiman, L.: 1989, ‘Morality as the Best Explanation’,American Philosophical Quarterly 26, 161–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, P.: 1987, ‘A Real Contrast’,Analysis 47, 207–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, P.: 1990, ‘Contrastive Explanation’, in D. Knowles (ed.),Explanation and its Limits, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, P.: 1991,Inference to the Best Explanation, Routledge, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marinov, M.: 1988, ‘Inference to the Best Explanation: Van Fraassen and the Case of the ‘Fifth Force’’,International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 3, 35–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J.S.: 1904,A System of Logic, 8th ed., Longmans Green, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S.: 1931, in C. Hartshorn and P. Weiss (eds.),Collected Papers, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, W.: 1989,Four Decades of Scientific Explanation, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, W.: 1990, ‘Scientific Explanation: Causation and Unification’,Critica 22, 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thagard, P.: 1978, ‘The Best Explanation: Criteria for Theory Choice’,The Journal of Philosophy 75, 76–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Fraassen, B.: 1980,The Scientific Image, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, J.: 1990, ‘Cartesian Skepticism and Inference to the Best Explanation’,Journal of Philosophy 87, 658–666.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, Southern Methodist University, 75275-0142, Dallas, TX, USA

    Eric Barnes

Authors
  1. Eric Barnes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

I am grateful to Jesse Hobbs, Peter Lipton, and two anonymousSynthese referees for many helpful comments and criticisms. All page references are to Lipton (1991) unless otherwise noted.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barnes, E. Inference to the loveliest explanation. Synthese 103, 251–277 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01090049

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01090049

Search

Navigation