Skip to main content
Log in

The interpretation of nonverbal behavior in a role-defined interaction sequence: The police-citizen encounter

  • Published:
Environmental psychology and nonverbal behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Videotapes of staged police-citizen interactions were shown to subjects. Nonverbal behaviors of the citizen were programmed to reflect empirically derived reactions to spatial intrusion versus nonintrusion conditions by the police officer. In the first study subjects made attributional ratings of the citizen based on the nonverbal behaviors only with the physical distance between the interactants held constant. Citizens exhibiting spatial intrusion reaction behaviors were judged to be significantly more deceptive, guilty, anxious, and generally more suspicious and unfavorable than citizens not exhibiting such behaviors. In the second study physical distance was explicitly manipulated to create a close versus distant condition. The behavioral cue manipulation from the first study was reproduced in each of these proximity conditions. Many replications of results from the first study were obtained indicating that the preponderant cause of impression formation of the citizen was based upon spatial intrusion behavioral cues, regardless of the perceived physical distance between the interactants. However, significant interaction effects between proximity and behavioral cue conditions were obtained and confirmed an attribution theory prediction regarding degree of confidence in impression-formation ratings made of the citizen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Argyle, M., & Dean, J. Eye-contact, distance and affiliation.Sociometry 1965,28 289–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, J. C., & Deanovich, B. F. The anxiety-arousing effects of inappropriate crowding.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1968,35 174–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, J. C., & Rozelle, R. M. Nonverbal expression as a function of crowding during a simulated police-citizen encounter.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1975,32 40–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calder, B. J. Information cues and attributions based on role behavior.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1974,10 121–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collett, P. Training Englishmen in the nonverbal behavior of Arabs: An experiment on inter-cultural communication.International Journal of Psychology 1971,6 209–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, F. Analytic posturology.Psychoanalytic Quarterly 1952,21 196–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. Nonverbal behavior in psychotherapy research. In J. Shlien (Ed.),Research in psychotherapy, Vol. III. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1968, pp. 179–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. Detecting deception from the body and face.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1974,29 288–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felipe, N. J., & Sommer, R. Invasions of personal space.Social Problems 1966,14 206–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, G. N., Kiesler, C. A., & Collins, B. E. Visual behavior and face-to-face distance during interaction.Sociometry 1969,32 43–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E. T.The hidden dimension. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutt, C., & Vaizey, M. Differential effects of group density on social behavior.Nature 1966,209 1371–1372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E.Ingratiation. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E., & Nisbett, R. E. The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. In E. E. Jones, et al. (Eds.),Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior. Morristown, N.J.: General Learning Press, 1972, pp. 151–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. H. Attribution in social interaction. In E. E. Jones et al. (Eds.),Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior. Morristown, N.J.: General Learning Press, 1972, pp. 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahl, G. Gestures and body movements in interviews. In J. Shlien (Ed.),Research in psychotherapy, Vol. III. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1968, pp. 299–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClintock, C., & Hunt, R. Nonverbal indicators of affect and deception in an interview setting.Public Opinion Quarterly, in press.

  • Mehrabian, A.Silent messages. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, H. M. Approval-seeking and approval-inducing functions of verbal and nonverbal responses in a dyad.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1966,4 597–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozelle, R. M., & Baxter, J. C. Impression formation and danger recognition in experienced police officers.Journal of Social Psychology 1975,96 53–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheflen, A. E.Body language and the social order. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokols, D., Rall, M., Pinner, B., & Schopler, J. Physical, social, and personal determinants of the perception of crowding.Environment and Behavior 1973,5 87–115.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rozelle, R.M., Baxter, J.C. The interpretation of nonverbal behavior in a role-defined interaction sequence: The police-citizen encounter. J Nonverbal Behav 2, 167–180 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01145819

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01145819

Keywords

Navigation