Abstract
A prototype limited-water-supply (LWS) sprinkler has been developed for manufactured (mobile) homes in a research program sponsored by the United States Fire Administration. The LWS sprinkler is designed to be installed at a 2.44 m (8-foot) spacing and to have a total water supply of 380ℓ (100 gallons). The installation spacing was determined in a series of freeburn fire tests that indicated that the heat release rate at sprinkler actuation could be halved by reducing the sprinkler spacing from 3.66 m to 2.44 m (12 feet to 8 feet). A series of eight fullscale fire tests, including a corner living room scenario similar to that used in the Los Angeles Residential Test Program, was conducted to evaluate the performance of the prototype sprinkler. In five of the tests, room tenability was maintained during the 10-minute period following the actuation of a single sprinkler at a flow rate of 38 ℓpm (10 gpm). In three tests, tenability was maintained with multiple sprinkler actuation (2 or 3 sprinklers) and a total system flow rate of 49 ℓpm (13 gpm). The spray of the sprinkler was characterized in terms of its water flux distribution and drop size distribution. The thermal sensitivity requirements of the sprinkler are to be based upon RTI, C, and temperature rating, which would ensure that sprinkler actuation would occur at fire sizes comparable to those encountered using the prototype LWS sprinkler in this study.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
NFPA 13D,Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems in One- and Two-Family Dwellings and Mobile Homes, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 1980.
“Maryland Requires Sprinklers in Townhouses,”Fire News, August/September 1992.
Hall, J.R., “Fire Experience in Manufactured Homes,”NFPA Journal, May/June 1993, pp. 62–68.
Carey, W.M.,Final Report of Sprinkler Research, Report under Contract EMW-89-C-3083 for Federal Emergency Management Agency, Project 89NK24249/NC188, Underwriters Laboratories, Inc., Northbrook, IL, December 1990.
Vincent, B.G., Kung, H-C., Hill, E. E., Jr., “Residential Fire Sprinkler Demonstration Tests,”Technical Report J.I. 0T1R4, RA, Factory Mutual Research Corporation, Norwood, MA, July 1990.
Bill, R.G., Jr., Kung, H-C., Hill, E. E., Jr., Chan, T-S., and Brown, W R., “The Development of a Limited-Water-Supply Sprinkler for Mobile Homes,”Technical Report J.I. 0T1N7, RA, Factory Mutual Research Corporation, Norwood, MA, April 1992.
Kung, H-C., Spaulding, R.D., Hill, E.E., Jr., and Symonds, A.P., “Field Evaluation of Residential Prototype Sprinkler-Los Angeles Fire Test Program,”Technical Report J.I. 0E0R3,RA(1), Factory Mutual Research Corporation, Norwood, MA, February 1982.
ISO 6182-1, “Fire Protection — Automatic Sprinkler Systems—Part 1: Requirements and Methods of Test for Sprinklers,” International Standards Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1992.
Bill, R.G., Jr., “Thermal Sensitivity Limits of Residential Sprinklers,”Fire Safety Journal, 21, 131 - 152, 1993.
Heskestad, G. and Bill, R.G., Jr., “Conduction Heat-Loss Effects on Thermal Response of Automatic Sprinklers,”Technical Report J.I. ONOJ5.RU/ON1J6.RU, Factory Mutual Research Corporation, Norwood, MA, September 1987.
Heskestad, G. and Bill, R.G., Jr., “Quantification of Thermal Responsiveness of Automatic Sprinklers,”Fire Safety Journal, 14, 113–125, 1988.
Heskestad, G. and Bill, R.G., Jr., “Modeling of Thermal Responsiveness of Automatic Sprinklers,” Second International Symposium on Fire Safety Science, Hemisphere Press, New York, 1989, pp. 603–612.
Bill, R.G., Jr., Brown, W.R., Hill, E.E., Jr., Kung, H-C., Spaulding, R., Stavrianidis, P., Vincent, B.G., and Yu, H.-Z., “Predicting the Suppression Capability of Residential Quick Response Sprinklers in a Light Hazard Scenario,”Technical Report J.I. OQ5NO-8.RA, Factory Mutual Research Corporation, Norwood, MA, 1990.
Heskestad, G., “Sprinkler Performance as Related to Size and Design, Volume I, Laboratory Investigation,”Technical Report No. 22437, Factory Mutual Research Corporation, Norwood, MA, February 1979.
Bill, R.G., Jr., Kung, H-C., Vincent, B.G., Brown, W.R., and Hill, E.E., Jr., “Predicting the Suppression Capability of Quick Response Sprinklers in a Light Hazard Scenario, Part 2: Actual Delivered Density (ADD) Measurements and Full-Scale Fire Tests,”Journal of Fire Protection Engineering, 3, (3), 1991, pp. 95–107.
Budnick, E.K. and Fleming, R.P., “How Quick Response Sprinklers Perform,”Fire Journal, September/October 1989, pp. 47–56.
Carey, W., “Report of the Quick Response Sprinkler Project, Group 2, Performance Tests, Phase I — RDD Tests,” Underwriters Laboratories, Inc., sponsored by NFPRF, Quincy, MA, March 1988.
Bill, R.G., Jr., Kung, H-C., Brown, W.R., Hill, E.E., Jr., and Spaulding, R.D., “Predicting the Suppression Capability of Quick Response Sprinklers in a Light Hazard Scenario, Part 1: Fire Growth and Required Delivered Density (RDD) Measurements,”Journal of Fire Protection Engineering, 3 (3), 1991, pp. 81–93.
Bill, R.G., Jr., Kung, H-C., Brown, W.R., and Hill, E.E., Jr., “Effects of Cathedral and Beamed Ceiling Construction on Residential Sprinkler Performance,”Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Fire Safety Science, Hemisphere Publishing Corp., New York, 1989, pp. 643–653.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bill, R.G., Kung, HC. Limited-water-supply sprinklers for manufactured (mobile) homes. Fire Technol 29, 203–225 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01152107
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01152107