Skip to main content
Log in

Tests of the generality of self-efficacy theory

  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present set of studies tested the explanatory and predictive generality of self-efficacy theory across additional treatment modalities and behavioral domains. Microanalysis of changes accompanying symbolic modeling indicates that this mode of treatment enhances coping behavior partly through its effects on perceived efficacy. Cognizing modeled mastery of threats increased phobics' self-percepts of efficacy, which, in turn, predicted their specific performance attainments on tasks of varying threat value. Examination of efficacy probes revealed that making efficacy judgments has no effect on subsequent avoidance behavior or on fear arousal. The close congruence found between changes in self-efficacy and different forms of coping behavior in the treatment of agoraphobia provides some evidence for the generality of efficacy theory across different areas of functioning. Microanalysis of anticipatory and performance fear arousal accompanying varying strengths of self-efficacy also lends support for the social learning conception of fear arousal in terms of perceived coping inefficacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference Notes

  1. Schunk, D. A.Self-efficacy in achievement behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, 1979.

  2. Miller, S. M., & Grant, R. P.Predictability and human stress: Evidence, theory, and conceptual clarification. Unpublished manuscript, University of Pennsylvania, 1979.

References

  1. Averill, J. Personal control over aversive stimuli and its relationship to stress.Psychological Bulletin 1973,80 286–303.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bandura, A. Social learning perspective on behavior change. In A. Burton (Ed.),What makes behavior change possible? New York: Brunner/Mazel, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bandura, A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.Psychological Review 1977,84 191–215.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bandura, A. Reflections on self-efficacy. In S. Rachman (Ed.),Advances in behaviour research and therapy (Vol. 1). Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bandura, A. Self-referent thought: The development of self-efficacy. In J. H. Flavell & L. D. Ross (Eds.),Cognition and social development: Frontiers and possible futures. New York: Cambridge Press, 1980, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bandura, A., & Adams, N. E. Analysis of self-efficacy theory of behavioral change.Cognitive Therapy and Research 1977,1 287–308.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bandura, A., Adams, N. E., & Byer, J. Cognitive processes mediating behavioral change.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1977,35 125–139.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bandura, A., & Barab, P. G. Processes governing disinhibitory effects through symbolic modeling.Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1973,82 1–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bandura, A., Blanchard, E. B., & Ritter, B. Relative efficacy of desensitization and modeling approaches for inducing behavioral, affective, and attitudinal changes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1969,13 173–199.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Black, A. H. Cardiac conditioning in curarized dogs. The relationship between heart rate and skeletal behaviour. In W. P. Prokasy (Ed.),Classical conditioning: A symposium. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bolles, R. C. The avoidance learning problem. In G. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 6). New York: Academic Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brown, I., Jr., & Inouye, D. K. Learned helplessness through modeling: The role of perceived similarity in competence.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1978,36 900–908.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dweck, C. S., & Gilliard, D. Expectancy statements as determinants of reactions to failure: Sex differences in persistence and expectancy change.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1975,32 1077–1084.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Eysenck, H. J. Expectations as causal elements in behavioral change. In S. Rachman (Ed.),Advances in behaviour research and therapy (Vol. 1). Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hardy, A. B.Agoraphobia: Symptoms, causes, treatment. Menlo Park, California: Terrap, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Herrnstein, R. J. Method and theory in the study of avoidance.Psychological Review 1969,76 49–69.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kazdin, A. E. Covert modeling and the reduction of avoidance behavior.Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1973,81 87–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kazdin, A. E. Effects of covert modeling and reinforcement on assertive behavior.Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1974,83 240–252. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kazdin, A. E. Covert modeling, model similarity, and reduction of avoidance behavior.Behavior Therapy 1974,5 325–340. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kazdin, A. E. Covert modeling, imagery assessment, and assertive behavior.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1975,43 716–724.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kazdin, A. E. Effects of covert modeling, multiple models, and model reinforcement on assertive behavior.Behavior Therapy 1976,7 211–222.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Meichenbaum, D.Cognitive-behavior modification: An integrative approach. New York: Plenum Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Miller, S. M. Controllability and human stress: Method, evidence and theory.Behaviour Research and Therapy 1979,17 287–304.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rachman, S., & Hodgson, R. Synchrony and desynchrony in fear and avoidance.Behaviour Research and Therapy 1974,12 311–318.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rescorla, R. A., & Solomon, R. L. Two-process learning theory: Relationships between Pavlovian conditioning and instrumental learning.Psychological Review 1967,74 151–182.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schwartz, B.Psychology of learning and behavior. New York: Norton, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wolpe, J. Self-efficacy theory and psychotherapeutic change: A square peg for a round hole. In S. Rachman (Ed.),Advances in behaviour research and therapy (Vol. 1). Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zajonc, R. B., & Brickman, P. Expectancy and feedback as independent factors in task performance.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1969,11 148–156.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by Public Health Research Grant M-5162 from the National Institute of Mental Health. The authors are grateful to Seanna Adamson for administering the assessment procedures and to Evelyn Nast for her able assistance with the cognitive modeling treatment. We are deeply indebted to Sue Lampson for her valuable aid with the assessment phase of the agoraphobia study and to the staff of the Terrap treatment center for their generous help with this research.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bandura, A., Adams, N.E., Hardy, A.B. et al. Tests of the generality of self-efficacy theory. Cogn Ther Res 4, 39–66 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01173354

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01173354

Keywords

Navigation