Abstract
Using the College Classroom Environment Scales (CCES) and controlling for differences in class size, it was found that there were significant differences in students' perceptions of their classroom social climates depending on the type of collegiate institution they attended. Students at research universities perceived their classes as having more structure than did those at two year colleges and liberal arts colleges and they perceived less concern by instructors for their personal development and learning than did students at liberal arts colleges. Two-year college students perceived that their classes had higher academic standards than did their counterparts at liberal arts colleges. When comparing classes (and controlling for class size) in English composition, laboratory sciences, and behavioral sciences, it was found that students in English classes perceived them as being the most intellectually exciting and interesting, as being the most academically rigorous, as having the least amount of formal structure, and as promoting more friendships and cooperation among students (than in behavioral sciences classes). Laboratory sciences classes were perceived as having the most hostile and intimidating environments. Significant interactions of institutional type and academic discipline occurred on all scales of the CCES. It was found that perceptions of the classroom environment differentially affected students' course grades in each of the academic discipline areas.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Astin, A. W. (1965). Classroom environment in different fields of study.Journal of Educational Psychology, 56, 275–282.
Census, U.S. (1989).Statistical abstract of the United States: 1989. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
DeYoung, A. J. (1977). Classroom climate and class success: A study at the university level.Journal of Educational Research, 70, 252–257.
Dorhout, A. (1983). Student and teacher perceptions of preferred teacher behaviors among the academically gifted.Gifted Child Quarterly, 27, 122–123.
Fisher, D. L., & Fraser, B. J. (1983). A comparison of actual and preferred classroom environment as perceived by science teachers and students.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 55–61.
Fraser, B. J., & Fisher, D. L. (1982). Predicting students' outcomes from their perceptions of classroom psychosocial environments.American Educational Research Journal, 4, 498–518.
Fraser, B. J., & Treagust, D. F. (1987). Validity and use of an instrument for assessing classroom psychosocial environment in higher education.Higher Education, 15, 37–57.
Fraser, B. J., Treagust, D. F., & Dennis, N. C. (1986). Development of an instrument for assessing classroom psychosocial environment at universities and colleges.Studies in Higher Education, 11, 43–54.
Hadley, T., & Graham, J. W. (1987). The influence of cognitive development on perceptions of environmental press.Journal of College Student Personnel, 28, 388–394.
Kaye, S., Trickett, E., & Quinlan, D. (1976). Alternative methods for environmental assessment: An example.American Journal of Community Psychology, 4, 367–377.
Moos, R. H. (1976).The human context: Environmental determinates of behavior. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
Moos, R. H. (1979).Evaluating educational environments: Procedures, measures, findings and policy implications. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Perry, W. G., Jr. (1970).Forms of intellectual and ethical development: A scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Walberg, H. J., & Anderson, G. J. (1968). Classroom climate and individual learning.Journal of Educational Psychology, 59, 414–419.
Walberg, H. J., Steele, J. M., & House, E. R. (1974). Subject areas and cognitive press.Studies in Educational Evaluation, 6, 225–238.
Walberg, H. J. (Ed.). (1979).Educational environments and effects: Evaluation of policy and productivity. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
Winston, R. B., Jr., Vahala, M. E., Nichols, E. C., & Gillis, M. E. (1989). College Classroom Environment Scales (version 2). Unpublished instrument. Athens, GA: Department of Counseling and Human Development Service, The University of Georgia.
Winston, R. B., Jr., Vahala, M. E., Gillis, M. E., Nichols, E. C., Wintrow, M., & Rome, K. D. (1994). A measure of college classroom social climate: The College Classroom Environment Scales.Journal of College Student Development, 35, 11–18.
Additional information
Mary E. Vahala is currently Associate Director of Student Activities and Centers at the University of Wisconsin-LaCrosse and teaches in the college student personnel program. She obtained an Ed.D. in counseling and student personnel services from the University of Georgia. Her research interests focus on environmental assessment. Roger B. Winston, Jr. obtained his Ph.D. in counseling and student personnel services from the University of Georgia. He is professor and coordinator of the student affairs administration specialty in the Department of Counseling and Human Development Services at the University of Georgia. His research interests include environmental and outcomes assessment in higher education and the psychosocial development of college students.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vahala, M.E., Winston, R.B. College Classroom Environments: Disciplinary and institutional-type differences and effects on academic achievement in introductory courses. Innov High Educ 19, 99–122 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01191592
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01191592