References
K. J. Arrow: Social Choice and Individual Values, New York, 1963.
P. Bernholz: Logrolling, Arrow-Paradox and Cyclical Majorities, Public Choice15 (1973), pp. 87–95.
P. Bernholz: Logrolling, Arrow-Paradox and Decision Rules: A Generalization, Kyklos27 (1974 a), pp. 49–62.
P. Bernholz: Is a Paretian Liberal Really Impossible? Public Choice20 (1974 b), pp. 99–107.
P. Bernholz: Is a Paretian Liberal Really Impossible? A Rejoinder, Public Choice23 (1975), pp. 69–73.
P. Bernholz: Liberalism, Logrolling and Cyclical Group Preferences, Kyklos29 (1976), pp. 26–37.
P. Bernholz: Cyclical Group Preferences, Logrolling, Pareto-Optimality and the Paradox of Liberalism, Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Institut für Angewandte Wirtschaftsforschung, Diskussionspapier Nr. 29, Universität Basel, Dezember 1978.
F. Breyer: Das Liberale Paradox, Meisenheim a. Glan, 1978.
A. Gibbard: A Pareto-Consistent Libertarian Claim, Journal of Economic Theory7 (1974), pp. 388–410.
F. Harary, R. Z. Norman, and D. Cartwright: Structural Models: An Introduction to the Theory of Directed Graphs, New York, London and Sydney, 1965.
D. Luce and H. Raiffa: Games and Decisions, New York, London and Sydney, 1957.
N. R. Miller: Logrolling, Vote Trading and the Paradox of Voting: A Game-Theoretical Overview, Public Choice30 (1977), pp. 51–75.
N. R. Miller: A New “Solution Set” for Tournaments and Majority Voting, Paper held at the 1978 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, New York, August 31–September 3, 1978.
J. A. Oppenheimer: Relating Coalitions of Minorities to the Voters' Paradox or Putting the Fly in the Democratic Pie, Paper presented to Southwest Political Science Association Meeting, San Antonio, Texas, March–April 1972.
Th. Schwartz: Collective Choice, Separation of Issues and Vote Trading, American Political Science Review72 (1977).
A. K. Sen: The Impossibility of a Paretian Liberal, Journal of Political Economy78 (1970), pp. 152–157.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
I am grateful to valuable comments and critical remarks by F. Breyer, H. P. Bauer, H. J. Jaksch and M. Faber. An exchange of ideas with Thomas Schwartz extending over years has been helpful to develop the intuitive understanding of the problems discussed.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bernholz, P. A general social dilemma: Profitable exchange and intransitive group preferences. Zeitschr. f. Nationalökonomie 40, 1–23 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01282506
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01282506