Skip to main content
Log in

Game theory and power indices

  • Articles
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • R. J. Aumann and M. Maschler: The Bargaining Set for Cooperative Games, in: M. Dresher, L. S. Shapley, and A. W. Tucker (eds.): Advances in Game Theory, Princeton 1964.

  • S. J. Brams: Game Theory and Politics, New York 1975.

  • S. J. Brams and P. Affuso: Power and Size: A New Paradox, Theory and Decision7 (1976), pp. 29–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. J. Brams and M. Lake: Power and Satisfaction in a Representative Democracy, in: P. C. Ordeshook (ed.): Game Theory and Political Science. New York 1978.

  • P. Dubey and L. S. Shapley: Mathematical Properties of the Banzhaf Power Index, Mathematics of Operations Research4 (1979), pp. 99–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. C. Harsanyi: Rational Behavior and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and Social Situations. Cambridge 1977.

  • A. D. Horowitz: The Competitive Bargaining Set for Cooperativen-Person Games, Journal of Mathematical Psychology10 (1973), pp. 265–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Laakso: Valtaindeksien paradoksit (The Paradoxes of Power Indices), Research Reports of the Institute of Political Science. University of Helsinki, Ser. A N49, 1978.

  • R. McKelvey and R. Smith: Internal Stability and the Size Principle, Manuscript, Pittsburgh: Carnegie-Mellon University, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. W. Milnor and L. S. Shapley: Values of Large Games: Oceanic Games, Mathematics of Operations Research3 (1978), pp. 290–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. H. Nevison, B. Zicht, and S. Schoepke: A Naive Approach to the Banzhaf Index of Power, Behavioral Science23 (1978), pp. 130–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Nurmi: Power and Support, Munich Social Science Review, 1978/4, pp. 5–24.

  • W. H. Riker and P. C. Ordeshook: An Introduction to Positive Political Theory, Englewood Cliffs 1973.

  • W. H. Riker and L. S. Shapley: Weighted Voting, in: R. Pennock and J. Chapman (eds.): Representation: Nomos X, New York 1968.

  • A. Roth: The Shapley Value as a von Neumann-Morgenstern Utility, Econometrica45 (1977), pp. 657–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Schofield (1978 a): Generalised Bargaining Sets for Cooperative Games, International Journal of Game Theory7 (1978), pp. 183–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Schofield (1978 b): Proof of a Conjecture on the M2-Bargaining Set for a Class of Voting Games without Transferable Value, Manuscript 1978.

  • N. Z. Shapiro and L. S. Shapley: Values of Large Games I: A Limit Theorem, Mathematics of Operations Research3 (1978), pp. 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Shubik and R. J. Weber: Competitive Valuation of Cooperative Games, Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper 482, 1978.

  • P. D. Straffin: Power Indices in Politics, Modules in Applied Mathematics. Ithaca 1976.

  • P. D. Straffin: Homogeneity, Independence, and Power Indices, Public Choice30 (1977), pp. 107–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. D. Straffin: Probability Models for Power Indices, in: P. C. Ordeshook (ed.): Game Theory and Political Science. New York 1978.

  • R. J. Weber: Probabilistic Values for Games, Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper, No. 471R, September 1978.

  • H. P. Young (1977 a): Power, Prices, and Incomes in Voting Systems, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, RR-77-5, Laxenburg 1977.

  • H. P. Young (1977 b): Lobbying and Campaigning with Applications to the Measurement of Power, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, RR-77-13, Laxenburg 1977.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The author wishes to thank Norman Schofield for helpful discussions on the problematique of this paper as well as for his detailed criticism of an earlier version. Thanks are also due to the referee for a number of suggestions as well as for calling the author's attention to several recent studies on power indices. The first versions of this paper were written during the author's stay as a British Academy Wolfson Fellow at the University of Essex.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nurmi, H. Game theory and power indices. Zeitschr. f. Nationalökonomie 40, 35–58 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01282508

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01282508

Keywords

Navigation