Abstract
A recurrent theme in ethnomethodological research is that of “instructed actions”. Contrary to the classic traditions in the social and cognitive sciences, which attribute logical priority or causal primacy to instructions, rules, and structures of action, ethnomethodologists investigate the situated production of actions which enable such formulations to stand as adequate accounts. Consequently, a recitation of formal structures can not count as an adequate sociological description, when no account is given of the local production ofwhat those structures describe. The natural sciences can be described as a domain of practical action in whichthe use of methods enables the intersubjective reproduction of naturalistic observations and experiments. As numerous sociological studies of laboratory practices have shown, the achievement of intersubjective order cannot be reduced to formal methods; instead, it arises from the work of custom-fitting relevant methods to the local circumstances of the research. In this paper we discuss a possible extension of this idea to cover two intertwined aspects of molecular biology: (1) the work of following instructions on how to perform routine laboratory procedures, and (2) the relationship between cellular orders and the encoded ‘instructions’ contained in the DNA molecule. We suggest that a “classic” conception of scientific action is implied by the way formal instructions are treated as a primary basis, both for molecular biologists' actions and the cellular functions they study, and we envision an ethnomethodological alternative to those conceptions of social and biological order.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amann, K. and Knorr-Cetina, K. (1990). The fixation of (visual) evidence. In M. Lynch and S. Woolgar (Eds.),Representation in scientific practice. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Bloor, D. (1976).Knowledge and social imagery. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Callon, M. (1986a). The sociology of an actor-network: The case of the electric vehicle. In M. Callon and A. Rip (Eds.),Mapping the dynamics of science and technology: Sociology of science in the real world. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.
Callon, M. (1986b). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Eds.),Power. action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? 196–233. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Cambrosio, A. and Keating, P. (1988). ‘Going monoclonal’: Art, science, and magic in the day-to-day use of hybridoma technology.Social Problems 35: 244–260.
Cohen, S.N. (1988). DNA cloning: A personal perspective.Focus 10(1): 1–4.
Collins, H.M. (1985).Changing order replication and induction in scientific practice. London and Beverly Hills: Sage.
Collins, H. M. (1990).Artificial experts: social knowledge and intelligent machines. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Coulter, J. (1983).Rethinking cognitive theory. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Dreyfus, H. (1979).What computers can't do. New York: Harper and Row.
Fujimura, J. (1992). Crafting science: Standardized packages, boundary objects, and ‘translation’. In A. Pickering (Eds.),Science as practice and culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Garfinkel, H. (1967).Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Garfinkel, H. (1991). Respecification: Evidence for locally produced, naturally accountable phenomena of order, logic, reason, meaning, method, etc. in and as of the essential haecceity of immortal ordinary society (I) — an announcement of studies. In G. Button (Eds.),Ethnomethodology and the human sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Garfinkel, H. and Sacks, H. (1970). on formal structures of practical actions. In J. C. McKinney & E. A. Tiryakian (Eds.),Theoretical sociology: Perspectives and development. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Garfinkel, H., Lynch, M. and Livingston, E. (1981). The work of a discovering science construed with materials from the optically discovered pulsar.Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11: 131–58.
Garfinkel, H., Livingston, E., Lynch, M., Macbeth, D and Robillard, A.B. (1989). Respecifying the natural sciences as discovering sciences of practical action (I and II): Doing so ethnographically by administering a schedule of contingencies in discussions with laboratory scientists and by hanging around their laboratories. Unpublished Paper. Department of Sociology, UCLA.
Garfinkel, H. and Wieder, D. L. (1992). Two incommensurable, asymmetrically alternate technologies of social analysis. In G. Watson and R.M. Seiler (Eds.),Text in context: Contributions to ethnomethodology. London: Sage.
Gibson, J.J. (1986).The ecological approach to visual perception. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gilbert, W. (1991). The scientific origins of the human genome project. Paper presented at Boston Colloquium for the Philosophy of Science, Boston University, 16 April.
Gilbert, W. (1992). A vision of the grail. In D.J. Kevles and L. Hood (Eds.),The code of codes: Scientific and social issues in the human genome project. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Goffman, E. (1974).Frame analysis. New York: Harper and Row.
Hilgartner, S. (1993). The human genome project: or, the STS of STS's. Unpublished paper. Columbia University.
Jordan, K. and Lynch, M. (1992). The sociology of a genetic engineering technique: Ritual and rationality in the performance of the plasmid prep. In A. Clarke and Fujimura (Eds.),The right tools for the job: At work in twentieth-century life science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Jordan, K. and Lynch, M. (1993). The mainstreaming of a molecular biological tool: A case study of a new technique. In G. Button (Eds.),Technology in working order: studies in work. interaction and technology. London and New York: Routledge.
Keller, E. F. (1992a). Secrets of life secrets of death: essays on languages gender and science. New York and London: Routledge.
Keller, E. F. (1992b). Nature, nurture and the human genome project. In D. Kevles and L. Hood (Eds.),The code of codes: scientific and social issues in the human genome project. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Kuhn, T. (1977). Second thoughts about paradigms. In F. Suppe (Ed.),The structure of scientific theories. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Latour, B. (1987).Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (1988).The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lewontin, R.C. (1992). The dream of the human genome.The New York Review of Books (28 May) 31–40.
Livingston, E. (1986).The ethnomethodological foundations of mathematics. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Lynch, M. (1985).Art and artifact in laboratory science. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Lynch, M. (1991). Method: Measurement — ordinary and scientific measurement as ethnomethodological phenomena. In G. Button (Eds.),Ethnomethodology and the human sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lynch, M. (1993).Scientific practice and ordinary action: Ethnomethodology and social studies of science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lynch, M. and Bogen, D. (1994). Harvey Sacks's primitive natural science.Theory, Culture & Society 11: 65–104.
Lynch, M. and Macbeth, D. (forthcoming). Demonstrating physics lessons. To appear in J. Greeno (Ed.).Education for intellectual practices in mathematical learning, science learning, and learning environments.
Maniatis, T., Fritsch, E.F. and Sambrook, J. (1982/1989).Molecular cloning; A laboratory manual. Cold Springs Harbor, NY: Cold Springs Harbor Laboratory.
Marx, K. (1845/1972). Theses on Feuerbach. In R. C. Tucker (Eds.),The Marx-Engels reader. New York: W. W. Norton.
Miller, G., Galanter, E. and Pribram, K. (1960).Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
O'Connell, J. (1993). Metrology: The creation of universality by the circulation of particulars.Social Studies of Science 23: 129–173.
Popper, K. (1959).The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Harper and Row.
Popper, K. (1970). The sociology of knowledge. In J. Curtis and J. Petras (Eds.),The sociology of knowledge. New York: Praeger.
Rabinow, P. (1992a). Galton's regret: of types and individuals. In P. R. Billings (Eds.),DNA on trial: Genetic identification and criminal justice. Plainview, NY: Cold Springs Harbor Laboratory Press.
Rabinow, P. (1992b). Studies in the anthropology of reason.Anthropology Today 8(5): 7–10.
Sacks, H. (1963). Sociological description.Berkeley Journal of Sociology 8: 1–16.
Sacks, H. (1984). Notes on methodology. In J.M. Atkinson and J. C. Heritage (Eds.),Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Sacks, H. (1989). Introduction. In G. Jefferson (Ed.),Harvey Sacks — lectures 1964–65. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Sacks, H. (1992).Lectures on conversation. Volume 1. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Sapp, J. (1987).Beyond the gene: Cytoplasmic inheritance and the struggle for authority in genetics. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schaffer, S. (1992). Late Victorian metrology and its instrumentation: A manufactory of ohms. In R. Bud and S. Cozzens (Eds.),Invisible connections: Instruments, institutions and science. Bellingham, WA: Optical Engineering Press.
Senior, J. (1958). The vernacular of the laboratory.Philosophy of Science 25(2): 163–168.
Shapin, S. and Schaffer, S. (1985).Leviathan and the air pump. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sinsheimer, R. (1969). The prospect of designed genetic change.Engineering and Science 32: 8–13.
Suchman, L. (1987).Plans and situated actions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Suchman, L. (1990). Representing practice in cognitive science. In M. Lynch and S. Woolgar (Eds.),Representation in scientific practice. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Wieder, D. L. (1970). Telling the code. In R. Turner (Ed.),Ethnomethodology. Hammondsworth: Penguin.
Wieder, D. L. (1974).Language and social reality: The case of telling the convict code. The Hague: Mouton.
Wittgenstein, L. (1958).Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lynch, M., Jordan, K. Instructed actions in, of and as molecular biology. Hum Stud 18, 227–244 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323211
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323211