Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

This article focuses on the possible instrumental characteristics of extrarole behaviours. Specifically, the motivation to perform beyond role requirements for future rewards is discussed. It is first argued that the motivation to engage in extrarole behaviors may stem from a reaction to inequity, or from a desire to receive rewards that cannot be achieved through the performance of official role requirements. Then, using data from two recent studies as support, it is proposed that these extrarole behaviors will only occur if the organizational reward system operates in a just, procedurally fair manner. Finally, the conceptual issues of how procedural justice might contribute to intrapreneurship and entrepreneurship are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 2), 267–299. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano, R., & Folger, R. (1989). Referent cognitions and task decision autonomy: Beyond equity theory.Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 293–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R. (1987a). Distributive and procedural justice in the workplace.Social Justice Research, 1, 143–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R. (1987b). Reformulating the preconditions of resentment: A referent cognitions model. In Masters, J. C., & Smith, W. P. (Eds.),Social Comparison. Justice. and Relative Deprivation: Theoretical, Empirical, and Policy Perspectives, 183–215. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R., Rosenfield, D., & Robinson, T. (1983). Relative deprivation and procedural justifications.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 268–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R., & Martin, C. (1986). Relative deprivation and referent cognitions: Distributive and procedural justice effects.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 531–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, M. A., & Kahn, R. L. (1978).The Social Psychology of Organizations (2nd Ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konovsky, M. A., & Folger, R. (1991).The effects of procedural and distributive justice on organizational citizenship behavior. Unpublished manuscript, Tulane University, A. B. Freeman Business School, New Orleans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mark, M. M., & Folger, R. (1984). Responses to relative deprivation: A conceptual framework.Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 192–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marris, P. (1975).Loss and Change. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organ, D. W. (1988).Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971).A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, A. D. (1983).The Entrepreneurial Life. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents.Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 653–663.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Folger, R. Justice, motivation, and performance beyond role requirements. Employ Respons Rights J 6, 239–248 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01419447

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01419447

Key Words

Navigation