Abstract
This article focuses on the possible instrumental characteristics of extrarole behaviours. Specifically, the motivation to perform beyond role requirements for future rewards is discussed. It is first argued that the motivation to engage in extrarole behaviors may stem from a reaction to inequity, or from a desire to receive rewards that cannot be achieved through the performance of official role requirements. Then, using data from two recent studies as support, it is proposed that these extrarole behaviors will only occur if the organizational reward system operates in a just, procedurally fair manner. Finally, the conceptual issues of how procedural justice might contribute to intrapreneurship and entrepreneurship are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 2), 267–299. New York: Academic Press.
Cropanzano, R., & Folger, R. (1989). Referent cognitions and task decision autonomy: Beyond equity theory.Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 293–299.
Folger, R. (1987a). Distributive and procedural justice in the workplace.Social Justice Research, 1, 143–159.
Folger, R. (1987b). Reformulating the preconditions of resentment: A referent cognitions model. In Masters, J. C., & Smith, W. P. (Eds.),Social Comparison. Justice. and Relative Deprivation: Theoretical, Empirical, and Policy Perspectives, 183–215. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Folger, R., Rosenfield, D., & Robinson, T. (1983). Relative deprivation and procedural justifications.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 268–273.
Folger, R., & Martin, C. (1986). Relative deprivation and referent cognitions: Distributive and procedural justice effects.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 531–546.
Katz, M. A., & Kahn, R. L. (1978).The Social Psychology of Organizations (2nd Ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Konovsky, M. A., & Folger, R. (1991).The effects of procedural and distributive justice on organizational citizenship behavior. Unpublished manuscript, Tulane University, A. B. Freeman Business School, New Orleans.
Mark, M. M., & Folger, R. (1984). Responses to relative deprivation: A conceptual framework.Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 192–218.
Marris, P. (1975).Loss and Change. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press.
Organ, D. W. (1988).Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Rawls, J. (1971).A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Silver, A. D. (1983).The Entrepreneurial Life. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents.Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 653–663.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Folger, R. Justice, motivation, and performance beyond role requirements. Employ Respons Rights J 6, 239–248 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01419447
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01419447