Skip to main content
Log in

An expanded investigation into the relationship of corporate social responsibility and financial performance

  • Articles
  • Published:
Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While many studies have examined the relationship of the two constructs of financial performance and CSR, little consensus has emerged. This study investigates the relationship through a set of comprehensive and long-term financial measures, which include both accounting and market returns. Also, an established CSR database generated through a validated CSR research instrument is used in a new, more thorough manner. While the regression analyses reveal no relationship to exist between the constructs, a number of methodological factors are proposed to play a role in contributing to such findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, W. F., & Monsen, J. R. (1979). On the measurement of corporate social responsibility.Academy of Management Journal, 22(3), 501–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, G. J., & Buchholz, R. A. (1978). Corporate social responsibility and stock market performance.Academy of Management Journal, 21, 479–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arlow, P., & Gannon, M. J. (1982). Social responsiveness, corporate structure, and economic performance.Academy of Management Review, 7, 235–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aupperle, K. E. (1984). An empirical measure of corporate social orientation.Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 6, 27–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B., & Hatfield, J. D. (1985). An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability.Academy of Management Journal, 28(2), 446–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aupperle, K. E., Acar, W., & Booth, D. E. (1986). An empirical critique of In Search of Excellence: How excellent are the excellent companies?Journal of Management, 12(4), 499–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, E. H., & Haire, M. (1975). A strategic posture toward corporate social responsibility.California Management Review, 18(2), 49–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bragdon, J. H., & Marlin, J. T. (1972). Is pollution profitable?Risk Management, 19(4), 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three dimension conceptual model of corporate social performance.Academy of Management Review, 4, 497–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, P., & Wood, R. (1984). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance.Academy of Management Journal, 4, 497–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corson, J. J., & Steiner, G. A. (1974).Measuring business' social performance: The corporate social audit. New York: Committee for Economic Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, M. (1988). Corporate giving is flat, and future looks bleak.Wall Street Journal, October 17, B1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, W. N., & Worrell, D. L. (1988). The impact of announcements of corporate illegalities on shareholder returns.Academy of Management Journal, 31(1), 195–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eilbirt, H., & Parket, R. I. (1973). The practice of business: The current status of corporate social responsibility.Business Horizons, 16(4), 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinz, D. C. (1976). Financial correlates of a social measure.Akron Business and Economic Review, 7(1), 48–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, S. L. (1977). Corporate social performance: Past and present areas of commitment.Academy of Management Journal, 20, 433–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance.Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 854–872.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moskowitz, M. (1972). Choosing socially responsible stocks.Business and Society Review, (1), 71–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostlund, L. E. (1977). Attitudes of managers toward corporate social policy.California Management Review, 19(4), 35–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paluszek, J. L. (1976).Business and Society: 1976–2000, an AMA Report. New York: AMACOM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parket, R., & Eilbirt, H. (1975). Social responsibility: The underlying factors.Business Horizons, 18(4), 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W. J., & Blackburn, R. S. (1988). CSR: A Psychometric Examination of a Measurement Instrument,Proceedings, SMA, Atlanta, November 1988, pp. 293–295.

  • So far so good, (1972).Business and Society Review (2), 88.

  • Spencer, B. A., & Taylor, G. S. (1987). A within and between analysis of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance.Akron Business and Economic Review, 18(3), 7–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturdivant, F. D., & Ginter, J. L. (1977). Corporate social responsiveness.California Management Review, 19(3), 30–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullmann, A. A. (1985). Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationship among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance.Academy of Management Review, 10, 540–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vance, S. C. (1975). Are socially responsible corporations good investment risks?Management Review,64(8).

  • What Ever Happened to Ethics. (1987).Time, May 25, 14–29.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aupperle, K.E., Van Pham, D. An expanded investigation into the relationship of corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Employ Respons Rights J 2, 263–274 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01423356

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01423356

Key Words

Navigation