Skip to main content
Log in

On some results of Atkin and Lehner

  • Published:
Mathematische Annalen Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Atkin, A. O. L., Lehner, J.: Hecke operators on Λ0(m). Math. Ann.185, 134–160 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baily, W., Borel, A.: Compactification of arithmetic quotients of bounded symmetric domains. Ann. of Math.84, 442–528 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Casselman, W.: On abelian varieties with many endomorphisms and a conjecture of Shimura's, Inventiones math.12, 225–236 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jacquet, H., Langlands, R. P.: Automorphic forms on GL(2). Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer Lecture Notes, No.114, 1970.

  5. Langlands, R. P.: Problems in the theory of automorphic forms, 18–86. In: Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer Lecture Notes, No.170, 1970.

  6. Miyake, T.: On automorphic forms onGL 2 and Hecke operators. Ann. of Math.94, 174–189 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ogg, A.: Functional equations of modular forms. Math. Ann.183, 337–340 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ogg, A.: On a convolution ofL-series. Inventiones math.7, 297–312 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rankin, R.: Contributions to the theory of Ramanujan's function τ(n) and similar arithmetical functions. II. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc.35, 357–372 (1939).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Satake, I.: Theory of spherical functions on reductive algebraic groups overp-adic fields. Publications Mathematiques I.H.E.S. No. 18.

  11. Weil, A.: Dirichlet series and automorphic forms. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer Lecture Notes. No.189, 1971.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Since submitting this, I have come across a paper by M. E. Novodvorskii, “On certain invariant vectors of infinite dimensional representations of Chevalley groups”, Functional Analysis and Its Applications, Vol. 5 (1971), pp. 87–88 (in Russian), which contains my Theorem 1 below. The proof he indicates is much simpler than mine, but not exhibiting any relationship to the zeta function.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Casselman, W. On some results of Atkin and Lehner. Math. Ann. 201, 301–314 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01428197

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01428197

Navigation