Conclusions
It is apparent that there is no single index that can provide a comprehensive measure of abrasiveness of rock material, but the range of tests described in the paper can provide an assessment of the overall abrasiveness of rock in conjunction with other physical properties. However, it is necessary to devise specific tests to suit a particular mode of excavation taking all these factors into account. Some subjective judgement is also necessary. These investigations can prevent costly mistakes in equipment selection and possibly assist in identifying alternative excavation systems.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atkinson, T. and Cassapi, V.B. (1984) The prediction and reduction of abrasive wear in mine excavation machinery, inInternational Conference on Tribology in Mineral Extraction, War on Wear, Institute of Mechanical Engineering, Nottingham University, pp. 165–174.
Aufmuth, R.E. (1973)Site engineering indexing of rock, field testing and instrumentation of rock, ASTM STP 554 American Society for Testing Materials, pp. 81–99.
Carter, P.G. and Sneddon, M. (1977) Comparison of the Schmidt hammer, point load and unconfined compression tests in carboniferous strata.Proceedings of the Conference on Rock Engineering. University of Newcastle upon Tyne, pp. 197–210.
Deere, D.V. and Miller, R.P. (1965)Classification and index properties for intact rock. Report AFWL-TR-65-116, Air Force Special Weapons Centre, Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico, US.
International Society of Rock Mechanics (1978) Commission on standardisation of laboratory and field tests, suggested methods for determining hardness and abrasiveness of rock.International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 15, 89.
Kasturi, T.S. (1984) Tribology — its effectiveness to the operation and maintenance problems in the conveyor system of neyveli lignite mines, inTransactions of Tribology in Mineral Extraction, War on Wear, September, C344/84, pp. 43–50.
McFeat-Smith, I. (1977) Rock property testing for the assessment of tunnelling machine performance.Tunnels and Tunnelling 9, pp. 29–33.
Muftuoglu, Y.V. (1983)A study of factors affecting diggability in British surface coal mines, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Nottingham.
National Coal Board (1972) The cone indenter, Mining Research and Development Establishment (MRDE)Handbook No. 5, Stanhope Bretby, Burton on Trent.
Poole, R.W. and Farmer, I.W. (1980) Consistency and repeatability of Schmidt hammer rebound data during field testing.International Journal Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences,17, 167.
Powers, M.C. (1953) A new scale roundness for sedimentary particles.Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 23, 117.
Singh, R.N. (1983)Testing of rock samples from underwater trenching operations off Folkstone. For the Central Electricity Generating Board (unpublished report).
Singh, R.N., Hassani, F.P. and Elkington, P. (1983) The application of strength and deformation index testing to the stability assessment of coal measures excavations.24th US Symposium on Rock Mechanics, A & M University, College Station, Texas, June, pp. 599–609.
West, G. (1981) A review of rock abrasiveness testing for tunnelling.International Symposium on Weak Rocks, International Society of Rock Mechanics, Tokyo, Paper No. II-3-39, pp. 222–332.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Atkinson, T., Cassapi, V.B. & Singh, R.N. Assessment of abrasive wear resistance potential in rock excavation machinery. International Journal of Mining and Geological Engineering 4, 151–163 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01560672
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01560672