Skip to main content
Log in

A dual approach to solving nonlinear programming problems by unconstrained optimization

  • Published:
Mathematical Programming Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several recent algorithms for solving nonlinear programming problems with equality constraints have made use of an augmented “penalty” Lagrangian function, where terms involving squares of the constraint functions are added to the ordinary Lagrangian. In this paper, the corresponding penalty Lagrangian for problems with inequality constraints is described, and its relationship with the theory of duality is examined. In the convex case, the modified dual problem consists of maximizing a differentiable concave function (indirectly defined) subject to no constraints at all. It is shown that any maximizing sequence for the dual can be made to yield, in a general way, an asymptotically minimizing sequence for the primal which typically converges at least as rapidly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K.J. Arrow and R.M. Solow, “Gradient methods for constrained maxima, with weakened assumptions”, in:Studies in linear and nonlinear programming, Eds. K. Arrow, L. Hurwicz and H. Uzawa (Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford, Calif., 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  2. K.J. Arrow, F.J. Gould and S.M. Howe, “A general saddle point result for constrained optimization”, Institute of Statistics Mimeo Series No. 774, Dept. of Statistics, Univ. of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, N.C., (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A.V. Fiacco and G.P. McCormick,Nonlinear Programming: Sequential Unconstrained Minimization Techniques (Wiley, New York, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Fletcher, “A class of methods for nonlinear programming with termination and convergence properties”, in:Integer and nonlinear programming, Ed. J. Abadie (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1970) pp. 157–175.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Fletcher and Shirley A. Lill, “A class of methods for nonlinear programming, II: Computational experience”, in:Nonlinear programming, Eds. J.B. Rosen, O.L. Mangasarian and K. Ritter (Academic Press, New York, 1971) pp. 67–92.

    Google Scholar 

  6. E.G. Golshtein,The Theory of Duality in Mathematical Programming and its Applications, Nauka (1971) (in Russian).

  7. E.G. Golshtein,Theory of Convex Programming, AMS Translation Series (1972).

  8. P.C. Haarhoff and J.D. Buys, “A new method for the optimization of a nonlinear function subject to nonlinear constraints”,Computer Journal 13 (1970) 178–184.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M.R. Hestenes, “Multiplier and gradient methods”, in:Computing methods in optimization problems — 2, Eds. L.A. Zadeh, L.W. Neustadt, A.V. Balakrishnan (Academic Press, New York, 1969) pp. 143–164.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M.R. Hestenes, “Multiplier and gradient methods”,Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 4 (1969) 303–320.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J.L. Joly and P.-J. Laurent, “Stability and duality in convex minimization problems”,Revue Française d'Informatique et de Recherche Opérationelle R-2 (1971) 3–42.

    Google Scholar 

  12. P.J. Laurent,Approximation et Optimisation (Hermann, Paris, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Miele, E.E. Cragg, R.R. Iver and A.V. Levy, “Use of the augmented penalty function in mathematical programming problems, part I”,Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 8 (1971) 115–130.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Miele, E.E. Cragg and A.V. Levy, “Use of the augmented penalty function in mathematical programming problems”, part II,Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 8 (1971) 131–153.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Miele, P.E. Moseley and E.E. Cragg, “A modification of the method of multipliers for mathematical programming problems”, in:Techniques of optimization, Ed. A.V. Balakrishnan (Academic Press, New York, 1972) pp. 247–260.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Miele, P.E. Moseley, A.V. Levy and G.M. Coggins, “On the method of multipliers for mathematical programming problems”,Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 10 (1972) 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M.J.D. Powell, “A method for nonlinear constraints in minimization problems”, in:Optimization, Ed. R. Fletcher (Academic Press, New York, 1969) pp. 283–298.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R.T. Rockafellar, “Convex functions and duality in optimization problems and dynamics”, in:Mathematical systems theory and economics, I, Eds. H.W. Kuhn and G.P. Szegö (Springer, Berlin, 1969) pp. 117–141.

    Google Scholar 

  19. R.T. Rockafellar,Convex Analysis (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, N.J., 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  20. R.T. Rockafellar, “Ordinary convex programs without a duality gap”,Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 7 (1971) 143–148.

    Google Scholar 

  21. R.T. Rockafellar, “New applications of duality in convex programming”, written version of talk presented at the Seventh International Symposium on Mathematical Programming, The Hague, 1970, and elsewhere; in:Proceedings of the fourth conference on probability theory, Brasov, Romania, 1971 (Editura Academici Republicii Socialiste Romania, Bucharest, 1973) pp. 73–81.

    Google Scholar 

  22. R.T. Rockafellar, “The multiplier method of Hestenes and Powell applied to convex programming”,Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 12 (6) (1973).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported in part by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research under grant AF-AFOSR-72-2269.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rockafellar, R.T. A dual approach to solving nonlinear programming problems by unconstrained optimization. Mathematical Programming 5, 354–373 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01580138

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01580138

Keywords

Navigation