Skip to main content
Log in

Generalizations of Slater's constraint qualification for infinite convex programs

  • Published:
Mathematical Programming Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we study constraint qualifications and duality results for infinite convex programs (P)μ = inf{f(x): g(x) ∈ − S, x ∈ C}, whereg = (g 1,g 2) andS = S 1 ×S 2,S i are convex cones,i = 1, 2,C is a convex subset of a vector spaceX, andf andg i are, respectively, convex andS i -convex,i = 1, 2. In particular, we consider the special case whenS 2 is in afinite dimensional space,g 2 is affine andS 2 is polyhedral. We show that a recently introduced simple constraint qualification, and the so-called quasi relative interior constraint qualification both extend to (P), from the special case thatg = g 2 is affine andS = S 2 is polyhedral in a finite dimensional space (the so-called partially finite program). This provides generalized Slater type conditions for (P) which are much weaker than the standard Slater condition. We exhibit the relationship between these two constraint qualifications and show how to replace the affine assumption ong 2 and the finite dimensionality assumption onS 2, by a local compactness assumption. We then introduce the notion of strong quasi relative interior to get parallel results for more general infinite dimensional programs without the local compactness assumption. Our basic tool reduces to guaranteeing the closure of the sum of two closed convex cones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. Attouch and H. Brezis, “Duality for the sum of convex functions in general Banach spaces,” in: J.A. Barroso, ed.,Aspects of Mathematics and its Applications (Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, 1986) pp. 125–133.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Ben-Israel, A. Ben-Tal and S. Zlobec,Optimality in Nonlinear Programming: A Feasible Directions Approach (Wiley, New York, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  3. J.M. Borwein, V. Jeyakumar, A. Lewis and H. Wolkowicz, “Constrained approximation via convex programming,” Preprint, University of Waterloo (Waterloo, Ont., 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  4. J.M. Borwein and A.S. Lewis, “Partially finite convex programming,” Research Report, Dalhousie University (Halifax, NS, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  5. J.M. Borwein and H. Wolkowicz, “A simple constraint qualification in infinite dimensional programming,”Mathematical Programming 35 (1986) 83–96.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J.M. Borwein and H. Wolkowicz, “Characterization of optimality for the abstract convex program with finite dimensional range,”Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society (Series A) 30 (1981) 390–411.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J.M. Borwein and H. Wolkowicz, “Characterization of optimality without constraint qualification for the abstract convex program,”Mathmatical Programming Study 19 (1982) 77–100.

    Google Scholar 

  8. C.K. Chui, F. Deutsch and J.D. Ward, “Constrained best approximation in Hilbert space,”Constructive Approximation 6 (1990) 35–64.

    Google Scholar 

  9. F.H. Clarke,Optimization and Nonsmooth Analysis (Wiley, New York, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  10. B.D. Craven,Mathematical Programming and Control Theory (Chapman and Hall, London, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  11. R.B. Holmes,Geometric Functional Analysis and its Applications (Springer, Berlin, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  12. V. Jeyakumar and H. Wolkowicz, “Zero duality gaps in infinite dimensional programming,”Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 67 (1990) 87–108.

    Google Scholar 

  13. V. Klee, “A note on convex cones and constraint qualifications in infinite dimensional vector spaces,”Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 37 (1982) 277–284.

    Google Scholar 

  14. W. Krabs,Optimization and Approximation (Wiley, New York, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  15. C.A. Micchelli, P.W. Smith and J.D. Ward, “Constrained Lp approximation,”Constructive Approximation 1 (1985) 93–102.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A.L. Peressini,Ordered Topological Vector Spaces (Harper and Row, New York, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  17. R.T. Rockafellar,Conjugate Duality and Optimization (SIAM Publications, Philadelphia, PA, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  18. J.D. Ward, “Some constrained approximation problems,” in: C.K. Chui, L.L. Schumaker, J.D. Ward, eds.,Approximation Theory V (Academic Press, New York, 1986) 211–229.

    Google Scholar 

  19. H. Wolkowicz, “Some applications of optimization in matrix theory,”Linear Algebra and its Applications 40 (1981) 101–118.

    Google Scholar 

  20. H. Wolkowicz, “A strengthened test for optimality,”Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 35 (1981) 497–515.

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. Zowe, “The Slater condition in infinite dimensional vector spaces,”American Mathematical Monthly 87 (1980) 475–476.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jeyakumar, V., Wolkowicz, H. Generalizations of Slater's constraint qualification for infinite convex programs. Mathematical Programming 57, 85–101 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01581074

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01581074

Key words

Navigation