Skip to main content
Log in

The practice of corporate social performance in minority- versus nonminority-owned small businesses

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study compares corporate social performance in terms of charitable contributions of minority-owned and nonminority-owned small businesses. In this sample, minority-owned small businesses are younger, have less full-time employees, and lower annual sales. Minority-owned small businesses donate more funds to religious organizations than nonminority-owned small businesses. When annual sales are accounted for, minority-owned businesses contribute more total dollars to all charitable organizations than nonminority-owned firms. Suggestions for future research in this area are delineated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aupperle, K. E., A. B. Carroll, and J. D. Hatfield: 1985, ‘An Empirical Examination of the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability’,Academy of Management Journal 28(2), pp. 446–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berle, A. A., Jr. and G. C. Means: 1932,The Modern Corporation and Private Property (MacMillan, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowser, G. W.: 1981, ‘Who Seeks Management Assistance? A Study of Minority Entrepreneurs’,Journal of Small Business Management 19(4), pp. 24–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D. J. and J. B. King: 1982, ‘Small Business Ethics: Influence and Perceptions’,Journal of Small Business Management 20(1), pp. 11–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, L., J. M. Logsdon, W. Mitchell, W. Reiner, and D. Vogel: 1986, ‘Corporate Community Involvement in the San Francisco Bay Area’,California Management Review 28(3), pp. 122–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chrisman, J. J. and R. W. Archer: 1984, ‘Small Business Responsibility: Some Perceptions and Insights’,American Journal of Small Business 9(2), pp. 46–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B.: 1979, ‘A Three-dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Social Performance’,Academy of Management Review 4, pp. 497–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dadzie, K. Q. and Y. Cho: 1989, ‘Determinants of Minority Business Formation and Survival: An Empirical Assessment’,Journal of Small Business Management 27, pp. 56–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, L. W., Keim, G. D., and R. E. Meiners: 1982, ‘Corporate Contributions: Altruistic or For-profit?’,Academy of Management Journal 25, pp. 94–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomolka, E. G.: 1978, ‘The Social Responsibility of Minority-owned Small Business Companies’,American Journal of Small Business 2(4), pp. 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grebler, L., L. W. Moore, and R. C. Guzman: 1970,The Mexican-American People (Free Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, G. and G. Faux: 1969, ‘The Social Utility of Black Enterprise’, in W. F. Haddad and G. D. Pugh (eds.),Black Enterprise Development (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haley, U. C. V.: 1991, ‘Corporate Contributions as Managerial Masques: Reframing Corporate Contributions as Strategies to Influence Society’,Journal of Management Studies 28, pp. 485–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hisrich, R. D. and C. G. Brush: 1986,The Woman Entrepreneur (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, S. L.: 1976, ‘Executive Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility’,Business Horizons 19(3), pp. 34–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kedia, B. L. and E. C. Kuntz: 1981, ‘The Context of Social Performance: An Empirical Study of Texas Banks’, in L. E. Preston (ed.),Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy (Vol. 3) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT).

    Google Scholar 

  • Longenecker, J. G., J. A. McKinney, and C. W. Moore: 1989, ‘Ethics in Small Business’,Journal of Small Business Management 27(1), pp. 27–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S. A.: 1985,An Essential Grace: Funding Canada's Health Care, Education, Welfare, Religion and Culture (McClelland and Stewart, Toronto).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinex, J. L., Jr. and R. H. Mendoza: 1984,Chicano Psychology (2nd ed.) (Academic Press, Inc., Orlando, FL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mescon, T. S. and D. J. Tilson: 1987, ‘Corporate Philanthropy: A Strategic Approach to the Bottom-line’,California Management Review 29(2), pp. 49–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostlund, L. E.: 1977, ‘Attitudes of Managers Toward Corporate Social Policy’,California Management Review 19(4), pp. 35–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez, M. and A. Casteneda: 1974,Cultural Democracy, Bicognitive Developmental Education (Academic Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, D. M. and A. M. Gibson: 1990, ‘Methodology in Business Ethics Research: A Review and Critical Assessment’,Journal of Business Ethics 9(6), pp. 457–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, J.: 1988, ‘Who's the Boss?’,American Demographics 10(4), pp. 38–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonfield, M. C.: 1986, ‘An Exploratory Analysis of the Largest Black-owned U.S. Companies’,Journal of Small Business Management 24, pp. 9–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. K. and H. L. Smith: 1991, ‘Social Responsibility and Small Businesses: Suggestions for Research’,Journal of Small Business Management 29(1), pp. 30–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. K., S. L. Wartick, and H. L. Smith: 1991, ‘Integrating Corporate Social Performance and Stake-holder Management: Implications for a Research Agenda in Small Business’, in J. E. Post (ed.),Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy (Vol. 12) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), pp. 207–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullmann, A. A.: 1985, ‘Data in Search of a Theory: A Critical Examination of the Relationships Among Social Performance, Social Disclosure, and Economic Performance of U.S. Firms’,Academy of Management Review 10(3), pp. 540–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Commerce: 1987,United States County Business Patterns (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.).

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census: 1987,Survey of Minority-owned Enterprises (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Useem, M.: 1988, ‘Patterns of Corporate Contribution’,California Management Review 30(2), pp. 77–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Fleet, E. W. and D. D. Van Fleet: 1985, ‘Entrepreneurship and Black Capitalism’,American Journal of Small Business 30(2), pp. 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wokutch, R. E. and B. A. Spencer: 1987, ‘Corporate Saints and Sinners: The Effects of Philanthropic and Illegal Activity on Organizational Performance’,California Management Review 29(2), pp. 62–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. J.: 1990,Business and Society (Scott, Foresman/Little, Brown Higher Education, Glenview, IL).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Judith Kenner Thompson is an Assistant Professor of Business and Society at the University of New Mexico. Her work has appeared inResearch in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, Business Forum, and theJournal of Small Business Management.

Jacqueline N. Hood is an Assistant Professor of Organizational Behavior at the University of New Mexico. Her current research interests include gender issues in business, small business and entrepreneurship, and corporate social performance.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thompson, J.K., Hood, J.N. The practice of corporate social performance in minority- versus nonminority-owned small businesses. J Bus Ethics 12, 197–206 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01686447

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01686447

Keywords

Navigation