Abstract
The role of context and vowels among highly skilled native Arabic readers was investigated in this study. Sixty-eight high school participants were selected after reading a list of isolated words. Only the highly skilled students participated in this study. Each participant individually had to read aloud vowelized and unvowelized paragraphs, and vowelized and unvowelized lists of words. The results showed that vowels and context were significant facilitators of word recognition in Arabic orthography.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abu-Rabia, S., & Siegel, L. S. (1995). Different orthographies, different context effects: The effects of Arabic sentence context on skilled and poor readers.Reading Psychology, 16, 1–19.
Adams, M. J. (1990).Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. London: MIT Press.
Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 340–357.
Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1985). The locus of word-frequency effect in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production.Journal of Memory and Languages, 24, 89–106.
Becker, C. A. (1985). What do we really know about semantic context effects during reading? In D. Besner, T. Waller, & G. Mackinnon (Eds.),Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (pp. 125–166). New York: Academic Press.
Bentin, S. (1989). Orthography and phonology in lexical decisions: Evidence from repetition effects at different lags.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 61–72.
Bentin, S., & Frost, R. (1987). Processing lexical ambiguity and visual word recognition in a deep orthography.Memory & Cognition, 25, 13–23.
Briggs, P., Austin, S., & Underwood, G. (1984). The effects of sentence context in good and poor readers: A test of Stanovich's interactive-compensatory models.Reading Research Quarterly, 10, 54–61.
Bruck, M. (1990). Word-recognition skills of adults with childhood diagnoses of dyslexia.Developmental Psychology, 26, 439–454.
Chall, J. S. (1983).Learning to read: The great debate. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Chen, H. C. (1987). Character detection in reading Chinese: Effect of context display format.Chinese Journal of Psychology, 29, 45–50.
Chen, H. C. (1992). Reading comprehension in Chinese: Implications from character reading times. In H. C. Chen & O. J. L. Tzeng (Eds.),Language processing in Chinese (pp. 175–205). New York: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.
Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.),Surface dyslexia (pp. 301–330). London: Erlbaum.
Frost, R., & Bentin, S. (1992). Processing phonological and semantic ambiguity: Evidence from semantic priming at different SOAs.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 58–68.
Frost, R., Katz, R., & Bentin, S. (1987). Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: A multilingual comparison.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 104–111.
Goodman, K. S. (1976). Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. In H. Singer & R. Ruddle (Eds.),Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 497–08). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Gough, P. B.,& Hillinger, M. L. (1980). Learning to read: An unnatural act.Bulletin of the Orton Society, 30, 179–196.
Haywood, J. A., & Nahmad, H. M. (1965).The Arabic language: A new Arabic grammar of the written language. London: Percy Lund, Humphries.
Jobran, K. (1964).The writings of Jobran. Beirut: Dar-Alnasher.
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye-fixations to comprehension.Psychological Review, 4, 329–354.
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1987).The psychology of reading and language comprehension. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Koriat, A. (1984). Reading without vowels: Lexical access in Hebrew. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.),Attention and performance: Control of language processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Koriat, A. (1985). Lexical access for low and high frequency words in Hebrew.Memory & Cognition, 13, 378–14.
Navon, D., & Shimron, J. (1981). Does word naming involve grapheme-to-phoneme translation? Evidence from Hebrew.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 97–109.
Navon, D., & Shimron, J. (1984). Reading Hebrew: How necessary is graphemic representation of vowels? In L. Henderson (Ed.),Orthographies and reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Perfetti, C. A. (1985).Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
Perfetti, C. A., & Roth, S. (1981). Some of the interactive processes in reading and their role in reading skill. In A. Ledsgold & C. Perfetti. (Eds.),Interactive processes in reading (pp. 269–297). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pollatsek, A., Rayner, K., & Balota, D. A. (1986). Inferences about eye movement control from the perceptual span in reading.Perception and Psychophysics, 40, 123–130.
Ryan, A., & Meara, P. (1991). The case of the invisible vowels: Arabic speakers reading English words.Reading in a Foreign Language, 7, 531–541.
Schwantes, P. M. (1985). Expectancy, integration, and interactional processes: Age differences in the nature of words affected by sentence context.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 39, 212–229.
Shimron, J. (1993). The role of vowels in reading: A review of studies of English and Hebrew.Psychological Bulletin, 114, 52–67.
Shimron, J., & Sivan, T. (1994). Reading proficiency and orthography: Evidence from Hebrew and English.Language Learning, 44, 5–27.
Simpon, G. B., & Foster, M. R. (1986). Lexical ambiguity and children's word recognition.Developmental Psychology, 22, 147–154.
Smith, F. (1979).Reading without nonsense. New York: Teachers College Press.
Stanovich, K. E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency.Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 32–71.
Stanovich, K. E. (1982). Individual differences in the cognitive processes in reading: II. Text level processes.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 15, 549–554.
Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy.Reading Research Quarterly, 4, 360–407.
Stanovich, K. E. (1992). The psychology of reading: Evolutionary and revolutionary developments.Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 12, 13–30.
Stanovich, K. E., & Feeman, D. J. (1981). A longitudinal study of sentence context effects in second-grade children: Tests of an interactive-compensatory model.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 32, 185–199.
West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (1978). Automatic contextual facilitation in readers of three ages.Child Development, 49, 717–727.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abu-Rabia, S. The role of vowels and context in the reading of highly skilled native Arabic readers. J Psycholinguist Res 25, 629–641 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01712413
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01712413