Skip to main content
Log in

Two-level multipoint constraint approximation concept for structural optimization

  • Technical Papers
  • Published:
Structural optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A two-level multipoint approximation concept is proposed. Based upon the values and the first-order derivatives of the critical constraint functions at the points obtained in the procedure of optimization, explicit functions approximating the primal constraint functions have been created. The nonlinearities of the approximate functions are controlled to be near those of the constraint functions in their expansion domains. Based on the principle above, the first-level sequence of explicitly approximate problems used to solve the primarily structural optimization problem are constructed. Each of them is approximated again by the second-level sequence of approximate problems, which are formed by using the linear Taylor series expansion and then solved efficiently with dual theory. Typical numerical examples including optimum design for trusses and frames are solved to illustrate the power of the present method. The computational results show that the method is very efficient and no intermediate/generalized design variable is required to be selected. It testifies to the adaptability and generality of the method for complex problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Fleury, C. 1979: Structural weight optimization by dual convex programming.Int. J. Num. Meth. Eng. 14, 1761–1783

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleury, C.; Schmit, L.A. 1980: Dual method and approximation in structural synthesis.NASA CR-3226

  • Huang, J.C.; Xia, R.W.; He, Q.Z. 1988: An adaptive structural synthesis method.Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica 9, A119-A128

    Google Scholar 

  • Haftka, R.T.et al. 1987: Two-point constraint approximation in structural optimization.Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng. 60, 289–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Lust, R.V.; Schmit, L.A. 1985: Alternative approximation concepts for space frame synthesis.NASA CR-172526

  • Prasad, B. 1983a: Approximation, adaptation and automation concepts for large-scale structural optimization.Eng. Opt. 6, 129–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad, B. 1983b: Novel concepts for constraint treatments and approximation in efficient structural synthesis.AIAA 83-0940

  • Prasad, B. 1984: Explicit constraint approximation form.Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng. 46, 15–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Quian, L.X.et al. 1980: Optimum design of structures with multiple types of element under multiple loading case and multiple constraints — program system DDDU.J. Dalian Institute of Technology 19, 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmit, L.A.; Fleury, C. 1980: Structural synthesis by combining approximation concepts and dual methods.AIAA J. 18, 1252–1260

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmit, L.A.; Miura, H. 1976: Approximation concepts for efficient structural synthesis.NASA CR-2552

  • Vanderplaats, G.N.; Salajegheh, E. 1989: New approximation method for stress constraints in structural synthesis.AIAA J. 27, 352–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkayya, V.B. 1971: Design of optimum structures.Comput. & Struct. 1, 265–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Xia, R.W.; Liu, P. 1987: Structural optimization based on second-order approximations of function and dual theory.Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng. 65, 101–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, M.; Xia, R.W. 1990: Two-level approximation concept in structural synthesis.Int. J. Num. Meth. Eng. 29, 1681–1699

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huang, H., Xia, R.W. Two-level multipoint constraint approximation concept for structural optimization. Structural Optimization 9, 38–45 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01742643

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01742643

Keywords

Navigation