Skip to main content
Log in

On options for interdisciplinary analysis and design optimization

  • Originals
  • Published:
Structural optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The interdisciplinary optimization of engineering systems is discussed from the standpoint of the computational alternatives available to the designer. The analysis of such systems typically requires the solution of coupled systems of nonlinear algebraic equations. The solution procedure is necessarily iterative in nature. It is shown that the system can be solved by fixed point iteration, by Newton's method, or by a combination of the two. However, the need for sensitivity analysis may affect the choice of analysis solution method. Similarly, the optimization of the system can be formulated in several ways that are discussed in the paper. It is shown that the effect of the topology of the interaction between disciplines is a key factor in the choice of analysis, sensitivity and optimization methods. Several examples are presented to illustrate the discussion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdi, F.F.; Ide, H.; Levine, M.; Austel, L.G. 1988: The art of spacecraft design: a multidisciplinary challenge.Proc. 2nd NASA/Airforce Symp. Recent Advances in Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization (held in Hampton, VA), pp. 1137–1156

  • Adelman, H.M.; Mantay, W.R. (1988): An initiative in optimization of rotorcraft.Proc. 2nd NASA/Airforce Symposium on Recent Advances in Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization (held in Hampton, VA), pp. 109–144

  • Barthelemy, B.; Chon, C.T.; Haftka, R.T. 1988: Accuracy problems associated with semi-analytical derivatives of static response.Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 4, 249–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Consoli, R.D.; Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J. 1990: Application of advanced multidisciplinary analysis and optimization methods to vehicle design synthesis.Proc. 17th Cong. Int. Council Aeronautical Sciences (ICAS) (held in Stockholm)9, pp. 17–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallman, J.W.; Kroo, I.M.; Smith, S.C. 1990: Preliminary design optimization of joined-wing aircraft.Proc. 3rd NASA/Airforce Symp. Recent Advances in Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization (held in San Francisco, CA), pp. 439–444

  • Grossman, B.; Haftka, R.T.; Kao, P.-J.; Polen, D.M.; Rais-Rohani, M.; Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J. 1989: Integrated aerodynamic structural design of a transport wing.AIAA Paper 89-2129 (presented at the AIAA/AHS/ASEE Aircraft Design, Systems and Operations Conf., held in Seattle, WA)

  • Haftka, R.T. 1990: Integrated structure-control optimization of space structures:Proc. AIAA Dynamics Specialist Conf. (held in Long Beach, CA), pp. 1–9

  • Haftka, R.T.; Grossman, B.; Eppard, W.M.; Kao, P.-J.; Polen, D. 1989: Efficient optimization of integrated aerodynamic-structural design.Int. J. Num. Meth. Engrg. 28, 593–607

    Google Scholar 

  • Haftka, R.T.; Gürdal, Z.; Kamat, M.P. 1990:Elements of structural optimization. Dordrecht: Kluwer

    Google Scholar 

  • Ide, H.; Levine, M. 1989: Use of second order CFD generated global sensitivity derivatives for coupled problems.AIAA Paper No 89-1178 (presented at 30th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conf., held in Mobile, AL)

  • Livne, E.; Schmit, L.; Friedmann, P. 1990: Exploratory design studies using an integrated multidisciplinary synthesis capability for actively controlled composite wings.Proc. AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC 31st Structures, Structural Dynamics and Material Conference (held in Long Beach, CA),Part 1, 97–109

  • Padula, S.L.; Polignone, D.A. 1990: New evidence favoring multilevel decomposition and optimization. Paper presented at 3rd NASA/Air Force Symp. Recent Advances in Multidisciplinary Analysis and Design (held in San Francisco, CA)

  • Padula, S.L.; James, B.B.; Graves, P.C.; Woodard, S.E. 1991: Multidisciplinary optimization of controlled space structures with global sensitivity equations.NASA TP 3130

  • Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J. 1988a, 1990: Sensitivity of complex, internally coupled systems.AIAA Paper 88-2378; alsoAIAA J. 28, 153–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J. 1988b: Sensitivity analysis and multidisciplinary optimization for aircraft design: recent advances and results.Paper ICAS-988-1.7.3, 16th C. of the International Council of the Aeronautical sciences (held in Jerusalem), pp. 953–964

  • Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J. 1990: Higher order sensitivity analysis of complex, coupled systems.AIAA J. 28, 756–758

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J.; James, B.B.; Riley, M.F. 1987: Structural sizing by generalized, multilevel optimization.AIAA J. 25, 139–145

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haftka, R.T., Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J. & Padula, S.L. On options for interdisciplinary analysis and design optimization. Structural Optimization 4, 65–74 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01759919

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01759919

Keywords

Navigation