Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: Viewing streams in a watershed context

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Classification of streams and stream habitats is useful for research involving establishment of monitoring stations, determination of local impacts of land-use practices, generalization from site-specific data, and assessment of basin-wide, cumulative impacts of human activities on streams and their biota. This article presents a frame-work for a hierarchical classification system, entailing an organized view of spatial and temporal variation among and within stream systems. Stream habitat systems, defined and classified on several spatiotemporal scales, are associated with watershed geomorphic features and events. Variables selected for classification define relative long-term capacities of systems, not simply short-term states. Streams and their watershed environments are classified within the context of a regional biogeoclimatic landscape classification. The framework is a perspective that should allow more systematic interpretation and description of watershed-stream relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  • Allen, T. F. H., and T. B. Starr. 1982. Hierarchy: perspectives for ecological complexity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 310 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baily, R. G. 1983. Delineation of ecosystem regions.Environmental Management 7:365–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beschta, R. L. 1979. Debris removal and its effects on sedimentation in an Oregon Coast Range stream.Northwest Science 53:71–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilby, R. E. 1981. Role of organic debris dams in regulating the export of dissolved and particulate matter from a forested watershed.Ecology 62:1234–1243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisson, P. A., J. L. Nielsen, R. A. Palmason, and L. E. Grove. 1982. A system of naming habitat types in small streams, with examples of habitat utilization by salmonids during low stream flow.In N. B. Armantrout (ed.), Acquisition and utilization of aquatic habitat inventory information. Proceedings of a symposium, 28–30 October 1981, Portland Oregon. American Fisheries Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, D. A., G. W. Minshall, C. E. Cushing, K. W. Cummings, J. T. Brock, and R. L. Vannote. 1984. Tributaries as modifiers of the river continuum concept: analysis by polar ordination and regression models.Archives of Hydrobiology 99:208–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, M. D. 1980. Evolution of large, organic debris after timber harvest: Maybeso Creek, 1949 to 1978. US Department of Agriculture Forest Service general technical report PNW-69.

  • Carling, P. A., and N. A. Reader. 1982. Structure, composition, and bulk properties of upland stream gravels.Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 7:349–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cline, M. G. 1949. Basic principles of soil classification.Soil Science 67:81–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, K. W., and G. H. Lauff. 1969. The influences of substrate particle size on the microdistribution of stream benthos.Hydrobiologia 34:145–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daubenmire, R. 1968. Plant communities. Harper and Row, New York. 300 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, I. 1977. Humid landforms. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. 288 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudgeon, D. 1982. Spatial and temporal changes in the sediment characteristics of Tai Po Kau Forest Stream, New Territories, Hong Kong, with some preliminary observations upon within-reach variations in current velocity.Archives of Hydrobiology, Supplement 64:36–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elton, C. S. 1966. The pattern of animal communities, Methuen, London. 432 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frissell, C. A. 1986. A hierarchical stream habitat classification system: development and demonstration. MS thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon. 103 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frissell, C. A., and W. J. Liss. 1986. Stream habitat structure and dynamics in logged and old-growth watersheds, Coast Range of Oregon. (In press.)

  • Godfrey, A. E. 1977. A physiographic approach to land use planning.Environmental Geology 2:43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gore, J. A. 1982. Benthic invertebrate colonization: source distance effects on community composition.Hydrobiologia 94:183–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, O. T., and J. R. Karr. 1978. Habitat structure and stream fish communities.Ecology 59:507–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hack, J. T. 1957. Studies of longitudinal stream profiles in Virginia and Maryland. US Geological Survey professional paper 294-B:45–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall J. D., and N. J. Knight. 1981. Natural variation in abundance of salmonid populations in streams and its implications for design of impact studies. USEPA ecological research series EPA-600/S3-81-021. 85 pp.

  • Hart, D. D. 1981. Foraging and resource patchiness: field experiments with a grazing stream insect.Oikos 37:46–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, C. P. 1985. Substrate associations and longitudinal distributions in species of Ephemerellidae (Ephemeroptera: Insecta) from western Oregon.Freshwater Invertebrate Biology 4:181–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heede, B. H. 1972. Influences of a forest on the hydraulic geometry of two mountain streams.Water Resources Bulletin 8:523–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, C. G. 1984. Piping and sapping: development of landforms by groundwater outflow. Pages 19–58in R. G. LaFleur (ed.), Groundwater as a geomorphic agent. Allen and Unwin, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, R. E. 1945. Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins: hydrophysical approach to quantitative geomorphology.Bulletin of the Geological Society of America 56:275–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hynes, H. B. N. 1970. The ecology of running waters. University of Toronto Press, Toronto. 555 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hynes, H. B. N. 1975. The stream and its valley.Proceedings of the International Association of Theoretical and Applied Limnology 19:1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, W. L., and R. L. Beschta. 1982. A model of two-phase bedload transport in an Oregon Coast Range stream.Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 7:517–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, R. A., K. R. Wade, and E. Pugh. 1984. Macroinvertebrate-habitat relationships in the River Teifi catchment and the significance to conservation.Freshwater Biology 14:23–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, E. A. 1972. Development of alluvial stream channels: a five stage model.Geological Society of America Bulletin 83:1531–1536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, E. A., and W. N. Melhorn. 1973. Bedforms and fluvial processes in alluvial stream channels: selected observations. Pages 253–283in M. Morisawa (ed.), Fluvial geomorphology. Proceedings, 4th annual geomorphology symposium, SUNY, Binghamton, New York. Allen and Unwin, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, E. A., and F. J. Swanson. 1979. Effects of large organic material on channel form and fluvial processes.Earth Surface Processes 4:361–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, E. A., and T. Tally. 1979. Effects of large organic debris on channel form and fluvial processes in the coastal redwood environment. Pages 169–197in D. D. Rhodes and G. P. Williams (eds.), Adjustments of the fluvial system. Proceedings, 10th annual geomorphology symposium, SUNY, Binghamton, New York, Kendall/Hunt, Dubuque, Iowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knighton, A. D. 1982. Longitudinal changes in the size and shape of stream bed material: evidence of variable transport conditions.Catena 9:25–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laronne, J. B., and M. A. Carson. 1976. Interrelationships between bed morphology and bed-material transport for a small gravel-bed channel.Sedimentology 23:67–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre, L., and S. Demers. 1984. Towards dynamic biological oceanography and limnology.Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 41:2–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenat, D. R., D. L. Penrose, and K. W. Eagleson. 1981. Variable effects of sediment addition on stream benthos.Hydrobiologia. 79:187–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, L. B. 1969. The rapids and pools: Grand Canyon. US Geological Survey professional paper 669:131–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linduska, J. P. 1942. Bottom type as a factor influencing the local distribution of mayfly nymphs.Canadian Entomologist 74:26–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotspeich, F. B., and W. S. Platts. 1982. An integrated landaquatic classification system.North American Journal of Fisheries Management 2:138–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAuliffe, J. R. 1983. Colonization patterns, competition, and disturbance in stream communities. Pages 137–155in J. R. Barnes and G. W. Minshall (eds.), Stream ecology: application and testing of general ecological theory. Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Megahan, W. F. 1982. Channel sediment storage behind obstructions in forested drainage basins draining the granitic bedrock of the Idaho Batholith. Pages 114–121in F. J. Swanson, R. J. Janda, T. Dunne, and D. N. Swanston (eds.), Sediment budgets and routing in forested drainage basins. US Department of Agriculture Forest Service general technical report PNW-141.

  • Miller, J. P. 1958. High mountain streams: effects of geology on channel characteristics and bed material. New Mexico State Bureau of Mines and Mine Resources memoir 4. 51 pp.

  • Minshall, G. W., R. C. Petersen, K. W. Cummins, T. C. Bott, J. R. Sedell, and C. E. Cushing. 1983. Interbiome comparison of stream ecosystem dynamics.Ecological Monographs 51:1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, H. P. 1939. Aspects of the ecology of aquatic insects.Transactions of the Society of British Entomologists 61:39–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosely, M. P. 1981. The influence of organic debris on channel morphology and bedload transport in a New Zealand stream.Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 6:571–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murgatroyd, A. L., and J. E. Ternan. 1983. Impact of afforestation on stream bank erosion and channel form.Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 8:357–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, A. J., and A. Watson. 1983. Medium-term effects of two landsliding episodes on channel storage of sediment.Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 8:29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peckarsky, B. L., and S. I. Dodson, 1980. An experimental analysis of biological factors contributing to stream community structure.Ecology 61:1283–1290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennak, R. W. 1971. Toward a classification of lotic habitats.Hydrobiologia 38:321–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, P. J., and J. M. Harlin. 1984. Spatial dependency of hydraulic geometry exponents in a subalpine stream.Journal of Hydrology 71:277–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platts, W. S. 1974. Geomorphic and aquatic conditions influencing salmonids and stream classification with application to ecosystem classification. Surface Environment and Mining. US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Billings, Montana. 199 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platts, W. S. 1979. Including the fishery system in land planning. US Department of Agriculture Forest Service general technical report INT-60. 37 pp.

  • Rabeni, C. F., and G. W. Minshall. 1977. Factors affecting microdistribution of stream benthic insects.Oikos 29:33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reice, S. R. 1974. Environmental patchiness and the breakdown of leaf litter in a woodland stream.Ecology 55:1271–1282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resh, V. H. 1983. Spatial differences in the distribution of benthic macroinvertebrates along a springbrook.Aquatic Insects 5:193–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruhe, R. V. 1975. Geomorphology: geomorphic processes and surficial geology. Houghton Mifflin, Boston. 246 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumm, S. A. 1960. The shape of alluvial channels in relation to sediment type. US Geological Survey professional paper 352-B:17–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumm, S. A., and R. W. Lichty. 1965. Time, space, and causality in geomorphology.American Journal of Science 263:110–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, A. L. 1984. Colonization dynamics of aquatic insects. Pages 401–429in V. H. Resh and D. Rosbenberg (eds.), Ecology of aquatic insects: a life history and habitat approach. Praeger, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shreve, R. L. 1967. Infinite topologically random channel networks.Journal of Geology 75:178–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slack, K. V. 1955. A study of the factors affecting stream productivity by the comparative method.Investigations of Indiana Lakes and Streams 4:3–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. J., and H. W. Li. 1983. Energetic factors influencing foraging tactics of juvenile steelhead trout,Salmo gairdneri. Pages 173–180in L. G. Noakes and others (eds.), Predator and prey in fishes. W. Junk, The Hague, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Staff. 1975. Soil taxonomy. US Department of Agriculture handbook 436. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. 754 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southwood, T. R. E. 1977. Habitat, the templet for ecological strategies?Journal of Animal Ecology 46:337–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strahler, A. N. 1952. Hypsometric (area-altitude) analysis of erosional topography.Bulletin of the Geological Society of America 63:1117–1141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strahler, A. N. 1964. Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basins and channel networks. Pages 40–74in V. T. Chan (ed.), Handbook of applied hydrology. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strayer, D. 1983. The effects of surface geology and stream size on freshwater mussel (Bivalvia, Unionidae) distribution in southeastern Michigan, U.S.A.Freshwater Biology 13:235–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, F. J., and C. T. Dyrness. 1975. Impact of clear-cutting and road construction on soil erosion by landslides in the Western Cascade Range, Oregon.Geology 33:393–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, F. J., and G. W. Leinkaemper. 1978. Physical consequences of large organic debris in Pacific Northwest streams. US Department of Agriculture Forest Service general technical report PNW-69. 12 pp.

  • Teti, P. 1984. Time-variant differences in chemistry among four smaller streams.Water Resources Research 20:347–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triska, F. J., J. R. Sedell, and S. V. Gregory. 1982. Coniferous forest streams. Pages 293–332in R. L. Edmonds (ed.), Analysis of coniferous forest ecosystems in the western United States. US/IBP synthesis series 14. Hutchison Ross, Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Deusen, R. D. 1954. Maryland freshwater stream classification by watersheds.Chesapeake Biological Laboratory 106:1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vannote, R. L., G. W. Minshall, K. W. Cummins, J. R. Sedell, and C. E. Cushing. 1980. The river continuum concept.Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 37:130–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, C. E. 1979. Toward classification and rationale for watershed management and stream protection. USEPA ecological research series EPA-600/3-79-059. 143 pp.

  • Warren, C. E., J. Allen, and J. W. Haefner. 1979. Conceptual frameworks and the philosophical foundations of general living systems theory.Behavioral Science 24:296–310.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, C. E., and W. J. Liss. 1983. Systems classification and modeling of watersheds and streams. Unpublished report, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon. 193 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, E. 1978. The equilibrium of natural streams. Geo Abstracts, Norwich, UK. 205 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wevers, M. J., and C. E. Warren. 1986. A perspective on stream community organization, structure, and development.Archives of Hydrobiology (in press).

  • Wolman, M. G., and R. Gerson. 1978. Relative scales of time and effectiveness of climate in watershed geomorphology.Earth Surface Processes 3:189–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolman, M. G., and J. P. Miller. 1960. Magnitude and frequency of forces in geomorphic processes.Journal of Geology 68:54–74.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Oak Creek Laboratory of Biology Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, 97331, Corvallis, Oregon, USA

    Christopher A. Frissell, William J. Liss, Charles E. Warren & Michael D. Hurley

Authors
  1. Christopher A. Frissell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. William J. Liss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Charles E. Warren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michael D. Hurley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frissell, C.A., Liss, W.J., Warren, C.E. et al. A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: Viewing streams in a watershed context. Environmental Management 10, 199–214 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01867358

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01867358

Key words

Search

Navigation