Abstract
A critical shortcoming of methods that are reliant upon the judgment of experts to determine site suitability is noted. The article introduces a new method, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) with which error in judging the relative importance of factors in site suitability analysis can be both detected and corrected. The proposed approach is illustrated with an example to show how the AHP frames the site evaluation problem and can aid in decision making involving multiple criteria, factor diversity, and conditions of uncertainty. The article concludes by suggesting the potential application of the AHP in public choice decisions involving complex, controversial, and conflictual site selection processes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature cited
Anderson, L. T. 1987. Seven methods for calculating land capability/suitability. Planning advisory service (PAS) report No. 402. American Planning Association, Chicago: 20 PP.
Banai-Kashani, A. R. 1987. A new paradigm for planning simulation. Pages 131–136 In E. Alexander (ed.), Proceedings of the 1987 international congress on planning and design theory. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York.
Banai-Kashani, A. R. 1988. Toward a synthetic measure of good settlement form.Environment and Planning 15B:399–412.
Buchanan, J. M., and G. Tullock. 1965. The calculus of consent. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor. 316 pp.
Chapin, F. S., and E. J. Kaiser. 1979. Urban land use planning. University of Illinois Press, Chicago.
Dee, N., J. K. Baker, N. L. Drobry, K. M. Duke, I. Whitman, and D. Fabringer. 1973. An environmental evaluation system for water resources planning.Water Resources Research 9(2):523–535.
Expert Choice. 1988. Software Package. Decision Support Software, McLean, Virginia.
Hall, P. 1980. Great planning disasters. University of California Press, Berkeley, California. 308 pp.
Hopkins, L. D. 1977. Methods of generating land suitability maps: A comparative evaluation.Journal of the American Institute of Planners 43(4):386–400.
Hughes, W. 1986. Deriving utilities using the analytic hierarchy process.Socio-Economic Planning Science 20(6):393–395.
Leopold, L. B., F. E. Clarke, B. B. Hanshaw, and J. R. Balsley. 1971. A procedure for evaluating environmental impact. Geological survey circular 645. US Geological Survey, Washington, DC.
Lynch, K. 1984. A theory of good city form. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusettes.
McHarg, I. 1969. Design with nature. Natural History Press, New York. 197 pp.
Miller, G. A. 1956. The magical number seven plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.Psychological Review 63:81–97.
Nijkamp, P., and H. Voogd. 1983. A survey of multicriteria analysis for development planning. Pages 217–229in L. Chatterjee, P. Nijkamp (eds.), Urban and regional policy analysis in developing countries. Gower, Boston.
Saaty, R. W. 1987. The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used.Mathematical Modelling. 9(3–5):161–176.
Saaty, R. W., and L. G. Vargas (eds.). 1987. The analytic hierarchy process.Mathematical Modelling 9(3–5).
Saaty, T. L. 1977. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures.Journal of Mathematical Psychology 15(3):234–281.
Saaty, T. L. 1980. The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York. 287 pp.
Saaty, T. L. 1982. Decision-making for leaders. Lifetime Learning, San Francisco. 291 pp.
Saaty, T. L. 1987. Rank generation, preservation, and reversal in the analytic hierarchy decision process.Decision Sciences 18:157–177.
Saaty, T. L., and J. M. Alexander. 1977. The forward and backward processes of conflict analysis.Behavioral Science 22:87–98.
Saaty, T. L., and L. Vargas. 1982. The logic of priorities. Kluwer/Nijhoff, Boston. 299 pp.
Simon, H. 1981. The sciences of the artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 247 pp.
Simon, H. 1983. Reason in human affairs. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California. 115 pp.
Steiner, F. 1983. Resource suitability: Methods for analyses.Environmental Management. 7(5):401–420.
Steiner, F. 1987. Agricultural land evaluation and site assessment in the United States: An introduction.Environmental Management 11(3):375–377.
USDA (Department of Agriculture). 1983. National agricultural land evaluation and site assessment handbook. Soil Conservation Service, Washington, DC.
Vargas, L. G. 1987. Priority theory and utility theory.Mathematical Modeling 9(3–5):381–385.
Wright, L. E., W. Zitzmann, K. Young, and R. Googins. 1983. LESA—agricultural land evaluation and site assessment.Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 38(2):82–86.
Zahedi, F. 1986. The analytic hierarchy process—a survey of the method and its applications.Interfaces 16(4):96–108.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Banai-Kashani, R. A new method for site suitability analysis: The analytic hierarchy process. Environmental Management 13, 685–693 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01868308
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01868308