Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Environmental and sustainability indicators and the concept of situational indicators. A systems approach

  • Integrated Assessment
  • Published:
Environmental Modeling & Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Through a systems approach indicators are shown to have the nature of variables, adopting different values or states, while other associated terms allude to special meanings assigned to specific values of the indicators. Practical implications are discussed. The concept of situational indicators of sustainability is introduced, representing a non-numerical function of both “pressures” or “driving forces” and “state” variables. A cost-effective multi-tiered approach to situational indicators is proposed. The concept of situational indicators is shown to be a particular case of indicators of systems behavior. A general systems formulation of the problem of sustainability highlights the importance of indicators of systems behavior and the central role of models in their definition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Adriaanse,Environmental Policy Performance Indicators, SDV, The Hague, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  2. W.R. Ashby, Analysis of the system to be modeled, in:The Process of Model-Building, R.M. Stogdill (ed.), Ohio University Press, Columbus, 1970, pp. 94–114.

    Google Scholar 

  3. W.R. Ashby,An Introduction to Cybernetics, Chapman & Hall Ltd., London, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J.A. Bakkes, G.J. van den Born, J.C. Helder, R.J. Swart, C.W. Hope and J.D.E. Parker, An overview of environmental indicators: State of the art and perspectives, UNEP/EATR.94-01; RIVM/402001001, Environmental Assessment Sub-Programme; UNEP, Nairobi, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  5. E.J. Borowski and J.M. Borwein,The Harper Collins Dictionary of Mathematics, Harper Collins, New York, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Braun-Blanquet,Plant Sociology. The Study of Plant Communities, Hafner, New York, 1972 (facsimile of the 1932 edition).

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. Bryant, E. Rodenburg, T. Cox and D. Nielsen, Coastlines at risk: An index of potential development-related threats to coastal ecosystems, WRI Indicator Brief, The World Resources Institute, Washington, DC, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Bugnicourt, Three futures for Africa, Mazingira 10 (1979) 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R.E. Cavallo,The Role of Systems Methodology in Social Science Research, Martinus Nijhoff, Boston, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. Chevalier et al.,User Guide to 40 Community Health Indicators, Community Health Division, Health and Welfare Canada, Ottawa, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Cohon and D. Marks, A review and evaluation of multi-objective programming techniques, Water Resources Research 11 (1975) 208–220.

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. Dansereau, Dimensions of environmental quality, Sarracenia 14(1971) 1–109.

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. Dansereau, An Ecological framework for the amenities of the city, Diogenes 98 (1977) 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  14. N. Dee, J.K. Baker, N.L. Drobny, K.M. Duke and D.C. Fahringer, Environmental evaluation system for water resource planning, Final Rep., Battelle Columbus Labs., Columbus, OH, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  15. G.E.A. Dever,Community Health Analysis, Aspen Systems Corporation, Germantown, MD, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Easton,Complex Managerial Decisions Involving Multiple Objectives, Wiley, New York, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  17. G.C. Gallopín, Basic needs and environmental quality, Report to UNEP, Ecological Systems Analysis Group, S.C. Bariloche, Argentina, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  18. G.C. Gallopín, Environment of a system, in:Systems and Control Encyclopeadia, M.G. Singh (ed.), Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1987, pp. 1486–1489.

    Google Scholar 

  19. G.C. Gallopin, Human dimensions of global change: linking the global and the local processes, Int. Social Science Journal 130 (1991) 707–718.

    Google Scholar 

  20. G.C. Gallopín,Impoverishment and Sustainable Development. A Systems Approach, International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  21. G.C. Gallopín, Agroecosystem health: A guiding concept for agricultural research?, in:Agroecosystem Health. Proceedings of an International Workshop, O. Nielsen (ed.), University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada, 1994, pp. 51–65.

    Google Scholar 

  22. G.C. Gallopín, The potential of agroecosystems health as a guiding concept for agricultural research, Ecosystem Health 1(3) (1995) 129–140.

    Google Scholar 

  23. G.C. Gallopín, P. Gutman and H. Maletta, Global impoverishment, sustainable development and the environment. A conceptual approach, Int. Social Science Journal 121 (1989) 375–397.

    Google Scholar 

  24. A. Gill, Finite-state systems, in:System Theory, L.A. Zadeh and E. Polak (eds.), McGraw-Hill, New York, 1969, pp. 43–94.

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. Ignizio,Linear Programming in Single and Multiple-Objective Systems, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  26. A. Hammond, A. Adriaanse, E. Rodenburg, D. Bryant and R. Woodward, Environmental indicators: A systematic approach to measuring and reporting on environmental policy performance in the context of sustainable development, World Resources Institute, Washington, DC, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  27. C.S. Holling (ed.),Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management, Wiley, Chichester, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  28. G.J. Klir,An Approach to General Systems Theory, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  29. G.J. Klir,Architecture of Systems Problem Solving, Plenum Press, New York, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  30. S. Marcus, Towards a semiotic approach to social indicators, Paper presented at theInternational Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Salzburg, Austria, July 11–16, 1983.

  31. D. McQueen and H. Noak, Health promotion indicators: Current status, issues and problems, Health Promotion 3 (1988) 117–125.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Merriam-Webster Collegiate Dictionary, 10th edition.

  33. The State of the Environment, OECD, Paris, 1991.

  34. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Core Set of Indicators for Environmental Performance Reviews, A Synthesis Report by the Group on the State of the Environment, OECD, Paris, 1993.

  35. W.R. Ott,Environmental Indices. Theory and Practice, Ann Arbor Science, MI, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  36. S. Siegel,Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  37. W.M. Stigliani, Chemical time bombs: Definition, concepts and examples, Executive Report 16 (CTB Basic Document 1), IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  38. W.M. Stigliani et al., Chemical time bombs, Environment 33 (4) (1991) 4–9 and 26–30.

    Google Scholar 

  39. B.J.E. ten Brink, S.H. Hosper and F. Colijn, A quantitative method for description and assessment of ecosystems: The AMOEBA approach, Mar. Pol. Bul. 23 (1991) 265–270[4].

    Google Scholar 

  40. Monitoring Environmental Progress, The World Bank, Washington, DC, 1995.

  41. D. Tunstall, Developing environmental indicators: Definitions, framework, and issues (Draft Paper), Background Materials for the World Resources Institute, Workshop on Global Environmental Indicators, Washington, DC, December 7–8, 1992. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  42. D. Tunstall, Developing and using indicators of sustainable development in Africa: An overview (Draft Paper), Prepared for the Network for Environment and Sustainable Development in Africa (NESDA), Thematic Workshop on Indicators of Sustainable Development, Banjul, The Gambia, May 16–18, 1994.

  43. D.J. Thampapillai, Methods of multiple objective planning: a review, World Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology Abstracts 20(12) (1978) 803–813.

    Google Scholar 

  44. United Nations Department for Policy Coordination and Sustainable Development (UN-DPCSD),Work Programme on Indicators of Sustainable Development of the Commission on Sustainable Development, Division for Sustainable Development, UN-DPCSD, 1995.

  45. M. Winograd,Environmental Indicators for Latin America and the Caribbean: Toward Land-Use Sustainability, GASE-IICA/GTZ-OAS-WRS, World Resources Institute, Washington, DC, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), A.A. 6713, Cali, Colombia

    Gilberto C. Gallopín

Authors
  1. Gilberto C. Gallopín
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gallopín, G.C. Environmental and sustainability indicators and the concept of situational indicators. A systems approach. Environ Model Assess 1, 101–117 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01874899

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01874899

Keywords

Search

Navigation