Skip to main content
Log in

A contribution to the dispute on the Ortega hypothesis: Connection between publication rate and stratification of scientists, tested by various methods

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It was tested whether the publication rate of scientists as a rough measure of their “eminence”, influences their stratification. The stratification is reflected in cooperation, in co-authorships, in the structure of the citations and in the distribution of publications among the various problem areas of a scientific discipline. The findings of these investigations was discussed as a contribution to the dispute among authors who accept or reject the Ortega hypothesis which states that the research done by average scientists substantially contributes to the advance of science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W. E. SNIZEK, A Re-Examination of the Ortega Hypothesis: The Dutch Case,Scientometrics, 9 (1986) 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M. OROMANER, The Ortega Hypothesis and Influential Articles in American Sociology,Scientometrics, 7 (1985) 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J. COLE, S. COLE, The Ortega Hypothesis,Science, 178 (1972) 368.

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. A. GOUDSMIT, J. D. MC GERVEY, R. J. YAES, J. COLE, S. COLE, Citation Analysis,Science, (January 11, 1974).

  5. G. GREEN, A Test of the Ortega Hypothesis in Criminology,Criminology, 19 (1981) 45.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. J. MORAVCSIK, P. MURUGESAN, Some Results on the Function and Quality of Citations,Social Studies of Science, 5 (1975) 86.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. E. CHUBIN, S. D. MOITRA, Content Analysis of References: Adjunct or Alternative Citation Counting?Social Studies of Science, 5 (1975) 423.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. H. MC ROBERTS, B. R. MC ROBERTS, Quantitative Measures of Communication in Science: A Study of the Formal Level,Social Studies of Science, 16 (1986) 151.

    Google Scholar 

  9. K. D. KNORR, R. MITTERMEIER, G. AICHHOLZER, G. WALLER, Individual Publication Productivity as a Social Position Effect in Academic and Industrial Research Units, In: F. M. ANDREWS (Ed.),Scientific Productivity, Cambridge University Press, UNESCO, 1979.

  10. G. M. DOBROV,Wissenschaftswissenschaft, VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, Berlin 1970, p. 144.

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. R. HOFSTÄTTER,Gruppendinamik, Rowohlt, Hamburg 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. R. BLAU, Scientific Recognition: Academic Context and Professional Role,Social Studies of Science, 6 (1976) 533.

    Google Scholar 

  13. H. KRETSCHMER, Representation of a Complex Structure Measure for Social Groups and its Application to the Structure of Citations in a Journal,Scientometrics, 5 (1983) 5–30. H. KRETSCHMER, The Reflection of Lotka's Law in the Structure of Citations of a Journal,Scientometrics, 5 (1983) 85–92.

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. KRETSCHMER, J. VLACHY, Stratification of Journal Authors Revealed from Citation Networks,Czechoslovak Journal of Physics, B 36 (1986) 77–80.

    Google Scholar 

  15. H. KRETSCHMER, Cooperation Structure, Group Size and Productivity in Research Groups,Scientometrics, 7 (1985) 39–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, Register, 1.–25. Jahrgang, 1953–1977, VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, Berlin 1978.

  17. H. J. RAETTIG,Bakteriophagie 1957–1965, Teil I und II, Stuttgart 1967.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Some discussion papers abont the Ortega hypothesis were published in Scientometrics, 12 (1987) 293–353.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kretschmer, H., Müller, R. A contribution to the dispute on the Ortega hypothesis: Connection between publication rate and stratification of scientists, tested by various methods. Scientometrics 18, 43–56 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019161

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019161

Keywords

Navigation