Skip to main content
Log in

Using bibliometrics in strategic analysis: “understanding chemical reactions” at the CNRS

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article presents the results of a study carried out for CNRS policy makers. The goal of the study was two-fold: first, it was aimed at evaluating the research effort devoted to “understanding chemical reactions” both in France and throughout the world; second, it was designed to test the usefulness of bibliometric techniques for strategic analysis. One feature of this article merits special attention. It is co-signed by the researchers who carried out the study and by the policy makers for whom it was intended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes and references

  1. This practice is becoming more general. See for exampleM.P. Carpenter, F. Gibb, M. Harris, J. Irvine, B.R. Martin, F. Narin, Bibliometric profiles for British Academic Institutions: An experiment to develop research output indicators,Scientometrics, 14 (1988) 213–233.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Callon, L. Leydersdorf, La Recherche Française est-elle en bonne santé?,La Recherchè, 181(1987) 412–419.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Arvanitis, M. Callon, B. Latour, Evaluation des politiques publiques de la recherche et de la technologie,La Documentation Française, Paris, 1986, p. 89.

  4. G. Pimentel,Opportunities in Chemistry, National Academic Press, Washington, D.C., P vii+344, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See for exampleD. de Solla Price,Little Science, Big Science, New York, Columbia University Press, 1963;B. Latour, S. Woolgar,Laboratory Life: the Social Construction of Scientific Facts. London and Beverly Hills, Sage, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. Small, Co-citations in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relation between two documents,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24 (1973) 265–269;H. Small, E. Sweeney, Clustering the Science citation Index using co-citations, I A comparison of methods,Scientometrics, 7, (1985) 391–400;H. Small, E. Sweeney, Clustering the Science Citation Index using co-citations, II. Mapping science,Scientometrics, 8 (1985) 391–400;H. Small, E. Garfield, The geography of science: Disciplinary and nation mappings,Journal of Information Science, 11 (1985) 147–159.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Callon, J.P. Courtial, W.A. Turner, S. Bauin, From translation to problematic neworks: An introduction to co-word analysis,Social Science Information, 22, No. 2 (1983) 191–235;M. Callon, J. Law, A. Rip (Eds),Mapping the Dinamics of Science, London, MacMillan, 1986;J. Law, S. Bauin, J.P. Courtial, J. Whittaker, Policy and the mapping of scientific change: A co-word analysis of research into environmental acidification,Scientomterics, 14, (1988) 251–264.

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. Chartron, Lexicon management tools for large textual databases: the LEXINET system,Journal of Information Science, 15, No. 6 (1989) 000.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Bauin, B. Michelet, Comprendre la réaction chimique. Etude des tendances internationales par la méthode LEXIMAPPE,Rapport de fin d'étude, SERPIA/CDST, Paris, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  10. The simple sum of the values of the links is divergent.

  11. op. cit. note 9..

    Google Scholar 

  12. ibid..

    Google Scholar 

  13. ibid..

    Google Scholar 

  14. op. cit. note 1. This practice is becoming more general. See for example.

    Google Scholar 

  15. op. cit. note 2..

    Google Scholar 

  16. CNRS,Schéma Directeur, Politique Générale 1986–1988, Paris, 1986, p. 196.

  17. op. cit. note 2..

    Google Scholar 

  18. See the article byM. Callon, J.P. Courtial, F. Laville in this issue.

  19. We are thinking in particular here of naming the themes, which risk being obscure and even a possible source of confusion if one does not consult the report's appendixes.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bauin, S., Michelet, B., Schweighoffer, M.G. et al. Using bibliometrics in strategic analysis: “understanding chemical reactions” at the CNRS. Scientometrics 22, 113–137 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019278

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019278

Keywords

Navigation