Skip to main content
Log in

A method for molecular phylogeny construction by direct use of nucleotide sequence data

  • Published:
Journal of Molecular Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A method for molecular phylogeny construction is newly developed. The method, called the stepwise ancestral sequence method, estimates molecular phylogenetic trees and ancestral sequences simultaneously on the basis of parsimony and sequence homology. For simplicity the emphasis is placed more on parsiomony than on sequence homology in the present study, though both are certainly important. Because parsimony alone will sometimes generate plural candidate trees, the method retains not one but five candidates from which one can then single out the final tree taking other criteria into account.

The properties and performance of the method are then examined by simulating an evolving gene along a model phylogenetic tree. The estimated trees are found to lie in a narrow range of the parsimony criteria used in the present study. Thus, other criteria such as biological evidence and likelihood are necessary to single out the correct tree among them, with biological evidence taking precedence over any other criterion. The computer simulation also reveals that the method satisfactorily estimates both tree topology and ancestral sequences, at least for the evolutionary model used in the present study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aoki K, Tateno Y, Takahata N (1981) Estimating evolutionary distance from restriction maps of mitochondrial DNA with arbitrary G+C content. J Mol Evol 18:1–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Camin JH, Sokal RR (1965) A method for deducing branching sequences in phylogeny. Evolution 19:311–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli-Sforza LL, Edwards AWF (1967) Phylogenetic analysis models and estimation procedures. Am J Hum Genet 19: 233–257

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eck RV, Dayhoff MO (1966) Algorithm for constructing ancestral sequences and a phylogenetic tree. In: Eck, RV, Dayhoff MO (eds) Atlas of protein sequence and structure. National Biomedical Research Foundation, Silver Spring MD, pp 164–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Farris JS (1972) Estimating phylogenetic trees from distance matrices. Am Nat 106:645–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein J (1981) Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 17:368–376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein J (1982) Numerical methods for inferring evolutionary trees. Q Rev Biol 57:379–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitch WM (1971) Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst Zool 20: 406–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitch WM (1977) On the problem of discovering the most parsimonious tree. Am Nat 111:223–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitch WM, Margoliash E (1967) Construction of phylogenetic trees. Science 155:279–284

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gojobori T, Yokoyama S (1985) Rates of evolution of the retroviral oncogene of Moloney murine sarcoma virus and of its cellular homologues. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:4198–4201

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holmquist R (1979) The method of parsimony: an experimental test and theoretical analysis of the adequacy of molecular restoration studies. J Mol Biol 135:939–958

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jukes TH, Cantor CR (1969) Evolution of protein molecules. In: Munro HN (ed) Mammalian protein metabolism. Academic Press, New York, pp 21–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura M (1968) Evolutionary rate at the molecular level. Nature 217:624–626

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16:111–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura M (1981) Doubt about studies of globin evolution based on maximum parsimony codons and the augmentation procedure. J Mol Evol 17:121–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura M (1983) The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyata T, Yasunaga T (1981) Molecular evolution of mRNA: a method for estimating evolutionary rates of synonymous and amino acid substitutions from homologous nucleotide sequences and its application. J Mol Evol 16:23–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyata T, Yasunaga T, Nishida T (1980) Nucleotide sequence divergence and functional constraint in mRNA evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77:7328–7332

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moore GW (1976) Proof for the maximum parsimony (“Red King”) algorithm. In: Goodman M, Tashian RE (eds) Molecular anthropology. Plenum Press, New York, pp 117–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore GW, Goodman M, Barnabas J (1973) An iterative approach from the standpoint of the additive hypothesis to the dendrogram problem posed by molecular data set. J Theor Biol 38:423–457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murata M, Richardson JS, Sussman JL (1985) Simultaneous comparison of three protein sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:3073–3077

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nei M (1975) Molecular population genetics and evolution. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei M (1987) Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei M, Stephens JC, Saitou N (1985) Methods for computing the standard errors of branching points in an evolutionary tree and their application to molecular data from humans and apes. Mol Biol Evol 2:66–85

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson DF, Foulds LR (1981) Comparison of phylogenetic trees. Math Biosci 53:131–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saitou N, Nei M (1986) The number of nucleotides required to determine the branching order of three species, with special reference to the human-chimpanzee-gorilla divergence. J Mol Evol 24:189–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sneath PHA, Sokal RR (1973) Numerical taxonomy. Freeman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Michener CD (1958) A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationship. Univ Kansas Sci Bull 38:1409–1438

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Sneath PHA (1963) Principles of numerical taxonomy. Freeman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahata N, Kimura M (1981) A model of evolutionary base substitutions and its application with special reference to rapid change of pseudogenes. Genetics 98:641–657

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tateno Y, Nei M (1978) Goodman et al.'s method for augmenting the number of nucleotide substitutions. J Mol Evol 11:67–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tateno Y, Nei M, Tajima F (1982) Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. I. Distantly related species. J Mol Evol 18:387–404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor WR (1988) A flexible method to align large numbers of biological sequences. J Mol Evol 24:161–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Yokoyama S, Gojobori T (1987) Molecular evolution and phylogeny of the human AIDS viruses, LAV, HTLV-III and ARV. J Mol Evol 24:330–336

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tateno, Y. A method for molecular phylogeny construction by direct use of nucleotide sequence data. J Mol Evol 30, 85–93 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02102455

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02102455

Key words

Navigation