Abstract
Various conceptual schemes have been employed to make sense of the diverse policy literature. Attempting to understand policy analysis in terms of its political and historical significance, this essay points to three distinct “faces,” distinguished with regard to differing relationships between knowledge and politcs: one where knowledge purports to replace politics, one where politics masquerades as knowledge, and one where knowledge and politics attain a measure of reconciliation. Historically, these three faces may be viewed, to an extent, as periods in the development of policy analysis: from positivism, to its critique, to present post-positivist efforts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abele, Frances (1983). “The Berger Inquiry and the politics of transformation in the Mackenzie Valley,” Ph.D. Thesis, York University. Toronto.
Amy, Douglas J. (1983). “Environmental mediation: An alternative approach to policy stalemates,”Policy Sciences 15: 345–365.
Amy, Douglas J. (1984). “Toward a post-positivist policy analysis,”Policy Studies Journal 13: 207–211.
Apel, Karl-Otto (1978). “The conflicts of our time and the problem of political ethics,” in Fred R. Dallmayr (ed.),From Contract to Community. New York: Marcel Dekker, pp. 81–101.
Apel, Karl-Otto (1979). “Types of rationality today: The continuum of reason between science and ethics,” in Theodore F. Geraets (ed.),Rationality Today. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, pp. 307–340.
Arendt, Hannah (1958).The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Arnstein, Sherry R. (1969). “A ladder of citizen participation,”Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35: 216–224.
Aron, Raymond (1968). “Auguste Comte.” In hisMain Currents in Sociological Thought, Vol. 1. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books, pp. 73–143.
Aucoin, Peter (1979). “Public-Policy Theory and Analysis,” in G. Bruce Doern and Peter Aucoin (eds.),Public Policy in Canada: Organization, Process and Management. Toronto: Macmillan of Canada, pp. 1–26.
Avineri, Shlomo (1971).The Social and Political Thought of Karl Marx. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ayer, A. J. (1952).Language, Truth and Logic. New York: Dover Publications, 2nd ed.
Bardes, Barbara A., and Dubnick, Melvin J. (1980). “Motives and methods in policy analysis,” in Stuart S. Nagel (ed.),Improving Policy Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 101–127.
Baum, Howell S. (1982). “Policy analysis: Special cognitive style needed,”Administration and Society 14: 213–236.
Beneviste, Guy (1977).The Politics of Expertise. San Francisco: Boyd and Fraser, 2nd ed.
Berger, Peter L., and Neuhaus, Richard John (1977).To Empower People: The Role of Mediating Structures in Public Policy. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
Berger, Thomas R. (1977).Northern Frontier, Northern Homeland: The Report of the Mackenzie Valley Pipeline Inquiry, Vols. 1–2. Ottawa: Supply and Services Canada.
Bernstein, Richard J. (1976).The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Bolland, John M., and Muth, Rodney (1984). “The decision seminar: A new approach to urban problem solving,”Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 6: 75–88.
Bregha, François (1979).Bob Blair's Pipeline: The Business and Politics of Northern Energy Development Projects. Toronto: James Lorimer.
Brown, Peter G. (1976). “Ethics and policy research,”Policy Analysis 2: 225–240.
Bryden, Kenneth (1982). “Public input into policy-making and administration: The present situation and some requirements for the future,”Canadian Public Administration 25: 81–107.
Cassirer, Ernst (1951).The Philosophy of the Enlightenment. Fritz C. C. Koelin and James P. Pettegrove (tr.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Churchman, C. West (1979).The Systems Approach. New York: Dell Publishing, rev. ed.
Cicourel, Aaron V. (1964).Method and Measurement in Sociology. New York: The Free Press.
Comte, Auguste (1974). “Plan for scientific operations necessary for reorganizing society,” in Richard Fletcher (ed.),The Crisis of Industrial Civilization: The Early Essays of Auguste Comte. London: Heinemann Educational Books, pp. 11–181.
Dallmayr, Fred R. (1980–81). “Critical Theory and Public Policy,”Policy Studies Journal 9: 522–534.
Doern, G. Bruce (1977). “The policy-making philosophy of Prime Minister Trudeau and his advisers,” in Thomas A. Hockin (ed.),Apex of Power: The Prime Minister and Political Leadership in Canada. Scarborough, Ont.: Prentice-Hall of Canada, 2nd ed., pp. 189–196.
Dryzek, John (1982). “Policy analysis as a hermeneutic activity,”Policy Sciences 14: 309–329.
Dye, Thomas R. (1975).Understanding Public Policy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2nd ed.
Easton, David (1971).The Political System: An Inquiry into the State of Political Science. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2nd ed.
Elkin, Stephen L. (1985). “Regulation as a Political Question,”Policy Sciences 18: 95–108.
Engels, Frederick (1978).Socialism: Utopian and Scientific. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
Fay, Brian (1975).Social Theory and Political Practice. London: George Allen and Unwin.
Fischer, Frank (1980).Politics, Values and Public Policy: The Problem of Methodology. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
French, Richard D. (1984).How Ottawa Decides: Planning and Industrial Policy Making 1969–1984. Toronto: James Lorimer, 2nd ed.
Gambel, D.J. (1979). “The Berger Inquiry: An impact assessment process,”Science 199: 946–952.
Gay, Peter (1966, 1969).The Enlightenment: An Interpretation, Vols. 1–2. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Giddens, Anthony (1977). “Positivism and its critics.” In hisStudies in Social and Political Theory. New York: Basic Books, pp. 29–89.
Gunnell, John G. (1975).Philosophy, Science and Political Inquiry. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
Gunnell, John G. (1976). “Social scientific knowledge and policy decisions: A critique of the intellectualist model,” in Phillip M. Gregg (ed.),Problems of Theory in Policy Analysis. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, pp. 29–49.
Haber, Samuel (1964).Efficiency and Uplift: Scientific Management in the Progressive Era 1890–1920. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Habermas, Jürgen (1971a).Knowledge and Human Interests. Jeremy J. Shapiro (tr.). Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, Jürgen (1971b).Toward a Rational Society. Jeremy J. Shapiro (tr.). Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, Jürgen (1974)Theory and Practice. John Viertel (tr.). Boston: Beacon Press.
Hart, Henry M., Jr., and McNaughton, John T. (1958). “Evidence and Inference in the Law,”Daedalus 87: 40–64.
Hartle, Douglas G. (1976a). “Techniques and processes of administration,”Canadian Public Administration 19: 21–33.
Hartle, Douglas G. (1976b).A Theory of the Expenditure Budgetary Process. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Hartle, Douglas G. (1978).The Expenditure Budget Process in the Government of Canada. Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation.
Heclo, Hugh (1972). “Review article: Policy analysis,”British Journal of Political Science 2: 83–108.
Helmer, Olaf (1966).Social Technology. New York: Basic Books.
Horkheimer, Max (1974).Eclipse of Reason. New York: Seabury Press.
Horkheimer, Max, and Adorno, Theodor W. (1972).Dialectic of Enlightenment. John Cumming (tr.). New York: Seabury Press.
Horowitz, Irving Louis (1970). “Social science mandarins: Policymaking as a political formula,”Policy Sciences 1: 339–360.
Kariel, Henry S. (1966).The Promise of Politics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kariel, Henry S. (1969).Open Systems: Arenas for Political Action. Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock Publishers.
Kariel, Henry S. (1972). “Commentary on Lane's paper,” in James C. Charlesworth (ed.),Integration of the Social Sciences through Policy Analysis. Philadelphia: American Academy of Political and Social Science.
Kaufmann, Walter (1966).Hegel: A Reinterpretation. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
Kennedy, James (1978). Letter-to-the-editor,Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2: 383.
Kettler, David,et al. (1984).Karl Mannheim. London: Tavistock Publications/Chichester: Ellis Horwood.
Kolakowski, Leszek (1968).The Alienation of Reason: A History of Positivist Thought. Norbert Guterman (tr.). Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Koontz, Harold (1961). “The management theory jungle,”Academy of Management Journal 4: 174–188.
Kramer, Fred A. (1977). “Policy analysis as ideology,” in Fred A. Kramer (ed.),Perspectives on Public Bureaucracy. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop Publishers, 2nd ed., pp. 203–220.
Lasswell, Harold D. (1951). “The policy orientation,” in Daniel Lerner and Harold D. Lasswell (eds.),The Policy Sciences: Recent Developments in Scope and Method. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 3–15.
Lasswell, Harold D. (1958). “Clarifying value judgment: Principles of content and procedure,”Inquiry 1: 87–98.
Lasswell, Harold D. (1962). “The public interest: Proposing principles of content and procedure,” in Carl J. Friedrich (ed.),The Public Interest. New York: Atherton Press, pp. 54–79.
Lasswell, Harold D. (1965).World Politics and Personal Insecurity. New York: The Free Press.
Lasswell, Harold D. (1970). “The emerging conception of policy sciences,”Policy Sciences 1: 3–14.
Lasswell, Harold D. (1971).A Pre-View of Policy Sciences. New York: American Elsevier Publishing.
Lasswell, Harold D. (1974). “Some perplexities of policy theory,”Social Research 14: 176–189.
Lovins, Amory B. (1977). “Cost-risk-benefit assessments in energy policy,”George Washington Law Review 45: 911–943.
Macpherson, C. B. (1977).The Life and Times of Liberal Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
MacRae, Duncan, Jr. (1976). “Technical communities and political choice,”Minerva 14: 169–190.
Majone, Giandomenico (1977). “Technology assessment and policy analysis,”Policy Sciences 8: 173–175.
Majone, Giandomenico (1982). “Reforming standard-setting,”Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 2: 285–290.
Mannheim, Karl (1936).Ideology and Utopia: An Introduction to the Sociology of Knowledge. Louis Wirth and Edward Shils (trs.). New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
Mannheim, Karl (1940).Man and Society in an Age of Reconstruction. Edward Shils (tr.). New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
Mazur, Allan (1977). “Science courts,”Minerva 15: 1–14.
McAdams, John (1984). “The anti-policy analysts,”Policy Studies Journal 13: 91–101.
McCarthy, Thomas (1978).The Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Muth, Rodney, and Bolland, John M. (1981). “The social planetarium: Toward a revitalized civic order,”The Urban Interest 3: 13–25.
Nagel, Stuart S. (1980). “Introduction: policy analysis research, what it is and where it is going,” in Stuart S. Nagel (ed.),Improving Policy Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 7–13.
Nash, Christopher,et al. (1975). “Criteria for evaluating project evaluation techniques,”Journal of the American Institute of Planners 41: 83–90.
Oakeshott, Michael (1962). “Political education,” in hisRationalism in Politics and Other Essays. London: Methuen, pp. 111–136.
Oppenheim, Felix E. (1968).Moral Principles in Political Philosophy. New York: Random House.
Orr, David W. (1979). “U.S. energy policy and the political economy of participation,”Journal of Politics 41: 1027–1056.
Pateman, Carole (1970).Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Paris, David C., and Reynolds, James F. (1983).The Logic of Policy Inquiry. New York: Longman.
Rivlin, Alice M. (1971).Systematic Thinking for Social Action. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
Saint-Simon, Henri (1952).Selected Writings. Felix Markham (tr.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Salter, Liora, and Slaco, Debra (1981).Public Inquiries in Canada. Ottawa: Science Council of Canada, Background Study 47.
Schoettle, Enid Curtis Bok (1968). “The state of the art in policy studies,” in Raymond A. Bauer and Kenneth L. Gergen (eds.),The Study of Policy Formation. New York: The Free Press, pp. 149–179.
Schick, Allen (1969). “Systems politics and systems budgeting,”Public Administration Review 29: 137–151.
Schick, Allen (1971). “Toward the cybernetic state,” in Dwight Waldo (ed.),Public Administration in a Time of Turbulence. New York: Chandler Publishing, pp. 214–233.
Self, Peter (1975).Econocrats and the Policy Process: The Politics and Philosophy of Cost-Benefit Analysis. London: Macmillan Press.
Stabler, J.C. (1977). “The report of the Mackenzie Valley Pipeline Inquiry, volume 1: A socio-economic critique,”The Musk-Ox: A Journal of the North 20: 57–58.
Stewart, Thomas R.,et al. (1984). “Citizen participation and judgment in policy analysis: A case study of urban air quality policy,”Policy Sciences 17: 67–87.
Strauss, Leo (1975). “What is political philosophy?” in hisPolitical Philosophy: Six Essays by Leo Strauss. Hilail Gildin (ed.). Indianapolis: Pegasus.
Taylor, Charles (1971). “Interpretation and the sciences of man,”Review of Metaphysics 25: 3–51.
Taylor, Charles (1973). “Neutrality in political science,” in Alan Ryan (ed.),The Philosophy of Social Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 139–170.
Torgerson, Douglas (1980).Industrialization and Assessment: Social Impact Assessment as a Social Phenomenon. Toronto: York University Publications in Northern Studies.
Torgerson, Douglas (1981). “SIA as a social phenomenon: The problem of contextuality,” in Frank J. Tester and William Mykes (eds.),Social Impact Assessment: Theory, Method and Practice. Calgary: Detselig Enterprises, pp. 66–92.
Torgerson, Douglas (1984). “The communicative context of policy analysis: The problem of strategic interaction in the policy process,” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Toronto. Toronto.
Torgerson, Douglas (1985). “Contextual orientation in policy analysis: The contribution of Harold D. Lasswell,”Policy Sciences 18: 241–261.
Tribe, Laurence H. (1972). “Policy science: Analysis or ideology?”Philosophy and Public Affairs 2: 66–110.
Tribe, Laurence H. (1972–73). “Technology assessment and the fourth discontinuity: The limits of instrumental rationality,”Southern California Law Review 46: 617–660.
van Gunsteren, Herman R. (1976).The Quest for Control: A Critique of the Rational-Central-Rule Approach in Public Affairs. London; John Wiley and Sons.
Waldo, Dwight (1948).The Administrative State: A Study of the Political Theory of American Public Administration. New York: The Ronald Press.
Weinberg, Alvin M. (1972). “Science and trans-science,”Minerva 10: 209–222.
Weller, Phil, and Jackson, John (1982). “Lessons in the need for public participation,”Alternatives 10 (2/3): 5–8.
White, Jay D. (1982). “Public policy analysis: Reason, method, and praxis,” D.P.A. Thesis, George Washington University. Washington, D.C.
Wildavsky, Aaron (1966). “The political economy of efficiency: Cost-benefit analysis, systems analysis, and program budgeting,”Public Administration Review 26: 292–310.
Wildavsky, Aaron (1979).Speaking Truth to Power: The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis. Boston: Little, Brown.
Wolin, Sheldon S. (1960).Politics and Vision: Continuity and Innovation in Western Political Thought. Boston: Little, Brown.
Wolin, Sheldon S. (1969). “Political theory as a vocation,”American Political Science Review 63: 1062–1082.
Zamyatin, Yevgeny (1972).We. Mirra Ginsburg (tr.). New York: Bantam Books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Torgerson, D. Between knowledge and politics: Three faces of policy analysis. Policy Sci 19, 33–59 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02124483
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02124483