Skip to main content
Log in

Control of a chaotic system

  • Published:
Dynamics and Control

Abstract

The Lorenz equations are well known for their ability to produce chaotic motion. We investigate here the Lorenz system subject to a control input. Two different controllers are the designed for this system, one based on linear methods and one based on nonlinear methods. The objective of the controller is to drive the system to one of the unstable equilibrium points associated with uncontrolled chaotic motion. Each controller is able to produce stable motion. However, the character of this motion may differ considerably, depending on adjustment of “gains” used in the controller. In particular, the motion may contain chaotic transients. It is possible to create a system with intermediate-term-senstive dependence on initial conditions, but with no such long-term dependence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • J. Brindley and I. M. Motoz, “Lorenz attractor behavior in a continuously stratified baroclinic fluid,”Phys. Lett., vol. 77A, pp. 441–444, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Ehrhard and U. Müller, “Dynamical behavior of natural convection in a single-phase loop,”J. Fluid Mech. (in press).

  • J.E. Gayek and T.L. Vincent, “On the asymptotic stability of boundary trajectories,”Int. J. Control, vol. 41, pp. 1077–1086, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.D. Gibbon and M.J. McGuinness, “A derivation of the Lorenz equation for some unstable dispersive physical systems,”Phys. Lett., vol. 77A, pp 295–299, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • W.J. Grantham and T.L. Vincent, “A controllability minimum principle.”J. Optimization Theory Applications, vol. 17, pp. 93–114, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Haken, “Analogy between higher instabilities in fluids and lasers,”Phys. Lett., vol. 53A, pp. 77–78, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.L. Kaplan and J.A. Yorke, “Preturbulence: a regime observed in a fluid flow model of Lorenz,”Commun. Math. Phys., vol. 67, pp. 93–108, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Knobloch, “Chaos in a segmented disc dynamo,”Phys Lett., vol. 82A, pp. 439–440, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • E.N. Lorenz, “Deterministic non-periodic flow,”J. Atmos. Sci., vol. 20, pp. 130–141, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • M.V.R. Malkus, “Non-peroidic convection at high and low Prandtl number,”Mémoires Société Royale des Sciences de Liége, Series 6, vol. 4, pp. 125–128, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Pedlosky, “Limit cycles and unstable baroclinic waves,”J. Atmos. Sci., vol. 29, p. 53, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Pedlosky and C. Frenzen, “Chaotic and periodic behavior of finite amplitude baroclinic waves,”J. Atmos. Sci., vol. 37, pp. 1177–1196, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Sparrow, “The Lorenz equations: bifurcations, chaos, and strange attractor,”Appl. Math. Sci., vol. 41, 1982.

  • E.D. Yorke and J.A. Yorke, “Metastable chaos: transition to sustained chaotic behavior in the Lorenz model,”J. Stat. Phys., vol. 21, pp. 263–277, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Recommended by W.J. Grantham

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vincent, T.L., Yu, J. Control of a chaotic system. Dynamics and Control 1, 35–52 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02169423

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02169423

Keywords

Navigation