Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Interpersonal deception: III. Effects of deceit on perceived communication and nonverbal behavior dynamics

  • Published:
Journal of Nonverbal Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Much past research on deception has examined it individually and noninteractively. Here we argue for broadening our understanding of deception by examining it as a dyadic and interactive event. Assumptions of an interpersonal perspective, articulated in Interpersonal Deception Theory, are advanced. These include recognizing the agency of both parties to interpersonal exchanges, examining such exchanges at multiple levels, incorporating measures of communicationrelated perceptions and interpretations as well as behaviors, recognizing that behaviors may be strategic as well as nonstrategic, and viewing such behavior as dynamic rather than static. An experiment reflecting this orientation is presented in which pairs of participants, half friends and half strangers, conducted interviews during which interviewees (EEs) either lied or told the truth to interviewers (ERs) who were induced to be highly, moderately, or not suspicious. Dependent measures included participant (EE and ER) perceptions, interpretations, and evaluations of EE behaviors and trained coders' ratings of actual nonverbal behaviors. Consistent with the theory, deceivers were more uncertain and vague, more nonimmediate and reticent, showed more negative affect, displayed more arousal and non-composure, and generally made a poorer impression than truthtellers. Their behaviors also connoted greater formality and submissiveness. Also consistent with the theory's premise that deceptive interactions are dynamic, deceivers' kinesic relaxation and pleasantness changed over time, in line with a behavior and image management interpretation, and degree of reciprocity between EE and ER nonverbal behaviors was affected by the presence of deception and suspicion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen, P. A. (1985). Nonverbal immediacy in interpersonal communication. In A. W. Siegman & S. Feldstein (Eds.),Multichannel integrations of nonverbal behavior (pp. 1–36). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyle, M. (1972). Non-verbal communication in human social interaction. In R. A. Hinde (Ed.),Non-verbal communication (pp. 243–269). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bavelas, J. B., Black, A., Chovil, N., & Mullett, J. (1990).Equivocal communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, C. R. (in press). A plan-based approach to strategic communication. In D. E. Hewes (Ed.),Cognitive bases of interpersonal communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • Bernieri, F. J., & Rosenthal, R. (1991). Interpersonal coordination: Behavior matching and Interactional synchrony. In R. S. Feldman & B. Rimé (Eds.),Fundamentals of nonverbal behavior (pp. 401–432). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, C. F., Jr., Omar, A., Pitre, U., Lashley, B. R., Skaggs, L. M., & Kirk, C. T. (1992). Fishy-looking liars: Deception judgment from expectancy-violation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 969–977.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buller, D. B. (1988, November).Deception by strangers, friends, and intimates: Attributional biases due to relationship development. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the Speech-Communication Association, Boston.

  • Buller, D. B., & Aune, R. K. (1987). Nonverbal cues to deception among intimates, friends, and strangers.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 11, 269–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buller, D. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1993).Interpersonal deception theory. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Buller, D. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1994). Deception. In J. A. Daly & J. M. Wiemann (Eds.),Communicating strategically: Strategies in interpersonal communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buller, D. B., Burgoon, J. K., Buslig, A., & Roiger, J. (1993).The language of interpersonal deception. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Buller, D. B., Comstock, J., Aune, R. K., & Strzyzewski, K. (1989). The effect of probing on deceivers and truthtellers.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 13, 155–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buller, D. B., & Hunsaker, F. (1992).Conversing is believing: Suspicion and the truth-bias of conversational participants. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Buller, D. B., Strzyzewski, K. D., & Comstock, J. (1991). Interpersonal deception: I. Deceivers' reactions to receivers' suspicions and probing.Communication Monographs, 58, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buller, D. B., Strzyzewski, K. D., & Hunsaker, F. (1991). Interpersonal deception: II. The inferiority of conversational participants as deception detectors.Communication Monographs, 58, 25–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buller, D. B., & Walther, J. B. (1989, February).Deception in established relationships: Application of schema theory. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the Western States Communication Association, Spokane, WA.

  • Burgoon, J. K. (1989, May).Toward a processual view of interpersonal deception. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, San Francisco.

  • Burgoon, J. K. (1991). Relational message interpretation of touch, conversational distance, and posture.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 15, 233–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J. K. (1992, November).Applying an interpersonal communication perspective to deception: Effects of suspicion, deceit, and relational familiarity on perceived communication. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Chicago.

  • Burgoon, J. K. (1993). Interpersonal expectations, expectancy violations, and emotional communication.Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 12, 30–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J. K., Buller, D. B., & Woodall, G. W. (1989).Nonverbal communication: The unspoken dialogue. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J. K., Buller, D. B., Dillman, L., & Walther, J. B. (1993).Interpersonal deception: IV. Effects of suspicion on perceived suspicion and nonverbal behavior dynamics. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Burgoon, J. K., Dillman, L., Stern, L. A., & Kelley, D. L. (1992, May).Reciprocity and compensation patterns in dyadic interaction: II. Statistical analysis. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Miami.

  • Burgoon, J. K., & Hale, J. L. (1984). The fundamental topoi of relational communication.Communication Monographs, 51, 193–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J. K., & Hale, J. L. (1987). Validation and measurement of the fundamental themes of relational communication.Communication Monographs, 54, 19–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J. K., Le Poire, B. A., & Rosenthal, R. (1992).Matching and compensatory patterns associated with pre-interaction expectancies and actual communication behavior. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Chicago.

  • Burgoon, J. K., & Newton, D. A. (1991). Applying a social meaning model to relational messages of conversational involvement: Comparing participant and observer perspectives.Southern Communication Journal, 56, 96–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J. K., & Saine, T. J. (1978).The unspoken dialogue: An introduction to nonverbal communication. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J. K., & Walther, J. B. (1990). Nonverbal expectancies and the evaluative consequences of violations.Human Communication Research, 17, 232–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappella, J. N. (1985). The management of conversations. In M. L. Knapp & G. R. Miller (Eds.),Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 393–438). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coker, D. A., & Burgoon, J. K. (1987). The nature of conversational involvement and nonverbal encoding patterns.Human Communication Research, 13, 463–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B. M., Kirkendol, S. E. (1989). The motivational impairment effect in the communication of deception. In J. C. Yuille (Ed.),Credibility assessment. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B. M., Kirkendol, S. E., Tang, J., & O'Brien, T. P. (1988). The motivational impairment effect in the communication of deception: Replications and extensions.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 12, 177–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B. M., Lanier, K., & Davis, T. (1983). Detecting the deceit of the motivated liar.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1096–1103.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B. M., Stone, J. I., & Lassiter, G. D. (1985). Deceiving and detecting deceit. In B. R. Schlenker (Ed.), Theself and social life (pp. 323–370). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • deTurck, M. A., & Miller, G. R. (1985). Deception and arousal: Isolating the behavioral correlates of deception.Human Communication Research, 12, 181–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. (1988). Lying and nonverbal behavior: Theoretical isues and new findings.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 12, 163–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1969a). Nonverbal leakage and clues to deception.Psychiatry, 1, 88–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1969b). The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, usage, and codings.Semiotica, 1, 49–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1959).Presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, P. (1989).Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, J. L., & Burgoon, J. K. (1984). Models of reactions to changes in nonverbal immediacy.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 8, 287–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellermann, K. (1992). Communication: Inherently strategic and primarily automatic.Communication Monographs, 59, 288–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, M. L., Cody, M. J., & Reardon, K. K. (1987). Nonverbal signals. In C. R. Berger & S. H. Chaffee (Eds.),Handbook of communication science (pp. 385–418). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, M. L., Hart, R. P., & Dennis, H. S. (1974). An exploration of deception as a communication construct.Human Communication Research, 1, 15–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, R. E. (1978). Verbal and nonverbal cues in the perception of lying.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 380–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, R. E., & Poe, D. (1980). On the line: The deception judgements of customs inspectors and laymen.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 784–798.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClintock, C. C., & Hunt, R. G. (1975). Nonverbal indicators of affect and deception in an interview setting.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 5, 54–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCroskey, J. C. (1972).An introduction to rhetorical communication (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCroskey, J. C., Larson, C. E., & Knapp, M. L. (1971).An introduction to interpersonal communication. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. R., & Burgoon, J. K. (1982). Factors affecting witness credibility. In N. L. Kerr & R. M. Bray (Eds.),The psychology of the courtroom (pp. 169–194). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, D. A., & Burgoon, J. K. (1990). Nonverbal conflict behaviors: Functions, strategies, and tactics. In D. D. Cahn (Ed.),Intimates in conflict: A communication perspective (pp. 77–104). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Hair, H. D., Cody, M. J., & McLaughlin, M. L. (1981). Prepared lies, spontaneous lies, Machiavellianism, and nonverbal communication.Human Communication Research, 7, 325–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Hair, H. D., Cody, M. J., Goss, B., & Krayer, K. J. (1988). The effect of gender, deceit orientation and communicator style on macro-assessments of honesty.Communication Quarterly, 36, 77–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Hair, H. D., Cody, M. J., Wang, X-T., & Chao, E. Y. (1990). Vocal stress and deception detection among Chinese.Communication Quarterly, 38, 158–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, M. T., & Simmons, K. B. (1993, November).Interpersonal intentions, nonverbal behaviors and judgments of liking: Encoding, decoding, and consciousness. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Miami.

  • Patterson, M. L. (1983).Nonverbal behavior: A functional perspective. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, M. L. (1987). Presentational and affect-management functions of nonverbal involvement.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 11, 110–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toris, C., & DePaulo, B. M. (1985). Effects of actual deception and suspiciousness of deception on interpersonal perceptions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1063–1073.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrij, A., & Winkel, F. W. (1991). Cultural patterns in Dutch and Surinam nonverbal behavior: An analysis of simulated police/citizen encounters.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 15, 169–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, J., & Weinstein, E. (1972). Honesty, fabrication, and the enhancement of credibility.Sociometry, 35, 316–331.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B. M., & Rosenthal, R. (1981). Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 2–59). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., & Driver, R. E. (1985). Telling lies: Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. In A. W. Siegman & S. Feldstein (Eds.),Multichannel integrations of nonverbal behavior (pp. 129–148). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Communication, University of Arizona, 85721, Tucson, AZ

    Judee K. Burgoon (Professor) & David B. Buller (Associate Professor of Communication)

Authors
  1. Judee K. Burgoon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David B. Buller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Portions of this paper were presented to the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, San Francisco, May 1989. This project was funded by the U.S. Army Research Institute (Contract #MDA903-90-K-0113). The views, opinions, and/or findings in this report are those of the authors and should not be construed as an official Department of the Army position, policy, or decision.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burgoon, J.K., Buller, D.B. Interpersonal deception: III. Effects of deceit on perceived communication and nonverbal behavior dynamics. J Nonverbal Behav 18, 155–184 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02170076

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02170076

Keywords

Search

Navigation