Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Invited article: A parallel process model of nonverbal communication

  • Published:
Journal of Nonverbal Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article develops a parallel processing model of nonverbal communication that emphasizes the interdependence of behavioral and person perception processes from a functional perspective on social interaction. The form and outcome of the behavioral (encoding) and person perception (decoding) processes are a product of three related elements, including: (1) determinants, (2) the social environment, and (3) cognitive-affective mediators. In this model, the determinants (biology, culture, gender, and personality), in combination with the partner and setting, influence interpersonal expectancies, dispositions, goals, affect, and cognitive resources. In turn, these mediators constrain the attention and cognitive effort applied to behavior management and person perception. In general, fewer cognitive resources and decreased effort will have less effect on the outcome of automatic behavioral (e.g., scripts) and person perception (e.g., impressions based on appearance and nonverbal cues) processes than on more demanding ones. The utility of this theory in integrating behavioral and person perception processes into a single system is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abelson, R. P. (1981). The psychological status of the script concept.American Psychologist, 36, 715–729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albright, L., Kenny, D.A., & Malloy, T. E. (1988). Consensus in personality judgments at zero acquaintance.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 387–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alden, L. (1987). Attributional responses of anxious individuals to different patterns of social feedback: Nothing succeeds like improvement.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 100–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alloy, L. B., & Abramson, L. Y. (1988). Depressive realism: Four theoretical perspectives. In L. B. Alloy (Ed.),Cognitive processes in depression. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1992). Thin slices of behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis.Psychological Bulletin, 111, 256–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, P. A., & Andersen, J. F. (1984). The exchange of nonverbal intimacy: A critical review of dyadic models.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 8, 327–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, N. H. (1974). Information integration: A brief survey. In D. H. Krantz, R. C. Atkinson, R. D. Luce, & P. Suppes (Eds.),Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology (pp. 236–305). San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, N. H. (1981). Foundations of information integration theory. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyle, M. & Dean, J. (1965). Eye-contact, distance, and affiliation.Sociometry, 28, 289–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, A. P., & Cheek, J. M. (1986). Shyness, self-preoccupation, and the Stroop color and word test.Personality and Individual Differences, 7, 571–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asch, S. E. 1946). Forming impressions of personality.Journal Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 1230–1240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asendorf, J. B. (1987). Videotape reconstruction of emotions and cognitions related to shyness.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 542–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bargh, J. A. (1989). Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition. In J.S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.),Unintended thought (pp. 3–51). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, R. G. (1968). Ecological psychology:Concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., & Newman, L. S. (1994). Self-regulation of cognitive processes.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bern, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.)Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 1–62). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernieri, F. & Rosenthal, R. (1991). Coordinated movement in human interaction. In R. S. Feldman B. Rime (Eds.),Fundamentals of nonverbal behavior (pp. 410–431). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, D. S., & McArthur, L. Z. (1985). Some components and consequences of a babyface.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 312–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, D. S., & McArthur, L. Z. (1986). Perceiving character in faces: The impact of agerelated craniofacial changes on social perception.Psychological Bulletin, 100, 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, M. H. (1972). Effect of an impression set on subsequent behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 301–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M. B. (1988). A dual process model of impression formation. In T. K. Srull & R. S. Wyer, Jr. (Eds.),Advances in social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 1–36). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J. K. (1978). A communication model of personal space violations: Explication and an initial test.Human Communication Research, 4, 129–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J. K., Buller, D. B., & Woodall, W. G. (1989).Nonverbal communication: The unspoken dialogue. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J. K., Dillman, L., & Stern, L. A. (1993). Adaptation in dyadic interaction: Defining and operationalizing patterns of reciprocity and compensation.Communication Theory, 3, 295–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D. (1971).The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., Glass, C. R., & Merluzzi, T. V. (1979). Self-statements and self-evaluations: A cognitive-response analysis of heterosocial anxiety.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 3, 249–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. D., & Fehr, B. (1990). Self-esteem and perceptions of conveyed impressions: Is negative affectivity associated with greater realism?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 122–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappella, J. N. (1981). Mutual influence in expressive behavior: Adult-adult and infant-adult dyadic interaction.Psychological Bulletin, 89, 101–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappella, J. N., & Greene, J. O. (1982). A discrepancy-arousal explanation of mutual influence in expressive behavior for adult-adult and infant-infant dyadic interaction.Communication Monographs, 49, 89–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, S. (1978). Behavioral correlates of social anxiety.British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17, 117–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darley, J. M., & Fazio, R. (1980). Expectancy confirmation processes arising in the social interaction sequence.American Psychologist, 35, 867–881.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B., Kenny, D. A., Hoover, C., Webb, W., & Oliver, P. V. (1987). Accuracy in person perception: Do people know what kinds of impressions they convey?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 303–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. & Friesen, W. V. (1969). The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, usage, and coding.Semiotica, 1, 49–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T. (1992). Thinking is for doing: Portraits of social cognition from daguerreotype to laserphoto.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 877–889.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from categorybased to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention interpretation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1 -74). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991).Social cognition. New York: McGraw-Hill. Fridlund, A. J. (1991). Evolution and facial action in reflex, social motive, and paralanguage.Biological Psychology, 32, 3–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fridlund, A. J. (1994).Human facial expression: An evolutionary view. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funder, D. C. (1987). Errors and mistakes: Evaluating the accuracy of social judgment.Psychological Bulletin, 101, 75–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, D. T., & Jones, E. E. (1986). Perceiver-induced constraint: Interpretations of self-generated reality.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 269–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, D. T., & Krull, D. S. (1988). Seeing less and knowing more: The benefits of perceptual ignorance.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 193–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, D. T., Pelham, B. W., & Krull, D. S. (1988). On cognitive busyness: When person perceivers meet persons perceived.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 733–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. O., & Sparks, G. G. (1983). Explication and test of a cognitive model of communication apprehension: A new look at an old construct.Human Communication Research, 9, 349–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E. T. (1966).The hidden dimension. New York: Doubleday, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. A. (1984).Nonverbal sex differences: Communication accuracy and expressive style. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R. F. (1973). Nonverbal communication. In I. S. Pool, W. Schramm, N. Maccoby, F. Fry, E. Parker, & J. L. Fern (Eds.),Handbook of communication. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T., & Sorrentino, R. M. (Eds.). (1990).Handbook of motivational and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 2). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, M. S., & Revelle, W. (1984). Personality, motivation, and performance: A theory of the relationship between individual differences and information processing.Psychological Review, 91, 153–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ickes, W., Patterson, M. L., Rajecki, D. W., & Tanford, S. (1982). Behavioral and cognitive consequences of reciprocal versus compensatory responses to pre-interaction expectancies.Social Cognition, 1, 160–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ickes, W., Robertson, E., Tooke, W., & Teng, G. (1986). Naturalistic social cognition: Methodology, assessment, and validation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 66–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, R. E., Cruet, D., Johnson, B. R., & Wisnicki, K. S. (1988). Self-focused attention, gender, gender role, and vulnerability to negative affect.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 967–978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A. M. (1984). Toward understanding the role of affect in cognition. In R. S. Wyer, Jr., & T. K. Srull(Eds.),Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 3, pp. 179–236). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1983).The principles of psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Originally published, 1890).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jussim, L. (1991). Social perception and social reality: A reflection-construction model.Psychological Review, 98, 54–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, C. F. (1985). Human dominance signals: The primate in us. In S. L. Ellyson & J. F. Dovidio (Eds.),Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior (pp. 89–108). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellerman, K., & Lim, T. (1990). The conversation MOP: III. Timing of scenes in discourse.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1163–1179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. A. (1991). A general model of consensus and accuracy in interpersonal perception.Psychological Review, 98, 155–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. A., & Albright, L. (1987). Accuracy in interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis.Psychological Bulletin, 102, 390–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. A., & DePaulo, B. M. (1993). Do people know how others view them? An empirical and theoretical account.Psychological Bulletin, 114, 145–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. A., Horner, C., Kashy, D. A., & Chu, L. (1992). Consensus at zero acquaintance: Replication, behavioral cues, and stability.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 88–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruglanski, A. W. (1989). The psychology of being “right”: The problem of accuracy in social perception and cognition.Psychological Bulletin, 106, 395–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krull, D. S. (1993). Does the grist change the mill? The effect of the perceiver's inferential goal on the process of social inference.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletion, 19, 340–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, E. J. (1989).Mindfulness. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leary, M. R. (1983).Understanding social anxiety: Social, personality, and clinical perspectives. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leary, M. R. (1986). The impact of interactional impediments on social anxiety and self-presentation.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 122–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leary, M. R., & Atherton, S. C. (1986). Self-efficacy, social anxiety, and inhibition in inter-personal encounters.Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4, 256–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locher, P., Unger, R., Sociedade, P., & Wahl, J. (1993). At first glance: Accessibility of the physical attractiveness stereotype.Sex Roles, 28, 729–743.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddux, J. E., Norton, L. W., & Leary, M. R. (1988). Cognitive components of social anxiety: An investigation of the integration of self-presentation theory and self-efficacy theory.Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 6, 180–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • McArthur, L. Z., & Baron, R. M. (1983). Toward an ecological theory of social perception.Psychological Review, 90, 215–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian, A. (1969). Some referents and measures of nonverbal behavior.Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 1, 203–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. G. (1984). Culture and the development of everyday social explanation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 961–978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. (1992, June).Distinct systems for “where” and “what”: Reconciling the ecological and representational views of perception. Address at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Society, San Diego.

  • Neuberg, S. L. (1989). The goal of forming accurate impressions during social interactions: Attenuating the impact of negative expectancies.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 374–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, W. T., & Goldberg, L. R. (1966). Raters, ratees, and randomness in personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 681–691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, M. L. (1976). An arousal model of interpersonal intimacy.Psychological Review, 83, 235–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, M. L. (1982a). A sequential functional model of nonverbal exchange.Psychological Review, 89, 231–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, M. L. (1982b). Personality and nonverbal involvement: A functional analysis. In W. Ickes & E. S. Knowles (Eds.),Personality, roles, and social behavior. New York: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, M. L. (1983).Nonverbal behavior: A functional perspective. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, M. L. (1991). A functional approach to nonverbal exchange. In R. S. Feldman B. Rimé (Eds.),Fundamentals of nonverbal behavior (pp. 458–495). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, M. L. (1994a). Interaction behavior and person perception: An integrative approach.Small Group Research, 25, 172–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, M. L. (1994b). Strategic functions of nonverbal exchange. In J. A. Daly & J. M. Wiemann (Eds.),Strategic interpersonal communication (pp. 273–293). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, M. L., Churchill, M. E., Farag, F., & Borden, E. (1991/1992) Impression management, cognitive demand, and interpersonal sensitivity.Current Psychology, 10, 263–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, M. L. & Ritts, V. (1994).Social anxiety: An empirical review and conceptual analysis. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Pilkonis, P. (1977). The behavioral consequences of shyness.Journal of Personality, 45, 596–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. (1966).Experimenter effects in behavioral research. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. (1974).On the social psychology of the self-fulfilling prophecy: Further evidence for pygmalion effects and their mediating mechanisms. New York: M.S.S. Information Corporation Modular Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. A. (1994). Is there a universal recognition of emotion from facial expression? A review of the cross-cultural studies.Psychological Bulletin, 115, 102–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, D. R., & Stephenson, G. M. (1972). Visual interaction in a group of schizophrenic and depressive patients: A follow-up study.British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 11, 57–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R. C. (1982).Dynamic memory: A theory of reminding and learning in computers and people. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977).Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlenker, B. R., & Leary, M. R. (1982). Social anxiety and self-presentation: A conceptualization and modelPsychological Bulletin, 92, 641–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segrin, C. (1990). A meta-analytic review of social skill deficits in depression.Communication Monographs, 57, 292–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. R. (1990). Content and process specificity in the effects of prior experiences. In T. K. Srull & R. S. Wyer, Jr. (Eds.), Advancesin social cognition (Vol. 3, pp. 1–59). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. R., & Zarate, M. A. (1992). Exemplar-based model of social judgment.Psychological Review, 99, 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. B., & Bond, M. H. (1994).Social psychology across cultures: Analysis and perspectives. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, M. (1983). The influence of individuals on situations: Implications for understanding the links between personality and social behavior.Journal of Personality, 51, 497–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, M., & Swann, W. (1978). Behavioral confirmation in social interaction: From social perception to social reality.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 148–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, M. J., & Conway, M. (1989). Negative affect leads to low-effort cognition: Attributional processing for observed social behavior.Social Cognition, 7, 315–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swann, W. B., Jr. (1984). Quest for accuracy in person perception: A matter of pragmatics.Psychological Review, 91, 457–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swann, W., & Snyder, M. (1980). On translating beliefs in action: Theories of ability and their application in an instructional setting.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 879–888.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tickle-Degnen, L. & Rosenthal, R. (1990). The nature of rapport and its correlates.Psychological Inquiry, 1, 285–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tromsdorff, G., & John, G. (1992). Decoding affective communication in intimate relationships.European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 41–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trope, Y. (1986). Identification and inferential processes in dispositional attribution.Psychological Review, 93, 239–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, T. S., & Friedman, H. S. (1993). Sex differences in expressiveness: Emotional expressivenesss, personality, and impressions.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 17, 103–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1987). What do people think they're doing? Action identification and human behavior.Psychological Review, 94, 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D. (1989). Strangers' ratings of the five robust personality factors: Evidence of surprising convergence with self-report.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 120–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1984). Negative affectivity: The disposition to experience aversive emotional states.Psychological Bulletin, 96, 465–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegner, D. M. (1994). Ironic processes of mental control.Psychological Review, 101, 34–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicker, A. W. (1979).An introduction to ecological psychology. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, T. D., & Schooler, J. W. (1991). Thinking too much: Introspection can reduce the quality of preferences and decisions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 181–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J. C., & Dawson, V. L. (1988). Person perception and the bounded rationality of social judgment.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 780–794.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyer, R. S., Jr., & Srull, T. K. (1986). Human cognition in its its social context.Psychological Review, 93, 322–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Missouri-St. Louis, 63121, St. Louis, MO

    Miles L. Patterson

Authors
  1. Miles L. Patterson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Portions of this paper were presented in an address at the annual convention of the American Psychological Society, San Diego, June 1992. I am grateful for the comments of Bill Swann, Mark Knapp, and several anonymous reviewers on earlier versions of this manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Patterson, M.L. Invited article: A parallel process model of nonverbal communication. J Nonverbal Behav 19, 3–29 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02173410

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02173410

Keywords

Search

Navigation