Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ethanol fuels: Energy security, economics, and the environment

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Problems of fuel ethanol production have been the subject of numerous reports, including this analysis. The conclusions are that ethanol: does not improve U.S. energy security; is uneconomical; is not a renewable energy source; and increases environmental degradation. Ethanol production is wasteful of energy resources and does not increase energy security. Considerably more energy, much of it high- grade fossil fuels, is required to produce ethanol than is available in the energy output. About 72% more energy is used to ‘produce a gallon of ethanol than the energy in a gallon of ethanol. Ethanol production from corn is not renewable energy. Its production uses more non- renewable fossil energy resources in growing the corn and in the fermentation/distillation process than is produced as ethanol energy. Ethanol produced from corn and other food crops is also an unreliable and therefore a non-secure source of energy, because of the likelihood of uncontrollable climatic fluctuations, particularly droughts which reduce crop yields. The expected priority for corn and other food crops would be for food and feed. Increasing ethanol production would increase degradation of agricultural land and water and pollute the environment. In U.S. corn production, soil erodes some 18- times faster than soil is reformed, and, where irrigated, corn production mines water faster than recharge of aquifers. Increasing the cost of food and diverting human food resources to the costly and inefficient production of ethanol fuel raise major ethical questions. These occur at a time when more food is needed to meet the basic needs of a rapidly growing world population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Batie, S. 1983.Soil Erosion: Crisis in America's Cropland? Washington, DC: The Conservation Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batty, J.C., and J. Keller. 1980. Energy requirements for irrigation. InHandbook of Energy Utilization in Agriculture, edited by D. Pimentel, pp. 35–44. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, E.H. 1985. The off-site costs of soil erosion.J. Soil Water Conserv. 40:19–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doering, O.C. 1980. Accounting for energy in farm machinery and buildings. InHandbook on Energy Utilization in Agriculture, edited by David Pimentel, pp. 9–14. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dovring, F. 1988.Farming for Fuel. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durning, A.B. 1989.Poverty and the environment: reversing the downward spiral. Worldwatch Paper 92. Washington, DC: Worldwatch Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Energy Research Advisory Board (ERAB). 1980.Gasohol. Washington, DC: Energy Research Advisory Board, U.S. Dept. of Energy.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1981.Biomass Energy. Washington, DC: Energy Research Advisory Board, U.S. Dept. of Energy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1990.Analysis of the Economic and Environmental Effects of Ethanol as an Automotive Fuel. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Energy Administration (FEA). 1976.Energy and U.S. Agriculture: 1974 data base. Vol. 1. Washington DC: Federal Energy Administration, U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Follett, R.F., and B.A. Stewart. 1985.Soil Erosion and Crop Productivity. Madison, WI: Amer. Soc. Agron., Inc., Crop Sci. Soc. of Amer., Inc., Soil Sci. Soc. of Amer., Inc., Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • General Accounting Office (GAO). 1980.Conduct of DOE's Gasohol Study Group. Washington, DC: United States General Accounting Office. GAO/EMD-80-128.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1990.Alcohol Fuels. Washington, DC: United States General Accounting Office, GAO/RCED-90-156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garst, D. 1990.What farmers want. Washington, DC: Talk to the Agri-Business Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaze, D.H., S.E. Miller, and C.S. Thompson. 1982. The demand for distillers dried grains in South Carolina.Bull. SC Agric. Exp. Stn., Clemson, SC The Station, Aug. issue 642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, S., J. Reilly, M.R. LeBlanc, and J. Hrubovcak. 1989. Ethanol's role: an economic assessment.Agribusiness 5: 505–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kates, R.W., R.S. Chen, T.E. Downing, J.X. Kasperson, E. Messer, and S.R. Millman. 1989.The Hunger Report Update 1989. Providence, RI: Alan Shawn Feinstein World Hunger Program, Brown University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuby, W., R. Markoja, and S. Nackford. 1984.Testing and evaluation of on-farm alcohol production facilities. Cincinnati, OH: Acurex Corporation. Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory. Office of Research and Development. U.S. EPA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal, R., and F.J. Pierce. 1991.Soil management for sustainability. Ankeny, IA: Soil and Water Conservation Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal, R., and B.A. Stewart. 1990.Soil Degradation. Advances in Soil Science. Vol. 11. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy Sciences (NAS). 1981.Feeding Value of Ethanol Production By-Products. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1989a.Alternative Agriculture. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1989b.Irrigation-Induced Water Quality Problems. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Advisory Panel (NAP). 1987.Fuel ethanol cost-effectiveness study. Final Report. Washington, DC: National Advisory Panel on Cost-Effectiveness of Fuel Ethanol Production.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, E.G., and L.K. Lee. 1987.The magnitude and costs of groundwater contamination from agricultural chemicals. U.S. Dept. of Agr., Econ. Res. Ser., Nat. Res. Econ. Div., Staff Re., AGES 870318.

  • Office of Technology (OTA). 1980.Energy from Biological Processes. Vols. I, II. Washington, DC: United States Office of Technology Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1990.Replacing gasoline: alternative fuels for light-duty vehicles. Washington, DC: United States Office of Technology Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paoletti, M.G., B.R. Stinner, and G.G. Lorenzoni. 1989. Agricultural Ecology and Environment.Agriculture Ecosystems and the Environment 27:1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel, D. 1989. Agriculture and ecotechnology. InEcological Engineering: An Introduction to Ecotechnology, edited by W.J. Mitsch and S.E. Jorgensen, pp. 103–25. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel, D., and M. Burgess. 1980. Energy inputs in corn production. InHandbook on Energy Utilization in Agriculture, edited by D. Pimentel, pp. 67–84. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel, D., and L. Levitan. 1986. Pesticides: Amounts applied and amounts reaching pests.BioScience 36: 86–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel, D., and D. Wen. 1990. Technological changes in energy use in U.S. agricultural production. InAgroecology, edited by C.R. Carroll, J.H. Vandermeer, and P.M. Rosset, pp. 147–67. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel, D., L. McLaughlin, A. Zepp, B. Lakitan, T. Kraus, P. Kleinman, F. Vancini, W.J. Roach, E. Graap, W.S. Keeton, and G. Selig. 1990. Environmental and economic impacts of reducing U.S. agricultural pesticide use (in press). InHandbook of Pest Management in Agriculture, edited by D. Pimentel. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel, D., A.F. Warneke, W.S. Teel, K.A. Schwab, N.J. Simcox, D.M. Ebert, K.D. Baenisch, and M.R. Aaron. 1989. Food versus biomass fuel: Socioeconomic and environmental impacts in the United States, Brazil, India, and Kenya.Advances in Food Research 32: 185–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S.H. 1989.Global Warming: Entering the Greenhouse Century. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slesser, M. and C. Lewis. 1979.Biological Energy Resources. New York: Halsted.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks Commodities. 1990.Impacts of the Richardson Amendment to H.R. 3030 on the U.S. Agricultural Sector. McLean, VA: Sparks Commodities, Inc., Washington Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troeh, F.R., J.A. Hobbs, and R.L. Donahue. 1980.Soil and Water Conservation for Productivity and Environmental Protection. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • USBC. 1989.Statistical Abstracts of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of Census.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA. 1986.Fuel Ethanol and Agriculture: An Economic Assessment. U.S. Dept. of Agr., Office of Energy, Agricultural Econ. Report Number 562.

  • —. 1989a.Agricultural Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. 1989b.Economics of Ethanol Production in the United States. U.S. Dept. of Agr. USDA-AER-607.

  • USWRC. 1979.The Nation's Water Resources. 1975-2000. Vols. 1#x2013;-4. Second National Water Assessment. Washington DC: United States Water Resources Council. U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waggoner, P.E. 1984. Agriculture and carbon dioxide.Am. Sci. 72:179–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walls, M.A., A.J. Krupnick, and M.A. Toman. 1989. Ethanol Fuel and Non-market Benefits: Is a Subsidy Justified? Discussion Paper ENR89-07. Washington, DC: Energy and Natural Resources Division, Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pimentel, D. Ethanol fuels: Energy security, economics, and the environment. J Agric Environ Ethics 4, 1–13 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02229143

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02229143

Keywords

Navigation