Abstract
In this paper we seek to accomplish two objectives. First, we review and describe a phenomenon we call the justice dilemma. We argue that workers often perceive valid assessment practices to be unfair. By using these techniques, employers risk incurring hidden costs that are associated with perceived injustice. Thus, it is sometimes impractical to utilize an assessment technique even though the procedure has good validity evidence. Our second purpose is to propose and test one way that organizations can resolve the justice dilemma. We do this in the context of workplace drug screening We argue that employees are often more tolerant of controversial assessment techniques to the extent that these procedures do not result in particularly negative outcomes. In a field study examining employee reactions to a drug screening program, this proposition was generally supported.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Backer, T. E., & O'Hara, K. B. (1991).Organizational change and drug-free workplaces. New York: Quorum.
Bies, R. J. (1987). The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.),Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 9, pp. 289–319). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Bies, R. J., & Shapiro, D. L. (1987). Interactional fairness judgments: The influence of causal accounts.Social Justice Research, 1, 199–218.
Bies, R. J., Shapiro, D. L., & Cummings, L. L. (1988). Causal accounts and managing organizational conflicts: Is it enough to say it's not my fault?Communications Research, 15, 381–399.
Brockner, J., Konovsky, M., Cooper-Schneider, R., Folger, R., Martin, C., Bies, R. J. (1994). Interactive effects of procedural justice and outcome severity on victims and survivors of job loss.Academy of Management Journal, 37, 397–409.
Cody, M. J., & McLaughlin, M. L. (1985). Models for the sequential construction of accounting episodes: Situational and interactional constraints on message selection and evaluation. In R. Street & J. Capella (Eds.),Sequence and pattern in communicative behavior (pp. 50–69). London: Arnold.
Crant, J. M., & Bateman, T. S. (1989). A model of employee responses to drug-testing.Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2, 173–190.
Crant, J. M., & Bateman, T. S. (1990). An experimental test of the impact of drug-testing programs on potential job applicants' attitudes and intentions.Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 127–131.
Cropanzano, R. (1994). The justice dilemma in employee selection: Some reflections on the trade-offs between fairness and validity.The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 31(3), 90–93.
Cropanzano, R., & Folger, R. (1989). Referent cognitions and task decision autonomy: beyond equity theory.Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 293–299.
Cropanzano, R., & Folger, R. (1991). Procedural justice and worker motivation. In R. M. Steers & L. W. Porter (Eds.),Motivation and work behavior (5th, pp. 131–143). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Cropanzano, R., & Konovsky, M. A. (1992).Drug testing practices as determinants of employee fairness perceptions. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Las Vegas, NV.
Cropanzano, R., & Konovsky, M. A. (1993). Drug use and its implications for employee drug testing. In G. R. Ferris & K. M. Rowland (Eds.),Research in personnel and human resource management (Vol. 11, pp. 207–257). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Cropanzano, R., & Randall, M. L. (in press). Advance notice as a means of reducing relative deprivation.Social Justice Research.
Faden, R. R., & Kass, N. E. (1993). Genetic screening technology: Ethical issues in access to tests by employers and health insurance companies.Journal of Social Issues, 49, 75–88.
Folger, R. (1986). Rethinking equity theory: A referent cognitions model. In H. W. Bierhoff, R. L. Cohen, & J. Greenberg (Eds.),Justice in social relations (pp.145–162). New York: Plenum.
Folger, R., & Martin, C. (1986). Relative deprivation and referent cognitions: Distributive and procedural justice effects.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 532–546.
Folger, R., Rosenfield, D., & Robinson, T. (1983). Relative deprivation and procedural justifications.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 172–184.
Fryxell, G. E., & Gordon, M. E. (1989). Workplace justice and job satisfaction as predictors of satisfaction with unions and management.Academy of Management Journal, 32, 851–866.
Gilliland, S. W. (1993a). The perceived fairness of selection systems: An organizational justice perspective.Academy of Management Review, 18, 694–734.
Gilliland, S. W. (1993b, April).Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to a selection system. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Francisco, CA.
Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Balkin, D. B. (1987). Dimensions and characteristics of personnel manager perceptions of effective drug-testing programs.Personnel Psychology, 40, 745–763.
Gordon, M. E., & Fryxell, G. E. (1993). The role of interpersonal justice in organizational grievance systems. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.),Justice in the workplace: Approach fairness in human resource management (pp. 231–255). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow.Journal of Management, 16, 399–432.
Greenberg, J. (1993). The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.),Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management (pp. 79–103). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Harland, L. K., & Biasotto, M. M. (1993, August). An evaluation of the procedural fairness of personality tests. In M. A. Ambrose (Chair),Procedural Justice. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Atlanta, GA.
Harris, M. M., Dworkin, J. B., Park, J. (1990). Preemployment screening procedures: How human resource managers perceive them.Journal of Business and Psychology, 4, 279–292.
Herriot, P. (1989). Selection as a social process. In M. Smith & I. T. Robertson (Eds.),Advances in selection and assessment (pp. 171–187). New York: Wiley.
Hoffman, A., & Silvers, J. (1987).Steal this urine test: Fighting drug hysteria in America. New York: Penguin Books.
Huffcutt, A. I., & Woehr, D. J. (1992, May).A meta-analytic examination of the relationship between employment interview validity and degree of structure. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. May, 1992, Montreal, Quebec.
Hunter, J. E., & Hunter, R. F. (1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance.Psychological Bulletin, 96, 72–98.
James, K., & Cropanzano, R. (1990). Focus of attention and locus of control as moderators of fraternal justice effects.Social Justice Research, 4, 169–185.
Kluger, A. N., & Rothstein, H. R. (1991, April). The influence of selection test type on applicant reactions to employment testing. In R. R. Reilly (Chair),Perceived validity of selection procedures: Implications for organizations. Symposium conducted at the annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Saint Louis, MO.
Konovsky, M. A., & Cropanzano, R. (1991). The perceived fairness of employee drug testing as a predictor of employee attitudes and job performance.Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 698–707.
Konovsky, M. A., & Cropanzano, R. (1993). Justice considerations in employee drug testing. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.),Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management (pp. 171–192). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lind, E. A. & Tyler, T. R. (1988).The Social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.
Markham, W. T., Harlan, S. L., & Hackett, E. J. (1987). Promotion opportunity in organizations: Causes and consequences. In K. M. Rowland & G. R. Ferris (Eds.),Research in personnel and human resource management (Vol. 5, pp. 223–287). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
McEnrue, M. P. (1989). The perceived fairness of managerial promotion practices.Human Relations, 42, 815–827.
Murphy, K. R., Thornton, G. C., III., & Prue, K. (1991). Influence of job characteristics on the acceptability of employee drug testing.Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 447–453.
Murphy, K. R., Thornton, G. C., III., & Reynolds, D. H. (1990). College students' attitudes toward employee drug testing procedures.Personnel Psychology, 43, 615–631.
Normand, J., Salyards, S. D., & Mahoney, J. J. (1990). An evaluation of preemployment drug testing.Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 629–639.
Reilly, R. R., & Chao, G. T. (1982). Validity and fairness of some alternative employee selection procedures.Personnel Psychology, 35, 1–61.
Robertson, I. T., & Kandola, R. S. (1982). Work sample tests: Validity, adverse impact and applicant reactions.Journal of Occupational Psychology, 55, 171–183.
Robertson, I. T., & Makin, P. J. (1986). Management selection in Britain: A survey and critique.Journal of Occupational Psychology, 59, 45–57.
Rosse, J. G., Ringer, R. C., Miller, J. L. (1992, August).Personality and drug testing: An exploration of the perceived fairness of alternatives to urinalysis. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management. Las Vegas, NV.
Rynes, S. L., & Connerley, M. L. (1993). Applicant reactions to alternative selection procedures.Journal of Business and Psychology, 7, 261–277.
Schuler, H. (1993). Social validity of selection situations: A concept and some empirical results. In H. Schuler, J. L. Farr, & M. Smith (Eds.),Personnel selection and assessment: Individual and organizational perspectives (pp. 11–26). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Schmitt, N., Gooding, R. Z., Noe, R. A., & Kirsch, M. (1984). Metaanalysis of validity studies published between 1964 and 1982 and the investigation of study characteristics.Personnel Psychology, 37, 407–422.
Shapiro, D. L. (1993). Reconciling theoretical differences among procedural justice researchers by re-evaluating what it means to have one's views “considered”: Implications for third-party managers. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.),Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management (pp. 51–78). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Shapiro, D. L., Buttner, E. H., & Barry, B. (in press). Explanations: What factors enhance their perceived adequacy?Organizational Behavior and Human Performance.
Smither, J. W., Reilly, R. R., Millsap, R. E., Pearlman, K., & Stoffey, R. W. (1993). Applicant reactions to selection procedures.Personnel Psychology, 46, 49–76.
Stoffey, R. W., Millsap, r. E., Smither, J. W., & Reilly, R. R. (1991, April). The influence of selection procedures on attitudes about the organization and job pursuit intentions. In R. R. Reilly (Chair),Perceived validity of selection procedures: Implications for organizations. Symposium conducted at the annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Saint Louis, MO.
Stone, D. L., & Bommer, W. (1990, August).Effects of drug testing selection method and justification provided for the test on reactions to drug testing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, San Francisco, CA.
Stone, D. L., & Bowden, C. (1989). Effects of job applicant drug testing practices on reactions to drug testing. In F. Hoy (Ed.),Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings (pp. 190–195).
Stone, D. L., & Kotch, D. A. (1989). Individuals' attitudes toward organizational drug testing policies and practices.Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 518–521.
Taylor, D. M., Moghaddam, F. M., Gamble, I., & Zellerer, E. (1987). Disadvantaged group responses to perceived inequality: From passive acceptance to collective action.Journal of Social Psychology, 127, 259–272.
Tett, R. P., Jackson, D. N., & Rothstein, M. (1991). Personality measures as predictors of job performance: A meta-analysis.Personnel Psychology, 44, 703–742.
Thornton, G. C., III. (1993). The effect of selection practices on applicants' perceptions of organizational characteristics. In H. Schuler, J. L. Farr, & M. Smith (Eds.),Personnel selection and assessment: Individual and organizational perspectives (pp. 57–69). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Zwerling, C., Ryan, J., & Orav, E. J. (1990). The efficacy of preemployment drug screening for marijuana and cocaine in predicting employment outcome.Journal of the American Medical Association, 264, 2639–2643.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cropanzano, R., Konovsky, M.A. Resolving the justice dilemma by improving the outcomes: The case of employee drug screening. J Bus Psychol 10, 221–243 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02249581
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02249581