Abstract
A precise and rapid procedure has been devised for dealing with a matrix of incomplete data in paired comparisons. This method should increase the general applicability of paired comparisons since experiments involving large numbers of stimuli may now be shortened to feasible experimental proportions. Also, we may now use sets of stimuli which cover a wide range, resulting in a considerable number of 100 per cent vs. 0 per cent judgments, and still give a precise solution depending equally on each of the observations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Garner, W. R., and Hake, H. W. The amount of information in absolute judgments.Psychol. Rev.,58, 1951, 446–459.
Horst, P. The prediction of personal adjustment.Social Science Research Council Bulletin No. 48, 1941.
Kempthorne, O. The design and analysis of experiments. New York: Wiley, 1952, pp. 96–98.
Kendall, M. G. The advanced theory of statistics, Vol. II. London: Griffin, 1948, pp. 229–230.
Mosteller, F. Remarks on the method of paired comparisons: I. The least squares solution assuming equal standard deviations and equal correlations.Psychometrika,16, 1951, 3–9.
Thurstone, L. L. The zero point in scaling. (Unpublished study.)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This study was supported in part by the Office of Naval Research Contract N6onr-270-20 with Princeton University and by the National Science Foundation Grant G-642. The opinions expressed are, of course, those of the author and do not represent attitudes or policies of the Office of Naval Research or of the National Science Foundation.
The author wishes to acknowledge helpful suggestions and comments received from Frederic M. Lord, Warren S. Torgerson, and Ledyard R Tucker. Thanks are also due to Mrs. Gertrude Diederich for some of the tabulating and computing for the illustrative problem.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gulliksen, H. A least squares solution for paired comparisons with incomplete data. Psychometrika 21, 125–134 (1956). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289093
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289093