Skip to main content
Log in

The mixed model for multivariate repeated measures: validity conditions and an approximate test

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Repeated measures on multivariate responses can be analyzed according to either of two models: a doubly multivariate model (DMM) or a multivariate mixed model (MMM). This paper reviews both models and gives three new results concerning the MMM. The first result is, primarily, of theoretical interest; the second and third have implications for practice. First, it is shown that, given multivariate normality, a condition called multivariate sphericity of the covariance matrix is both necessary and sufficient for the validity of the MMM analysis. To test for departure from multivariate sphericity, the likelihood ratio test can be employed. The second result is an approximation to the null distribution of the likelihood ratio test statistic, useful for moderate sample sizes. Third, for situations satisfying multivariate normality, but not multivariate sphericity, a multivariate ε correction factor is derived. The ε correction factor generalizes Box's ε and can be used to construct an adjusted MMM test.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, T. W. (1984).An introduction to multivariate statistical analysis (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barcikowski, R. S., & Robey, R. R. (1984). Decisions in single group repeated measures analysis: Statistical tests and three computer packages.The American Statistician, 38, 148–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, R. D. (1975).Multivariate statistical methods in behavioral research. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boik, R. J. (1981). A priori test in repeated measures designs: Effects of nonsphericity.Psychometrika, 46, 241–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Box, G. E. P. (1949). A general distribution theory for a class of likelihood criteria.Biometrika, 36, 317–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Box, G. E. P. (1954). Some theorems on quadratic forms applied in the study of analysis of variance problems, II. Effects of inequality of variance and correlation between errors in the two-way classification.Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 25, 484–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, R. O., Baker, F. B., Mandeville, G. K., & Hayes, T. F. (1967). Estimates of test size for several test procedures based on conventional variance ratios in the repeated measures design.Psychometrika, 32, 339–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, M. L. (1972). Univariate versus multivariate tests in repeated measures experiments.Psychological Bulletin, 77, 446–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll, M. G., & Gundberg, W. R. (1986). A history of the development of Craig's theorem.The American Statistician, 40, 65–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhouse, S. W., & Geisser, S. (1959). On methods in the analysis of profile data.Psychometrika, 24, 95–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hand, D. J., & Taylor, C. C. (1987).Multivariate analysis of variance and repeated measures. New York: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, H. V., & Searle, S. R. (1979). Vec and vech operators for matrices, with some uses in Jacobians and multivariate statistics.The Canadian Journal of Statistics, 7, 65–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, H. V., & Searle, S. R. (1981). The vec-permutation matrix, the vec operator and Kronecker products: A review.Linear and Multilinear Algebra, 9, 271–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huynh, H. (1978). Some approximate tests for repeated measures designs.Psychometrika, 43, 161–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huynh, H., & Feldt, L. S. (1970). Conditions under which mean square ratios in repeated measures designs have exactF-distributions.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 65, 1582–1589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huynh, H., & Feldt, L. S. (1976). Estimation of the Box correction for degrees of freedom from sample data in randomized block and split-plot designs.Journal of Educational Statistics, 1, 69–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huynh, H., & Feldt, L. S. (1980). Performance of traditionalF tests in repeated measures designs under covariance heterogeneity.Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods, 9, 61–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keselman, H. J., Rogan, J. C., Mendoza, J. L., & Breen, L. J. (1980). Testing the validity conditions of repeated measuresF tests.Psychological Bulletin, 87, 479–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khatri, C. G. (1959). On conditions for the forms of typeXAX' to be distributed independently or to obey Wishart distribution.Calcutta Statistical Association Bulletin, 8, 162–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laha, R. G. (1956). On the stochastic independence of two second degree polynomial statistics in normally distributed variates.Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 27, 790–796.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacRae, E. C. (1974). Matrix derivatives with an application to an adaptive linear decision problem.The Annals of Statistics, 2, 337–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnus, J. R., & Neudecker, H. (1979). The commutation matrix: Some properties and applications.The Annals of Statistics, 7, 381–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauchly, J. W. (1940). Significance test for sphericity of a normal-n-variate distribution.Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 11, 204–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, J. L. (1980). A significance test for multisample sphericity.Psychometrika, 45, 495–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, J. L., Toothaker, L. E., & Crain, B. R. (1976). Necessary and sufficient conditions forF ratios in theL × J × K factorial design with two repeated factors.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71, 992–993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, J. L., Toothaker, L. E., & Nicewander, W. A. (1974). A Monte Carlo comparison of the univariate and multivariate methods for the groups by trials repeated measures design.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 9, 165–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitzel, H. C., & Games, P. A. (1981). Circularity and multiple comparisons in repeated measures designs.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 34, 253–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muirhead, R. J. (1982).Aspects of multivariate statistical theory. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, K. E., & Barton, C. N. (1985). Approximate power for repeated measures ANOVA lacking sphericity.American Statistical Association 1985 Proceedings of the Statistical Computing Section, (pp. 413–418).

  • O'Brien, R. G., & Kaiser, M. K. (1985). MANOVA method for analyzing repeated measures designs: An extensive primer.Psychological Bulletin, 97, 316–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, C. R. (1951). An asymptotic expansion of the distribution of Wilks' criterion.Bulletin of the International Statistics Institute, 33, 177–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinsel, G. (1982). Multivariate repeated-measurement or growth curve models with multivariate random-effects covariance structure.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 77, 190–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouanet, H., & Lépine, D. (1970). Comparison between treatments in a repeated-measurement design: ANOVA and multivariate methods.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 23, 147–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, S. N. (1953). On a heuristic method of test construction and its use in multivariate analysis.Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 24, 220–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffé, H. (1956). A “mixed model” for the analysis of variance.Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 27, 23–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • SPSS (1983).SPSSX: User's guide. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, M. S., & Khatri, C. G. (1979).An introduction to multivariate statistics. New York: Elsevier North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timm, N. H. (1980). Multivariate analysis of variance of repeated measures. In P. R. Krishnaiah (Ed.),Handbook of statistics, Vol. 1 (pp. 41–87). New York: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. R. (1983). Univariate repeated measures techniques applied to multivariate data.Psychometrika, 48, 451–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. M. (1983). On the analysis of multivariate repeated measures designs.Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods, 12, 1647–1659.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilks, S. S. (1932). Certain generalisations in the analysis of variance.Biometrika, 24, 471–494.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I am grateful to an anonymous referee for carefully attending to the mathematical details of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boik, R.J. The mixed model for multivariate repeated measures: validity conditions and an approximate test. Psychometrika 53, 469–486 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294401

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294401

Key words

Navigation